Opinion Blog


Rick Hess Straight Up

Education policy maven Rick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute think tank offers straight talk on matters of policy, politics, research, and reform. Read more from this blog.

Future of Work Opinion

This Group is Trying to Teach ‘Digital Literacy.’ Here’s How

Its goal is to help students become smarter consumers of online content
By Rick Hess — September 26, 2024 6 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

I recently talked with Sam Wineburg, the co-founder of the Digital Inquiry Group, about his research into misinformation. We discussed some of the studies he’s seen and conducted on misinformation, his book Verified, and how AI plays into the work he does. As you might expect, I had more questions for Sam, and he was kind enough to sit down for a second conversation about how the Digital Inquiry Group has tried to teach students “digital literacy.” Here’s what he had to say.

—Rick

Rick: Let’s dig a bit deeper into your current work. You’ve launched a new venture, the Digital Inquiry Group, that builds on your earlier work at Stanford. What exactly is it and what will you all be working on?

Sam: The Digital Inquiry Group, or DIG, is a new nonprofit organization that carries on the work of the Stanford History Education Group. We create evidence-based, nonpartisan, and free educational materials to help students learn about their past and their digital present. The average American teen spends over eight hours attached to a screen each day—not including schoolwork or homework. To learn about contemporary issues, Gen Z no longer goes to the library and pulls a book off a shelf. To learn about climate change, the efficacy of a tax on sugary drinks, or whether charter schools are more effective than regular public schools, they open a laptop or scroll on their phones. Our Civic Online Literacy curriculum helps them navigate an ocean of uneven sources. Our approach has been shown to make students savvier consumers of digital content in studies conducted not only by our group but also by researchers in Canada, Sweden, Germany, and Italy. DIG has also inherited the Reading Like a Historian curriculum, which was created over the course of two decades at Stanford. This curriculum has been downloaded 16 million times and appears on 41 state education department-recommended curriculum lists. We are always adding to it, most recently with new material for the elementary grades.

Rick: One initiative you’ve launched is a partnership with Microsoft, seeking to integrate digital literacy into the video game Minecraft. Can you talk a bit about how that’s going?

Sam: Minecraft is the world’s best-selling video game. There are a host of Minecraft versions that take up educational topics. The one we worked on was about finding and evaluating information. We collaborated with Minecraft’s education team on the game’s features, but the bulk of our efforts were devoted to creating the accompanying classroom materials that extend the game’s lessons. For example, we have lessons that help students distinguish between a claim shorn of references and one with ample links and others that help them grasp the concept of a conflict of interest—the problem with sources that advance claims in which they have a personal or financial stake. Our partnership with Microsoft also includes work with Search Coach, a browser with training wheels that introduces students to principles, like lateral reading, that are at the core of our work.

Rick: In launching the Digital Inquiry Group, you walked away from a prestigious faculty position at Stanford University. What prompted the move?

Sam: Stanford is one of the world’s finest universities. There’s not a day I don’t count my lucky stars that I was privileged to be a part of Stanford’s faculty for 23 years. At the same time, major research universities are not designed to act quickly to scale educational innovations. For example, when the Los Angeles Unified school district, the second largest district in the country, asked my team to help prepare teachers to use our Reading Like a Historian curriculum, it took months to move a contract through the university’s Grants and Contracts office. Schools and districts are scrambling to meet pressing needs. An organization that wants to help has to be agile and responsive. As an independent nonprofit, we can move quickly without having to go through multiple levels of approval.

Rick: More broadly, what are the trade-offs of doing this kind of education research inside or outside of the academy?

Sam: Stanford is a research institution par excellence; however, it is not an outreach institution par excellence. Thankfully, when my staff and I struck out on our own, we had the backing of Stanford. This has undoubtedly helped us gain financial footing and form strategic partnerships with prominent nonprofit organizations like iCivics and the Council on Foreign Relations, as well as with tech companies like Microsoft and Google. Sure, it’s true that as an independent nonprofit we no longer have to pay massive overheads on federal grants. But that’s not the primary reason we left the university. We wanted to work more intensively with schools and districts. Being independent allows us to do so directly without having to jump through the multiple hoops of university bureaucracy.

Rick: OK, can you offer a couple practical suggestions for educators when it comes to sorting internet fact from fiction?

Sam: In my book Verified, we use the acronym SIFT, coined by my co-author, Mike Caulfield. It stands for “Stop, Investigate, Find a better source, Trace back to the original.” Many people skip “stop,” the first step. Too many of us respond emotionally before asking a set of basic questions: How do I know that the image I’m looking at actually has anything to do with the caption that accompanies it? How can I be sure that the photo that stirs me was taken where its caption claims it was taken? With images, a brief “investigate” step can be conducted with Google Lens or TinEye. Similar caution should be taken when landing on an unfamiliar website. Before taking the website’s word, spend a minute reading laterally by, for instance, entering the name of the group in your browser and seeing what other sources—particularly ones you know and trust—say. And don’t forget about Wikipedia. Seriously. Well-trafficked Wikipedia articles are often time-saving first stops, where claims are backed by sources and bibliographies. If you still carry an impression of Wikipedia that you formed in 2003, you badly need an update. Today’s Wikipedia is vastly improved. The site now has a host of guardrails that prevent drive-by edits by bad actors, propagandists, and run-of-the-mill troublemakers.

Rick: That all sounds pretty sensible. But I’m also thinking that you suggest looking at other sources that “you know and trust.” What happens when the sources that I know and trust are different from those you know and trust? How do we ensure that doesn’t just reinforce our respective bubbles?

Sam: This is certainly a challenge. Anyone who says they’re immune to confirmation bias is an expert in self-deception. There’s no way to get out of our own filter bubble other than to read widely and purposely. In the words of John Stuart Mill, “He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that.”

Rick: Last question: We’re in the midst of a bitter presidential election. Any tips for helping students process the vitriol they’re seeing on social media?

Sam: It’s easy to get swept up in the politics of rage. None of us is immune. On social media, students should ask themselves: Are they ready to maul anything from the other side but caress posts that flatter their prior beliefs? Have they shared a post or video only to find out later that they were duped by an AI-generated deepfake? And the most important question students need to answer—actually, all of us need to answer—is this: What is to be gained by sharing? Are we really contributing to rational decisionmaking and reasoned debate about issues that affect our futures, or are we providing more oxygen to internet rage merchants whose toxins pollute the information stream? Quality, fact-based information is to civic health what clean air and water are to public health. Most of us no longer throw litter out of our car windows. Let’s not do it on the internet, either.

The opinions expressed in Rick Hess Straight Up are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
(Re)Focus on Dyslexia: Moving Beyond Diagnosis & Toward Transformation
Move beyond dyslexia diagnoses & focus on effective literacy instruction for ALL students. Join us to learn research-based strategies that benefit learners in PreK-8.
Content provided by EPS Learning
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
Cohesive Instruction, Connected Schools: Scale Excellence District-Wide with the Right Technology
Ensure all students receive high-quality instruction with a cohesive educational framework. Learn how to empower teachers and leverage technology.
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
How to Use Data to Combat Bullying and Enhance School Safety
Join our webinar to learn how data can help identify bullying, implement effective interventions, & foster student well-being.
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Future of Work STEM Jobs Aren’t Students’ First Choice. More Hands-On Experiences Could Help, Experts Say
Lack of exposure to STEM concepts may be contributing to the disconnect, according to the report.
3 min read
African-american schoolgirl pupil student using working with microscope at biology chemistry lesson class at school lab. STEM concept.
iStock/Getty
Future of Work Opinion 5 Lessons I’ve Learned From Using AI
Many educators may be nervous to use AI, but the reality is they are most likely using it already.
3 min read
Screen Shot 2023 11 19 at 10.03.27 AM
Canva
Future of Work Students Want STEM Careers, But Think Schools Are Doing a ‘Poor Job’ Preparing Them
Nearly all survey respondents said preparing students for STEM jobs is important.
3 min read
Photo of students working on computer boards.
E+ / Getty
Future of Work What 3 After-School Programs Are Doing to Prepare Kids for the Future of Work
After-school programs offer flexibility and time for hands-on learning to explore careers.
6 min read
robotics classroom with young african american student wearing VR
iStock/Getty<br/>