Opinion Blog

Peter DeWitt's

Finding Common Ground

A former K-5 public school principal turned author, presenter, and independent consultant, DeWitt provides insights and advice for education leaders. He can be found at www.petermdewitt.com.

School & District Management Opinion

4 Questions Every Leadership Team Must Ask

By Peter DeWitt — November 22, 2020 5 min read
4 Questions All School Leadership Teams Should Ask.

The makeup of school leadership teams are often dependent on the size of the school population. Larger school populations will typically have more administrators on their leadership team because principals, assistant principals, and deans participate, still leaving room for some teachers to join. Other times, in schools with smaller populations, there will be more of a balance among administrators, teachers, and other professionals.

Regardless of the size of the school population or the sheer number of members participating on school leadership teams, there is a conversation all teams must have at their meetings. That conversation revolves around the instructional core (Elmore. 2006) of the school.

According to Elmore, the instructional core of the school includes:

  • Teachers’ knowledge and skill;
  • How students engage in their own learning;
  • Content that is academically challenging.

What school leadership teams need to decide is what role does they play in the process?

From Management to Instruction
If school leadership team meetings focus too much on management, which is always a risk, and not enough on student learning, then the members sitting around the table may lose sight of why they are on the school leadership team in the first place. Teaching and learning need to be a part of our leadership-team conversations. More than that, however, is actually having an impact on teaching and learning, not just talking about it in a meeting.

Principals, assistants, deans, teachers, and everyone else around the table need to engage in student-learning conversations so they can take time to develop a common language and common understanding around words like “student engagement” and define what academically challenging actually means.

These conversations will also help prepare assistant principals and deans for a future building role where they can feel confident as instructional leaders. Kaplan and Owings suggested (1999. p.82) “that as entry-level administrators, assistant principals typically maintain the norms and rules of the school culture, accepting major responsibilities such as student safety, chief disciplinarians, student conflict mediators, and hall patrollers.” Sadly, we know this has not changed too much since 1999.

Instructional leadership is when those in a leadership position focus their efforts on the implementation of practices that will positively impact student learning (DeWitt. 2019). Everyone around the school leadership team table has potential to become better at instructional leadership. If our goal, as Elmore says, is about strengthening the instructional core of the school, then at the same time we strengthen the efficacy of those around the leadership table.

The Role of Efficacy
We often hear a lot about self-efficacy, which is the confidence we have in our actions (Bandura. 1977), and collective teacher efficacy, which focuses on the collective self-perception that teachers can make an educational difference in the lives of their students (Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). However, we do not talk enough about collective leader efficacy, and that is exactly what a school leadership team is capable of building every time they meet.

Collective leader efficacy (CLE) happens when a school leadership team collectively works together, understands the complexities of working as a group, has confidence in each other’s ability to improve learning conditions for students, and develops the competence to do so. (DeWitt. 2020).

Self-efficacy is important because it impacts students in a classroom. Collective teacher efficacy is important because it can impact students in a grade level or department, and given the right conditions, may have a positive impact on a school. However, collective leader efficacy has the potential to positively impact students and teachers in a whole school community.

What About Collective Leader Efficacy?
In order to build collective leader efficacy, we need to consider preconditions like well-being (DeWitt), orientation to the job (Leithwood), locus of control (Leithwood), skills to work in collectives (Hattie), and the confidence to work in collectives (Hattie).

However, there is one more important element to building collective leader efficacy, and focusing on learning during school leadership team meetings, and those are the questions we ask while we are together. Too often, in leadership-team meetings, members do not feel comfortable talking or they wait for the school leader to talk first before they do. If trust isn’t present during these leadership- team meetings, then the real important work will not be focused on.

In an effort to help leadership teams focus on learning, which will help build collective leader efficacy, there are four questions that school leadership teams should use as the basis for their discussions.

Those questions are:

  • How are teachers and students working together to create authentic learning experiences? Authentic meaning, content-driven learning from in school and the learning students are doing on their own outside of school. For further clarification, this also means social-emotional learning as well as academic learning (Updated. 11/22/20. 4:06 pm.)
  • How are we supporting teachers in that process? This means the social-emotional and academic support teachers need.
  • How do we engage families in the process?
  • What unbiased evidence do we collect to understand our impact? This is evidence that we are open to learning from regardless of whether it supports our opinions or not (confirmation bias).

In the End
School leadership teams have the potential to have an enormous impact on student learning, which will ultimately strengthen the instructional core of the school community. Before COVID took place, during our time of COVID now, and long after it is over, the social-emotional learning needs of students and teachers should be at the center of what we do. However, during this time we have the opportunity to define our instructional core in school, which may mean looking at our most vital of standards and getting rid of some of what we used to teach because it does not have a place in our curriculum anymore.

In order to have those conversations, and inspire the leadership that may be dormant around the table, we need to dive into questions that will help us keep our focus, and the following four questions can help us do that.

  • How are teachers and students working together to create authentic learning experiences?
  • How are we supporting teachers in that process?
  • How do we engage families in the process?
  • What unbiased evidence do we collect to understand our impact?
Related Tags:

The opinions expressed in Peter DeWitt’s Finding Common Ground are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Let us know what you think!

We’re looking for feedback on our new site to make sure we continue to provide you the best experience.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Future of Work Webinar
Digital Literacy Strategies to Promote Equity
Our new world has only increased our students’ dependence on technology. This makes digital literacy no longer a “nice to have” but a “need to have.” How do we ensure that every student can navigate
Content provided by Learning.com
Mathematics Online Summit Teaching Math in a Pandemic
Attend this online summit to ask questions about how COVID-19 has affected achievement, instruction, assessment, and engagement in math.
School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Speech Therapists
Lancaster, PA, US
Lancaster Lebanon IU 13
Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools
Elementary Teacher - Scholars Academy
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools

Read Next

School & District Management Opinion A Road Map for Education Research in a Crisis
Here are five basic principles for a responsible and timely research agenda during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Robin J. Lake
4 min read
Two opposing sides reaching out to work together
J.R. Bee for Education Week
School & District Management 1,000 Students, No Social Distancing, and a Fight to Keep the Virus Out
A principal describes the "nightmare" job of keeping more than 1,000 people safe in the fast-moving pandemic.
4 min read
Dixie Rae Garrison, principal of West Jordan Middle School, in West Jordan, Utah.
Dixie Rae Garrison, principal of West Jordan Middle School in West Jordan, Utah, would have preferred a hybrid schedule and other social distancing measures.
Courtesy of Dixie Rae Garrison
School & District Management A School Leader Who Calls Her Own Shots on Battling the Coronavirus
A charter school founder uses her autonomy to move swiftly on everything from classroom shutdowns to remote schooling.
3 min read
Nigena Livingston, founder and head of School at the URBAN ACT Academy in Indianapolis, Ind.
Nigena Livingston, founder and head of school at the URBAN ACT Academy in Indianapolis, makes swift decisions in responding to the threat of COVID-19 in her school community.
Courtesy of Nigena Livingston
School & District Management A COVID-19 Lull Gives Way to ‘Borderline Insanity’
When the number of cases started to rise steeply, a school community hammered out a routine. Then a basketball player tested positive.
3 min read
Andy McGill, K-12 assistant principal at West Liberty-Salem Local School District in West Liberty, Ohio.
Andy McGill, K-12 assistant principal at West Liberty-Salem Local School District in Ohio, includes coronavirus response among his administrative duties.
Courtesy of Andy McGill