Opinion
Mathematics Letter to the Editor

And an Essayist Misreads Alfred North Whitehead

March 20, 2007 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

In his spirited attack on what he characterizes as anti-reform forces in math education (“Mathematics and the Pure in Heart,” Feb. 28, 2007), T.C. O’Brien speculates that the British mathematician Alfred North Whitehead must have foreseen Parrot Math when he said, 90 years ago, “In training a child to activity of thought, above all things we must beware of what I will call ‘inert ideas’—that is to say, ideas that are merely received into the mind without being utilized, or tested, or thrown into fresh combinations.”

With regard to Whitehead’s opinion on carrying out rote procedures, however, there is no need to speculate, for he states quite clearly in his Introduction to Mathematics:

“It is a profoundly erroneous truism, repeated by all copybooks and by eminent people when they are making speeches, that we should cultivate the habit of thinking of what we are doing. The precise opposite is the case. Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking about them.”

Only by conflating Whitehead’s statements can one arrive at a holistic perspective, one that has been achieved by every working mathematician. Some mathematics educators focus only on the message of Whitehead’s first statement, but persistently and dangerously ignore the relevant warning of the second: Skills must be mastered to the point of automaticity in order to free the mind for the task at hand.

If young students don’t completely understand the whys and wherefores of what they are doing, they can gain that knowledge when they are older and better able to think abstractly. In contrast, students who don’t master the formal algebraic skills that should be acquired in grades K-12 are virtually impossible to remediate. It is the failure of reform curricula to demand that children learn to work automatically—as Whitehead advocates, without thinking about what they are doing— that threatens the mission of university math and science departments.

Stanley Ocken

Professor

Department of Mathematics

City University of New York

City College

New York, N.Y.

A version of this article appeared in the March 21, 2007 edition of Education Week as And an Essayist Misreads Alfred North Whitehead

Events

Recruitment & Retention Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Chronic Teacher Shortage: Where Do We Go From Here?  
Join Peter DeWitt, Michael Fullan, and guests for expert insights into finding solutions for the teacher shortage.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Close the Gender Gap: Getting Girls Excited about STEM
Join female STEM leaders as they discuss the importance of early cheerleaders, real life role models, and female networks of support.
Content provided by Logitech
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
Mission Possible: Saving Time While Improving Student Outcomes
Learn how district leaders are maximizing instructional time and finding the best resources for student success through their MTSS framework.
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Mathematics Spotlight Spotlight on Math Assessment and Intervention
This Spotlight will help you evaluate the latest trends in students’ math scores, explore growing investments in math education, and more.

Mathematics How Would Teachers Spend the Gates Foundation $1.1 Billion Investment in Math?
Professional development that actually sticks, smaller classes, and better instructional materials are on educators' wish lists.
4 min read
Illustration of a large dollar bill with an opening at the end where a man is passing big, heavy coins to various people.
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Mathematics Explaining That Steep Drop in Math Scores on NAEP: 5 Takeaways
Here are highlights on the historic declines in students' math scores on the just-released national assessment.
6 min read
Math problem and red pencil with broken point.
E+/Getty
Mathematics Why the Gates Foundation Is Investing $1.1 Billion in Math Education
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is investing big in math, including teacher training and high quality instructional materials.
8 min read
Minus, plus, and equals-shaped stacks of American one hundred dollar bills on a blue background.
iStock/Getty Images Plus