School & District Management

RAND Finds Mixed Results For School Reform Models

By Debra Viadero — April 18, 2001 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A decade after New American Schools was founded to develop, test, and replicate comprehensive models for improving schools, the districts that are trying out those designs are still showing mixed results.

For More Information

Read the report, “Implementation and Performance in New American Schools: Three Years into Scale-Up,” from RAND‘s education research page. (Requires Adobe’s Acrobat Reader.)

That conclusion comes from the latest report from the RAND Corp. on the progress of the New American Schools initiative. Preliminary findings from the report, which is due to be released this summer, were presented here during last week’s annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

The aim of New American Schools, a private, nonprofit organization based in Arlington, Va., was to spearhead a national effort to foster school improvement models that resulted in dramatic improvements in student achievement. Toward that end, the organization in 1992 awarded start-up grants to 11 design teams with promising programs for improving schools.

New American Schools settled on seven of those designs when it began to move the programs out into 10 school districts across the country on a large scale in 1995.

The targeted designs included: Purpose-Centered Education, which was formally known as Audrey Cohen College; Authentic Teaching, Learning, and Assessment for All Students, or ATLAS; Co-Nect Schools; Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound; Modern Red Schoolhouse; America’s Choice Design Network; and Roots & Wings.

Researchers from RAND, a Santa Monica, Calif.-based think tank, have been tracking the initiative since 1991. But the new findings are based on studies begun five years ago as the school improvement models began expanding into school districts from Tennessee to Washington state.

Thanks to a federal program designed to encourage schools nationwide to adopt comprehensive reform models, the number of schools using one of the original New American Schools designs has since swelled to 3,000.

Gains Not Dramatic

The schools in the original 10 districts taking part in the New American Schools initiative were, for the most part, poorer than the national average and had higher-than-average concentrations of minority students, according to the RAND researchers.

Of the 163 schools they have been tracking over the past five years, 81—or about half—have made greater improvements in student achievement in mathematics than students in their overall districts. In reading, 76 schools, or about 46 percent, made similar gains.

“These do not meet the expectations of New American Schools for dramatic effects across the board,” said Susan Bodilly, the RAND researcher who presented the findings at the AERA conference.

Susan Bodilly

Her co-authors on a paper laying out those findings were Mark Berends and Sheila Nataraj Kirby, also of RAND.

Some school districts were more successful than others in showing student-achievement gains. Schools in Memphis, Tenn., and several districts in Kentucky, for example, saw the most improvement in mathematics. The biggest reading gains were chalked up in Cincinnati and in several districts in Washington state, according to the researchers.

Likewise, the designs themselves experienced uneven success. Of the eight Audrey Cohen schools examined, for example, five surpassed student- achievement gains made for their home districts in mathematics. But only two managed that feat in reading.

The most consistently successful reform model appeared to be Roots & Wings, an approach that piggybacks on Success For All, the systematic reading program created by researchers at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. Ten of the 21 schools using that design, which goes beyond Success For All to include other subjects besides reading, made progress in comparison with their districts in both reading and math.

Except for ATLAS and Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound, about half the schools that used the remaining designs outpaced gains for their districts in math.

Since the student-achievement measures differed from district to district, however, the researchers cautioned against reading too much into those results.

“Better and longer-term performance data are needed in order to make conclusive judgments about designs and their effects on school performance,” the researchers write in their paper.

Implementation Varies

Further muddying the performance picture, the districts varied greatly in the degree to which they were implementing the programs. Overall, the researchers found, two years into the start-up phase, about half of a subgroup of 40 schools that they looked at as case studies were implementing the designs at the target levels. And some models were being carried out more fully than others. Modern Red Schoolhouse, for example, tended to lag behind other designs in implementation.

But most of the variation the researchers found was occurring within schools, rather than from school to school.

“These attempts at whole- school reform did not affect the whole school,” the researchers write.

Influential Factors

The researchers identified factors that either hindered or helped schools and districts in their efforts to put in place the reform models. They found that:

  • The programs were adopted more fully in smaller schools and in elementary schools.
  • Teachers who cited their students’ lack of basic skills, parental support, or disciplined behavior as significant barriers to learning were less likely to fully embrace the models.
  • Having a stable team of consultants from the model programs who could communicate clearly, market their programs effectively, and conduct training for the entire school, rather than for a few teachers, bolstered the programs’ implementation.
  • The programs became more firmly ensconced in schools where they had the active support of principals and in systems that experienced consistent, district-level financial, regulatory, and political support for the models.
Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the April 18, 2001 edition of Education Week as RAND Finds Mixed Results For School Reform Models

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management
Moving the Needle on Attendance: What’s Working NOW
See how family engagement is improving attendance, and how to put it to work in schools.
Content provided by TalkingPoints
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Rethinking STEM Assessment: Strategies for Administrators
School and district leaders will explore strategies to enhance STEM assessment practices across their district, within schools and classrooms.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
Federal Webinar Keeping Up with the Trump Administration's Latest K-12 Moves: Subscriber-Exclusive Quick Hit
EdWeek subscribers, join this 30-minute webinar to find out what the latest federal policy changes mean for K-12 education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management Download How to Boost Teacher Morale: A Guide for District Leaders (DOWNLOADABLE)
Our discussion guide for district leaders has three takeaways about teachers' attitudes toward their job. Use it to jump start PD with your team.
1 min read
A leader meets with their team. Superintendents, principals, schools leaders, district maps.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week via Canva
School & District Management No More Fresh Fruits and Veggies: Schools Grapple With Loss of Federal Funding
The Local Food to Schools program, which was canceled by the Trump administration, helped schools get fresh, local produce.
7 min read
Dan Yarnick inspects produce at Yarnick's Farm in Indiana, Pa., on June 4, 2025. The farm is one of a number of local providers who partnered with Pittsburgh Public Schools to provide students with fresh fruits and veggies.
Dan Yarnick inspects produce at Yarnick's Farm in Indiana, Pa., on June 4, 2025. The farm is one of a number of local providers who partnered with Pittsburgh Public Schools to provide students with fresh fruits and vegetables. These types of partnerships are in jeopardy with the cancellation of the Local Food for Schools program.
Nate Smallwood for Education Week
School & District Management How Schools Think Their Legal Expenses Will Change Under Trump
The first few months of the Trump administration have been like "drinking from a fire hose," an education attorney said.
5 min read
Illustrated photo of a ship made out of money and carrying a large red question mark with a stormy seascape and sky all around.
iStock/Getty
School & District Management How Schools Are Reaching Immigrant Families Over Summer
Experts advise district leaders to stay up to date on immigration policy changes.
4 min read
A principal watches her multilingual student leaders present a supportive buddy system to a room full of educators on May 29, 2024 in New York City.
A principal watches her multilingual student leaders present a supportive buddy system to a room full of educators on May 29, 2024 in New York City. The district boasts school-based teams called Dream Squads that conduct outreach to immigrant families over the summer.
Courtesy of New York City Public Schools