Technology Counts 2009 - Breaking Away From Tradition: E-Education Expands Opportunities For Raising Achievement Sponsored Online:

How the EPE Research Center Graded the States

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

For the Technology Leaders section of Technology Counts 2009, the EPE Research Center collected data on 10 indicators spanning two major areas of state technology policy and practice: use and capacity. The center obtained that information from its 2008-09 school year survey of technology officials from state departments of education in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. This edition of Technology Counts grades states separately on each of the two monitored categories and does not calculate a summative grade.

The use-of-technology grade is based on four individual policy indicators, which respectively capture whether a state: has standards for students that include technology; tests students on technology; has established a virtual school; and offers computer-based student assessments. In the capacity-to-use-technology category, grades are based on six measures that indicate—separately for teachers and administrators—whether a state: has technology standards for educational professionals (i.e., teachers, administrators); requires technology coursework or a test for initial professional licensure; and requires technology training or a technology test for professional recertification.

In each graded category, states receive credit for the respective policies they have enacted. Each indicator receives equal weight in the grading so that scores are proportional to the number of implemented policies. A state with all monitored policies in a category is awarded 100 points, while a state with no policies in place would receive 59 points (an F grade).

Letter grades were assigned based on the following scale: 93 to 100 percent = A; 90 to 92 percent = A-minus; 87 to 89 percent = B-plus; 83 to 86 percent = B; 80 to 82 percent = B-minus; 77 to 79 percent = C-plus; 73 to 76 percent = C; 70 to 72 percent = C-minus; 67 to 69 percent = D-plus; 63 to 66 percent = D; 60 to 62 percent = D-minus; below 60 percent = F.

Vol. 28, Issue 26, Page 34

Published in Print: March 26, 2009, as How the EPE Research Center Graded the States
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >