Education Letter to the Editor

What to Do in Light of the Reading First Report

November 07, 2006 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

As one who has had the opportunity to work with states, school districts, and schools in preparing Reading First applications, it is with great interest that I read the U.S. Department of Education inspector general’s initial report on the federal program, and I look with anticipation to future reports (“Scathing Report Casts Cloud Over ‘Reading First’,” Oct. 4, 2006). The findings come as no surprise.

To those who tried to resist the coercion and intimidation of Christopher J. Doherty and the Reading First gestapo, I offer my sympathy. Unfortunately, billions of dollars are long gone, to the bottom lines of those companies with highly structured basal programs that were deemed “effective.” It was obvious and well known even in 2002 that some inadequate research was deemed “good,” while other inadequate research was deemed “bad.” No program had then, or has today, research that proves its effectiveness (using the Education Department’s definition of reliable research).

Some actions can be taken at this point. First, ensure that decisionmakers in your state, district, and school are aware of the inspector general’s reports. Second, follow those responsible for this abuse of power. Know where they have taken their biases and act accordingly. Third, and perhaps most important, hold the researchers of Reading First’s effectiveness to the same standards supposedly used by the Reading First panel.

Some questions to ask: What were the sizes of the experimental and control groups? How were the two groups randomized? What was the design that isolated the effect of the materials used? In what peer-reviewed journal is the study published? Where has it been replicated?

Don’t let inadequate research continue the myth that teachers of early literacy must have a “scripted” program to teach young children to read.

Wes Schultz

Amarillo, Texas

A version of this article appeared in the November 08, 2006 edition of Education Week as What to Do in Light of The Reading First Report


Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
English-Language Learners Webinar English Learners and the Science of Reading: What Works in the Classroom
ELs & emergent bilinguals deserve the best reading instruction! The Reading League & NCEL join forces on best practices. Learn more in our webinar with both organizations.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Teaching Webinar
Challenging the Stigma: Emotions and STEM
STEM isn't just equations and logic. Join this webinar and discover how emotions fuel innovation, creativity, & problem-solving in STEM!
Content provided by Project Lead The Way

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: February 7, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: January 31, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: January 17, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education In Their Own Words The Stories That Stuck With Us, 2023 Edition
Our newsroom selected five stories as among the highlights of our work. Here's why.
4 min read
102523 IMSE Reading BS
Adria Malcolm for Education Week