Student Well-Being

Smoking-Prevention Programs in Schools Found Ineffective for Teens

By Debra Viadero — March 08, 2005 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Smoking-prevention programs in schools do little to keep teenagers from lighting up in the long run, concludes a research review out last week.

The report, published in the Journal of Adolescent Health, is based on an examination of eight evaluations conducted during the 1980s and 1990s on popular, nationally recognized school-based anti-smoking or anti-drug programs. The studies showed that the programs, typically offered in elementary or middle schools, kept children from smoking cigarettes in the short term. But one to seven years down the road, when those students reached 12th grade, they smoked as frequently as peers who had never been exposed to prevention lessons.

“There may be an intervention out there that schools are using that is effective,” said Dr. Sarah E. Wiehe, the lead author. “But, if they’re using any of the programs that have been studied at length, they’re probably not effective.”

The full report, “A Systematic Review of School-Based Smoking Prevention Trials With Long-Term Follow-Up,” is available online from the Journal of Adolescent Health. See also the abstract. ()

Experts said the new study, coupled with others yielding similarly dismal results for particular programs such as Drug Abuse Resistance Education, or DARE, suggest that policymakers may want to think twice about mounting school-based smoking-prevention programs when other measures, such as media campaigns, cigarette price boosts, or smoke-free environments, might be cheaper and more effective ways of curbing youth smoking.

“I’m not saying there’s absolutely no role for schools,” said Stanton A. Glantz, the director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco. “But I think it’s time to recognize that something that seemed like a good idea once just isn’t.”

Mr. Glantz, who wrote an editorial accompanying the report, is not connected with the new study.

As an alternative to the packaged programs, he said, schools might consider using information on tobacco to teach real-world issues, such as the science of addiction or the effects of secondhand smoke, and incorporating those topics into the regular curriculum.

“Integrating tobacco issues into the curriculum in this way will help schools focus on what they should be doing and do best: teaching kids critical-thinking skills,” Mr. Glantz wrote in his editorial. In the report, he also called on the federal Centers for Disease Control to use the growing body of research evidence on the ineffectiveness of prevention programs to revise its guidelines for schools.

Lessons Learned

But representatives of some of the programs that were examined also noted that the studies included in the review were based on earlier, and possibly less effective, versions of their programs.

“We’ve learned a lot about how kids learn over the last 20 years,” said James J. McGivney, the Mid-Atlantic regional director for the Los Angeles-based DARE program. He said the recently revamped program no longer features a local police officer standing at the front of the room and lecturing students on the dangers of drugs. Instead, officers work with small groups of students, coaching them in role-playing and decisionmaking.

Dr. Wiehe said the eight programs her research team studied used a variety of approaches to teach students about the dangers of smoking, making it difficult to tell whether some approaches worked better than others.

The only model that was able to sustain results over the long run was the LifeSkills Program, an interactive curriculum that begins with intensive sessions in 7th grade and then offers “booster” lessons in 9th and 10th grades. By 12th grade, 27 percent of LifeSkills program participants reported smoking at least one cigarette a month, compared with 33 percent of students in the control group.

But experts said those results should be viewed with caution, because the evaluation was conducted by the program’s developer, Cornell University researcher Gilbert J. Botvin.

What may be happening, Dr. Wiehe said, is that the school-based programs simply postpone the start of smoking for many students. Still, since studies show that more than 80 percent of adult smokers picked up the habit before age 18, she added, it makes sense to continue targeting anti-smoking efforts at teenagers.

“The question is whether we should continue those intervention efforts later, past the age of 18,” Dr. Wiehe said.

Her study was underwritten by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation of Princeton, N.J. Dr. Wiehe’s co-authors, who are from the University of Washington in Seattle, are: Michelle M. Garrison, a research consultant in the department of pediatrics; Dr. Dimitri A. Christakis, an associate professor of pediatrics; Dr. Beth E. Ebel an assistant professor of pediatrics; and Dr. Frederick P. Rivara, a professor of pediatrics and epidemiology.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the March 09, 2005 edition of Education Week as Smoking-Prevention Programs in Schools Found Ineffective for Teens

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Data Webinar
Working Smarter, Not Harder with Data
There is a new paradigm shift in K-12 education. Technology and data have leapt forward, advancing in ways that allow educators to better support students while also maximizing their most precious resource – time. The
Content provided by PowerSchool
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Deepen the Reach and Impact of Your Leadership
This webinar offers new and veteran leaders a unique opportunity to listen and interact with four of the most influential educational thinkers in North America. With their expert insights, you will learn the key elements
Content provided by Solution Tree
Science K-12 Essentials Forum Teaching Science Today: Challenges and Solutions
Join this event which will tackle handling controversy in the classroom, and making science education relevant for all students.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Student Well-Being Letter to the Editor Policymakers Must Prioritize SEL
SEL is important both to help students overcome challenges caused by the pandemic and to build resilience in the longterm, says this letter to the editor.
1 min read
Illustration of an open laptop receiving an email.
iStock/Getty
Student Well-Being From Our Research Center COVID Precautions in the Cafeteria? 1 in 5 Educators Say Schools 'Not Doing Anything'
An EdWeek Research Center survey finds wide variation in what schools are doing to prevent the spread of COVID-19 during mealtimes.
5 min read
Elementary school girl in school cafeteria.
SDI Productions/E+
Student Well-Being Opinion Grief Has Engulfed the Learning Environment. Here's What Can Help
Three strategies to bring grief-responsive teaching into your classroom.
Brittany R. Collins
5 min read
Conceptual illustration of a stressed and unhappy person under a storm of negative emotions and viruses
fedrelena/iStock
Student Well-Being How Bad Is Student Absenteeism Right Now? Educators Tell Us
More than 60 percent of educators say that student absenteeism is higher this winter than it was in the fall of 2019.
1 min read
Image of an empty desk.
Laura Baker/Education Week and kazuma seki/Getty