Teaching Profession

Supreme Court to Hear Case on Teachers’ Union Agency Fees

By Vaishali Honawar — September 26, 2006 3 min read

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed today to take up the issue of when a teachers’ union may spend the money it collects in the form of agency fees from nonmembers on its political causes.

The justices agreed to review a Washington state law that requires nonmembers to affirmatively consent, or opt in, before a union may spend their fees on its political agenda. Meanwhile, the court also agreed to take up a case involving the federal Impact Aid statute and whether states may reduce their funding to districts with federal installations by the same amount of aid provided by the federal government.

In action in the days before the official start of its new term on Oct. 2, the court agreed on Sept. 26 to add the cases to its docket.

In the teachers’ union case, the court accepted an appeal from the state of Washington of a ruling by the Washington Supreme Court that struck down the provision as a violation of the union’s First Amendment rights of free speech and association.

The appeals in Washington v. Washington Education Association and Davenport v. Washington Education Association (Cases No. 05-1589 and 05-1687) involve fees paid by workers who choose not to join the union but who benefit from the collective-bargaining process. Unions collect an “agency shop fee” from such workers.

John M. West, a District of Columbia lawyer representing the Washington Education Association, said nonmember workers are given the choice at the beginning of each year to state whether they want a portion of their dues to go toward political causes. Those who choose not to don’t have to pay that portion.

Mr. West said every nonmember also gets a lengthy notice on how the union spends its money.

“They get a full accounting of how much goes for collective bargaining, how much goes for lobbying, public relations, organizing, as well as for political expenditures,” he said.

But the Washington attorney general’s office and groups that filed friend-of-the-court briefs against the union say that there ought to be additional safeguards to ensure that any funds left over after collective bargaining are not used for political purposes without requiring affirmative consent from the nonmembers.

A 1992 Washington state law required that unions get affirmative consent from each worker before using any dues for political purposes. Earlier this year, the state high court struck down the provision, saying it violated the union’s First Amendment rights, and it held that the union’s annual offer to reduce the fees for those who object to the use of their dues for political causes was sufficient.

Michael Reitz, a lawyer for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, a conservative think tank based in Olympia, Wash., that first filed a complaint against the union that led to the case, said the nonmember opt-in is required because the union has in past instances used funds that were left over after collective bargaining for political causes, violating the wishes of such employees who did not want to contribute to the union’s political causes.

Getting the authorization upfront is not enough, Mr. Reitz said, adding that his group got involved after a number of workers who were not union members complained to the foundation.

The WEA, the state’s largest teachers’ union and an affiliate of the National Education Association, represents more than 70,000 workers in 370 locals. Of those, fewer than 5 percent are not union members.

In a brief filed in the U.S. Supreme Court, lawyers for the union argue that Washington is the only state in the nation that has made it unlawful for a union to finance what would otherwise be lawful political advocacy as a matter of state law.

Impact Aid Case

Meanwhile, in the case involving the federal Impact Aid law, the justices agreed to hear an appeal from two New Mexico districts whose state aid was reduced by the amounts of Impact Aid they had received from the federal government.

A federal appeals court had upheld the U.S. Department of Education’s regulation allowing a state to redistribute Impact Aid as long as the federal secretary of education had determined that the state had an equalized state funding system.

The appeal is Zuni Public School District No. 89 v. Department of Education (No. 05-1508).

Both the teachers’ union and Impact Aid cases will likely be argued early next year.

Related Tags:

Events

School & District Management Live Event Education Week Leadership Symposium
Education Week's Premier Leadership Event for K12 School & District Leaders.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Law & Courts Webinar
The Future of Criminal Justice Reform: A Sphere Education Initiative Conversation
America’s criminal justice system is in crisis and calls for reform are dominating the national debate. Join Cato’s Sphere Education Initiative and Education Week for a webinar on criminal justice and policing featuring the nation’s
Content provided by Cato Institute
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Equity, Care and Connection: New SEL Tools and Practices to Support Students and Adults
As school districts plan to welcome students back into buildings for the upcoming school year, this is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and our systems to build a
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Teaching Profession 4 Ways Districts Are Giving Teachers More Flexibility in Their Jobs
After a year-plus of pandemic schooling, some experts are seeing momentum for district leaders to reimagine what teaching can look like.
11 min read
Teacher working at home in front of camera.
Getty
Teaching Profession New Teaching Jobs May Emerge With Continued Demand for Virtual Learning
As school districts plan for online learning to continue beyond the pandemic, they'll need teachers to staff those virtual classrooms.
4 min read
Teaching Profession Teacher Salaries Are Increasing. See How Your State Compares
The National Education Association warns that some of the progress in teacher pay could be jeopardized by the pandemic.
2 min read
Teacher Salary Rankings 04262021 943331302
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Teaching Profession Opinion What Can We Do to Help the Well-Being of Teachers?
A Seat at the Table focused on the social-emotional well-being of teachers during the pandemic. Here's what we learned from the guests.
1 min read
Sera   FCG
Shutterstock