Opinion
Reading & Literacy Opinion

I Teach Writing. It’s Emotional Work

How to help students—and yourself—through the woes of writing
By Gillian Steinberg — July 15, 2022 4 min read
071522 opinion Steinberg Teaching Writing 131473770
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Great teachers know how to improve myriad aspects of student writing: idea generation, organization, evidence marshaling, diction, grammar, and more. But even with tools and techniques in each of these areas, students struggle.

As a longtime teacher of writing, first at the college level and now for high school students and professional adult writers, I have learned that attending to the often overlooked emotions that inevitably accompany all types of writing allows teachers to accomplish more with their student writers. You may recognize some of these student profiles:

  • The procrastinating student who reveals in conversation that she’s a “bad writer” and therefore can’t bring herself to get started.
  • The student who judges every sentence he writes as “sounding stupid,” prompting him to begin and delete, begin and delete, again and again.
  • The student who believes that “real writers” have a particular kind of written voice and therefore resorts to jargon and fancy—but not always syntactical!—diction.
  • The student who hates her own work, just handing in the first draft without proofreading.

Each of these situations feels like a writing problem that can be fixed with more writing instruction, but, in fact, all of these problems are rooted in the deep and complex emotions that surround writing. As teachers who include writing in our classrooms, regardless of whether writing is our discipline, we can help students overcome their procrastination, slow progress, reliance on the thesaurus, unrevised drafts, and many other writing issues by attending to their emotions as they approach and work through a writing project.

Three techniques in particular can help students through the many emotions that are central to writing:

1. Avoid early judgment. Often writers begin, whether knowingly or not, by envisioning a reader. Worrying about a reader’s reaction early in the process can lead to paralysis, the feeling that no opening sentence, paragraph, or idea is good enough. It prompts writers to rewrite their opening paragraphs endlessly, and it’s the reason that students can say “I worked on this essay for four hours” but have little to show.

When we teach students to avoid envisioning even an imaginary reader, to think instead of their exploratory draft as a diary entry or personal reflection, they can save the judgment for later and write with greater efficiency and even pleasure.

2. Separate the steps. By avoiding early judgment, students can also be taught to write in distinct stages: composition, organization, and editing. Too often, writers believe they will be most efficient and least uncomfortable with their perceived insufficiencies by polishing as they compose. While doing so might help them avoid the pain of ugly sentences, writing is both more stilted and less efficient this way.

Pouring poorly constructed thoughts onto the page quickly and then working to organize and develop them (using techniques like color coding or cutting up the paragraphs and moving them around like puzzle pieces) leads to much stronger content. Saving polish—grammar, diction, phrasing—for the final step, when an imaginary (or real!) reader can be helpful, allows the writer’s best ideas to shine through. Encouraging students to follow these best practices in process, though, requires preparing them for the discomfort of ugly writing and the emotions that accompany truly rough drafts.

3. Writing makes us vulnerable. There’s no way to avoid this; writing feels like the self on a page. Simply acknowledging this raw vulnerability, however, can change the way writers feel. Telling them “I know how hard this is”—not just because of struggles to find the right ideas but because writing makes everyone feel uniquely judged—helps student writers understand that they are not alone.

No less a writer than Gustave Flaubert lamented, “I am irritated by my own writing. I am like a violinist whose ear is true, but whose fingers refuse to reproduce precisely the sound he hears within.” If the celebrated author of Madame Bovary felt plagued by the insufficiency of his writing, student writers are certainly entitled to feel that way, too. Knowing that their discomfort is shared by others, not a solitary or shameful feeling, can push students through those feelings of exposure.

Openly discussing emotions reminds students and teachers alike that writing is difficult for everyone.

This focus on the emotionality of writing can be applied to writers of all ages and to ourselves, too. As teachers, we are often called upon to write: assignment prompts; letters of recommendation; emails; reports; and even blog posts, articles, and op-eds. Openly discussing emotions reminds students and teachers alike that writing is difficult for everyone, and doing so allows us to work through emotional challenges, not seeing them as flaws we should regret but as integral parts of the process that can ease when we are willing to sit with them.

We should remind our students that we empathize with their writing-based emotions, and we can offer them ways to persevere through the potential embarrassment and worries that accompany sharing themselves on the page. Knowing that they can work themselves to a better place by avoiding early judgment, separating their writing into steps, and acknowledging their emotions, we can empower them to be better, more confident, more able writers.

A version of this article appeared in the August 17, 2022 edition of Education Week as I Teach Writing. It’s Emotional Work

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
The Principal's Role in Collective Efficacy and Student Outcomes
Learn practical strategies that help principals translate their confidence into stronger collective teacher efficacy and student outcomes.
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Education Funding Webinar
What Schools Need to Know About the Federal Education Freedom Tax Credit
What schools need to know about the federal Education Freedom Tax Credit: A practical guide from a licensed teacher and policy expert.
Content provided by LearningSpring
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
Building Your School Safety Roadmap: Key Priorities for the Upcoming Year
What should be on your school's safety roadmap this year? Join experts to discuss priorities, preparedness, and best practices.
Content provided by Evolv Technology & IdentiSys

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Reading & Literacy Opinion Why Congress’s Latest Foray Into the Reading Wars Is Too Sloppy to Work
In trying to promote the science of reading, are politicians doing the opposite?
Timothy Shanahan
•
5 min read
Collage-style illustration of the top of the U.S. Capitol building rotunda, with the upper portion hinging open and an arm wearing a suit reaches out holding a pen. The hand is writing a red X through a clipping of a printed letter B, and cut out letters A and C are on the page as well.
Illustration by Emily Wright for Education Week + Getty
Reading & Literacy Federal 'Science of Reading' Legislation Passes the House
A bipartisan bill would make the evidence-based instruction a priority in some federal literacy grants.
3 min read
WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 16: Members of the U.S. House of Representatives leave the Capitol Building after a session on September 16, 2026 in Washington, DC. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) cancelled votes for Thursday, sending lawmakers home a day early ahead of the midterm-election recess.
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives leave the Capitol after a session on Sept. 16, 2026 in Washington, D.C. The House passed legislation that would make the "science of reading" a priority in some federal literacy grants.
Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images
Reading & Literacy Q&A The Science of Reading Has an Implementation Problem. Could Engineering Help?
Researchers suggest that an "engineering of reading" could better translate evidence into practice.
11 min read
Natalia Gutierrez, age 10 (5th grade), Garrett Christian, age 10 (5th grade), William Robinson, age 8 (3rd grade), wait to begin reading time in the afternoon at Creative Minds School in Wichita, Kansas on September 15, 2026.
Fifth graders Natalia Gutierrez, 10, and Garrett Christian, 10, and 3rd grader William Robinson, 8, wait to begin reading time in the afternoon at Creative Minds School in Wichita, Kan., on Sept. 15, 2026. Applying reading research to the classroom can be challenging, and engineering principles could help, some researchers say.
Melissa Lukenbaugh for Education Week
Reading & Literacy Quiz Quiz Yourself: Helping Older Readers Catch Up—What Really Works?
Test your knowledge of how schools can better support older struggling readers with targeted, effective literacy instruction.