Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Assessment Letter to the Editor

Trained Peers, Not Tests, Needed to Evaluate Teachers

April 23, 2014 1 min read

To the Editor:

States are rushing out high-stakes teacher-rating systems with real consequences that do not come close to meeting the criteria outlined by the authors of the Commentary “Take the Time to Evaluate Teacher Evaluation”.

We would be naive to believe that this is being done out of a desire to genuinely improve the work of teachers. This is being done to chase Race to the Top funding and to further ideological agendas that see education as a bottom-line endeavor and that do not trust or respect teachers as true professionals.

Measures of student “growth” using standardized tests can provide some formative-assessment data on students, but they will not encourage professional growth or provide valid teacher ratings. Student performance is affected by far too many variables to effectively determine the specific contribution of an individual teacher.

The consequences attached to these evaluation measures end up stifling innovation, collaboration, and honest discussion. The idea that there is a magic algorithm to quantify effective teaching is a fantasy and a destructive waste of time and money that does nothing to support students.

Peer-assistance and -review programs, on the other hand, using carefully vetted and trained mentors, instructional supervisors, and peer reviewers, can move us in the right direction. Such programs respect teaching as a true profession and place the focus back where it belongs: on strengthening classroom practice and teachers’ relationships with students.

Stefan Cohen

History Teacher, School of the Arts

Peer Reviewer, Social Studies

Rochester City School District

Rochester, N.Y.

A version of this article appeared in the April 23, 2014 edition of Education Week as Trained Peers, Not Tests, Needed To Evaluate Teachers


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

BASE Program Site Director
Thornton, CO, US
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
Director of Information Technology
Montpelier, Vermont
Washington Central UUSD
Great Oaks AmeriCorps Fellow August 2021 - June 2022
New York City, New York (US)
Great Oaks Charter Schools
Director of Athletics
Farmington, Connecticut
Farmington Public Schools

Read Next

Assessment Opinion To Keep Primary Students Learning and Growing, Start With Data
A district’s dedication to gathering and analyzing data provides stability in uncertain times.
Janice Pavelonis
5 min read
Image shows a speech bubble divided into 4 overlapping, connecting parts.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty and Laura Baker/Education Week
Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Assessment 2021
In this Spotlight, dive into best assessment practices
and more.
Assessment Opinion Testing Students This Spring Would Be a Mistake
High-stakes tests would tell us very little we can't know in other ways, writes a longtime assessment researcher.
Lorrie A. Shepard
5 min read
Illustration of students in virus environment facing wave of test sheets.
Collage by Vanessa Solis/Education Week (Images: iStock/DigitalVision Vectors/Getty)
Assessment Opinion An Open Letter to the NAEP Governing Board
The change under consideration would make the reading test less accurate not more, writes E.D. Hirsch Jr.
E.D. Hirsch Jr.
3 min read
16Hirsch SOC
AscentXmedia/iStock/Getty Images Plus