Common-Core Standards in Reading Not 'Flawed'

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Joanne Yatvin protests teaching children the skills and knowledge they need to become competent and joyful readers ("A Flawed Approach to Reading in the Common-Core Standards,", Commentary, Feb. 29, 2012). Worse, she underestimates the capability and interest of young children. I, too, was an elementary school principal and saw firsthand the interest children took in the world around them. Kindergarten children devoured nonfiction about dinosaurs. They requested over and over again the Magic School Bus books about their bodies.

While I agree that the Common Core State Standards demand more of children and that analytical skills must be developed thoughtfully, young children can grapple with such texts.

Additionally, Ms. Yatvin protests the statement that students should receive explicit and systematic instruction in the reading-foundation skills in order to develop automaticity. This was exactly what the National Reading Panel found, and the finding is well supported by research.

Furthermore, the statement she decries does not say that comprehension comes automatically. The quoted portion states that independent and automatic reading is important "to ensure" that the focus can be on comprehension. It is well supported that students who lack automaticity and fluent reading ability have a harder time focusing on meaning.

Finally, the argument against the vocabulary focus is particularly troubling. Tier 2 words (as studied by Isabel L. Beck at the University of Pittsburgh) are not just academic words, but also vocabulary common to much of children's literature. By addressing academic language early, we can attempt to overcome the socioeconomic and language discrepancies noted in Todd R. Risley and Betty Hart's book Meaningful Differences in Everyday Experience of Young American Children (1995).

Developing academic and important vocabulary knowledge is an equity issue. I cannot believe Ms. Yatvin doesn't want our English-learners and children with impoverished vocabulary to develop language on par with their more advantaged peers.

Linda Diamond
Chief Executive Officer
Consortium on Reaching Excellence in Education
Berkeley, Calif.
The consortium was previously known as the Consortium on Reading Excellence, or CORE.

Vol. 31, Issue 26, Page 28

Published in Print: March 28, 2012, as Common-Core Standards in Reading Not 'Flawed'
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories