Education

Chapter 1: ‘Full Funding’ of Chapter 1 Remains An Elusive Goal

By Julie A. Miller — May 22, 1991 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Chapter 1 receives more funds than any other precollegiate-education program--$6.2 billion in the current fiscal year, which represents its highest funding level ever, measured in constant dollars.

Chapter 1:
An Educational Revolution
Chapter 1: ‘Full Funding’ of Chapter 1 Remains an Elusive Goal
Chapter 1: Studies Show Mixed Results, Spur Calls forChanges in Program
Chapter 1: New Provisions Forcing a Critical Look at the Quality of Services
Chapter 1: New Approaches to Funding, Testing, and Teaching Advocated
Chapter 1: Felton Continues To Pose Logistical Challenges; Opponents of Services Wage New Legal
Chapter 1: Need for Separate Handicapped Program Again Up for Discussion

But the money appropriated by the Congress has never approached the levels envisioned by its creators.

In 1985, Samuel Halperin, an assistant U.S. commissioner of education when Title I was enacted in 1965, told a 20th-anniversary banquet how President Lyndon B. Johnson’s budget advisers rebuked education officials for proposing a cash-flow system projected to handle “a mere $8 billion a year” by 1969.

They need not have worried. While education advocates have criticized Ronald Reagan and George Bush in recent years for skimping on funding for Chapter 1, they have actually been disappointed almost from the program’s inception.

President Johnson requested “full funding” of his new program in fiscal 1966, at about $1.2 billion. While only $959 million was appropriated, schools were still allowed to claim their full entitlements.

But the Johnson budget for the next fiscal year contained only a 10 percent increase, or only three-fourths of the amount that had been authorized.

With Mr. Johnson increasingly preoccupied with economic troubles and the Vietnam War, funding for Title I slipped further and further from “full funding.”

By 1969, the program was receiving only half what had been authorized, and it was rumored that the Congress was going to approve a cut in the next budget.

Nonetheless, optimistic assumptions are reflected in the name of the umbrella advocacy organization that worried education lobbyists created that year--the Emergency Committee for the Full Funding of Education Programs.

The group, which was meant to be temporary, succeeded in adding a great deal to the fiscal 1970 appropriations bill.

As measured in constant dollars, Title I spending rose steadily and peaked in 1973. It then declined for several years and rose again in fiscal years 1977 through 1979. In 1979, it passed the 1973 mark.

Constant-dollar spending fell sharply during the early Reagan years before rising again in 1987. Last year’s $856-million increase was the largest in Chapter 1’s history, bringing its funding to the current, $6.2-billion high point--about 63 percent higher in constant dollars than in 1966.

But the 1991 appropriation would have to be $31 billion to equal the “mere” $8 billion that had been projected for 1969.

Meanwhile, the number of children living in poverty has increased, and experts estimate that only about half the eligible children are currently receiving services.

In 1982, the “Emergency Committee” changed its name to the Committee for Education Funding.

A version of this article appeared in the May 22, 1991 edition of Education Week as Chapter 1: ‘Full Funding’ of Chapter 1 Remains an Elusive Goal

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
Smarter Tools, Stronger Outcomes: Empowering CTE Educators With Future-Ready Solutions
Open doors to meaningful, hands-on careers with research-backed insights, ideas, and examples of successful CTE programs.
Content provided by Pearson
Recruitment & Retention Webinar EdRecruiter 2026 Survey Results: How School Districts are Finding and Keeping Talent
Discover the latest K-12 hiring trends from EdWeek’s nationwide survey of job seekers and district HR professionals.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Recalibrating PLCs for Student Growth in the New Year
Get advice from K-12 leaders on resetting your PLCs for spring by utilizing winter assessment data and aligning PLC work with MTSS cycles.
Content provided by Otus

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Opinion The Opinions EdWeek Readers Care About: The Year’s 10 Most-Read
The opinion content readers visited most in 2025.
2 min read
Collage of the illustrations form the top 4 most read opinion essays of 2025.
Education Week + Getty Images
Education Quiz Did You Follow This Week’s Education News? Take This Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz How Did the SNAP Lapse Affect Schools? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz New Data on School Cellphone Bans: How Much Do You Know?
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read