Federal

Backers, Foes Draw Battle Lines Over Mass. Charters

By John Gehring — May 19, 2004 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts has vowed to defeat efforts to slow the growth of charter schools in his state, after House lawmakers there approved a one-year moratorium on the independently operated public schools.

The measure, which passed the House of Representatives on April 28, would also halt the opening of five new charter schools already approved by the state education department until a new formula for financing charter schools is found. The Senate was scheduled to take up the moratorium issue this week.

The Republican governor showed no signs of backing away from charters when he visited Roxbury Preparatory Charter School in Boston on May 5 to award charters to four schools scheduled to open in the fall.

“Let there be no doubt, I will veto any charter school moratorium that reaches my desk,” Mr. Romney said at the school. “Charter schools provide more alternatives in public education and encourage innovation and excellence.”

Charter schools have become an increasingly contentious topic in Massachusetts.

Many school district leaders and public officials say the schools have created significant financial burdens for districts and towns because state funding follows students who leave regular public schools for charter schools. This school year, Massachusetts districts gave up a total of $138.5 million in state aid to charter schools, which enroll 15,884 students, according to education department data.

“Innovation and experimentation is a good thing, but it shouldn’t be done at the expense of schools and children,” said Kathleen A. Kelley, the president of the Massachusetts Federation of Teachers, a 22,000- member affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers.

‘Sheep’s Clothing’

District schools, she said, pay inflated per-pupil- expenditure costs for students going to charter schools because those costs include money for services such as special education that charter schools rarely incur.

“The costs have got to be more in line with what the actual per-pupil costs really are,” Ms. Kelley said.

Charter school advocates counter that districts are partially reimbursed by the state for those financial losses.

Massachusetts first gave charter schools the green light in 1993 as part of a broad education reform act. Today, 43 charter schools operate independently of the public school system, and seven, less controversial Horace Mann charter schools operate within districts.

Charter school proponents, including Commissioner of Education David P. Driscoll and a majority of the state board of education, say that while it may be necessary to review charter school funding, the schools have in some cases produced impressive results.

At Roxbury Prep Charter—which Gov. Romney visited two weeks ago to renew the school’s charter and award charters to new schools—scores on state exams in mathematics and English, for example, are some of the best in the state for a school that is largely Latino and African-American.

But the results are mixed on charter school performance across the state.

While a Boston Globe analysis found that more than 60 percent of urban charter schools had better test scores than did comparable noncharter schools, more than half the charter schools around the state scored below average on the math and English exams.

The state board of education has shut down only one charter school: In 2002, the state revoked the charter of Lynn Community Charter School because of organizational and academic shortcomings.

According to the office of Mayor Edward J. “Chip” Clancy Jr., the city of Lynn lost $7.6 million to the now- defunct charter school from 1997 through 2002.

Despite the failure of the school and the fiscal impact, a new charter school with different owners is scheduled to open in September against the wishes of the mayor and nearly every other public official in Lynn.

Mayor Clancy has called charter schooling a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” that drains dollars from regular public schools and diverts resources to untried, mostly for-profit schools.

According to Bill Bochnak, the mayor’s deputy chief of staff, as state education aid to the city has shrunk over the past two years, 270 teachers and other employees have been laid off in the 15,000-student Lynn school system. Kindergarten and pre-K programs have also been eliminated. A new charter school, Mr. Bochnak said, would cost the district $800,000 in its first year.

A version of this article appeared in the May 19, 2004 edition of Education Week as Backers, Foes Draw Battle Lines Over Mass. Charters

Events

Early Childhood Webinar Selling Into Early Learning: New Survey Data and Strategies for Marketers
Selling into PreK? Get fresh EdWeek Research Center data and strategies to position your products and reach the right early learning buyers.
Artificial Intelligence Webinar AI and 'Techlash' Are on a Collision Course. How Should Schools Respond?
Learn what strategies and tactics schools can develop to encourage smart and responsible AI use, while also enforcing tech guardrails.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Special Education Disputes & Rising Costs: Protecting Your District
Special education costs and risks are rising. Learn how stronger IEP and Medicaid processes help districts protect funding and compliance.
Content provided by Relay

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Q&A A Top Democrat Breaks Down His Party's Plans for K-12 in a House Majority
If Democrats retake the House, Rep. Bobby Scott may be in a position to set his chamber’s K-12 agenda.
5 min read
Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil held by the Chesapeake Coalition of Black Pastors at The Mount (Mount Lebanon Baptist Church) in Chesapeake, Va., Sunday, Nov. 27, 2022, for the six people killed at a Walmart in Chesapeake, Va., when a manager opened fire with a handgun before an employee meeting Tuesday night.
Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil in Chesapeake, Va., on Nov. 27, 2022. Scott is the ranking Democrat on the U.S. House of Representatives' education committee and will seek the panel's chairmanship if Democrats win a House majority in next month's elections.
Carolyn Kaster/AP
Federal What a Democratic Congress Could Mean for Trump's K-12 Agenda
They may try to reverse—or at least investigate—the Trump admin.'s efforts to dismantle the Ed. Dept.
9 min read
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the top Democrat in the Republican-majority House, is joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., chair of the House Democratic Caucus, as they criticize President Donald Trump and his policies while talking to reporters about the approaching midterm election, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2026.
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 17, 2026. He's joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., who chairs the House Democratic Caucus. If Democrats gain a majority of either chamber of Congress after next month's elections, they'll be able to hold oversight hearings on and launch investigations into the dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Federal The Future of Education Research: More Partisan and Largely Left to States?
As Trump administration works to change federal grants, outside researchers try to regroup.
6 min read
Image of file folders with tabs called "funding" "grants" "projects" and a blank note paper paperclipped to the outside.
Collage by Laura Baker/Education Week + Getty
Federal Bipartisan Bill in Congress Would Help Schools Put Cellphone Bans or Restrictions in Place
The bill would establish a federal grant program to support state efforts to restrict cellphones.
5 min read
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, center, is joined from left by Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., the GOP whip, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as he speaks to reporters ahead of a Wednesday meeting with President Donald Trump, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 23, 2026.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., speaks to reporters ahead of a meeting with President Donald Trump at the Capitol in Washington on June 23, 2026. Cotton is one of the sponsors of a bipartisan bill that would create a grant program for states to implement school cellphone bans or restrictions.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP