Teaching Profession

New Pension Plans Provide Educators With Options, Risks

By Julie Blair — April 03, 2002 8 min read

Teachers and administrators in 27 states are finally free to ride the nation’s bucking financial markets after years of watching from the stands—a trip that is proving both liberating and painful.

Now that many of them have won the freedom to invest their retirement money as they like, this new generation of investors is being subjected to the volatility of the stock market, including its recent dives, along with all the other investors.

“There are macroeconomic changes—war, peace, stagflation, downsizing of the economy—that have tremendous effects on the stock market and people’s rates of retirement,” said John D. Abraham, the senior associate director of research for the American Federation of Teachers.

“What are these Enron employees going to do now?” Mr. Abraham said, referring to the collapse of the Houston-based energy giant that resulted in the loss of many employees’ life savings. “If they had defined-benefit plans, they’d all be in pretty good shape.”

Throughout much of the 1990s, educators found themselves locked into inflexible pension plans while family and friends took advantage of the booming stock market. Under those defined-benefit plans, teachers’ retirement savings were guaranteed by their employers, but they could not decide how or where to invest their money.

At about the same time, states began to replace or supplement such traditional plans with systems that allow public school educators to choose their own investment portfolios.

Such changes are an attempt by legislators to give teachers, administrators, and other school employees more control over their own savings, improve recruitment, and reduce the financial risk to state governments. They also mirror a national trend apparent in the private sector.

“States are beginning to look at ways to increase employee benefits and transfer some of the investment risk to [the employees],” said Barbara J. Perry, the vice president of public retirement plans for TIAA-CREF, a New York City-based company that handles investments for teachers in all 50 states.

“They also want to provide for more outsourcing of administrative duties,” she said

Teachers and administrators, in turn, are becoming savvier and want the option of managing their own money, Ms. Perry said. They recognize that they can take risks with their savings earlier in life and enjoy bigger payoffs, she said.

Despite the variety of investment choices, Ms. Perry added, first and foremost, workers need to be realistic about the amount of money they’ll need to retire. Then, they can make an educated decision about which type of investment plan best meets their needs.

Portability Issues

The traditional programs—defined-benefit plans—were born shortly after the Great Depression, according to Matthew P. Lathrop, the task force director for commerce and economic development for the American Legislative Exchange Council. The Washington-based organization is made up of lawmakers and other policymakers who stress free-market approaches to public policy.

Both public and private employers offered workers guaranteed retirement savings without regard to fluctuations in the market, Mr. Lathrop said.

Most teachers dedicated small amounts from their paychecks to their retirement savings, money that was matched by the state and the school district. The combined funds were then added to a pool and invested by state retirement boards in diversified portfolios.

Upon retirement, educators were due a fixed amount of savings in compliance with a complex formula, and dependent upon the number of years worked. The employer was legally obligated to pay out the expected nest egg—no matter how the investments had done in the market.

Teachers enrolled in defined-benefit plans who leave the profession before they’re fully “vested” in their plans, or who move from state to state or district to district, are at a disadvantage, Mr. Lathrop said.

Most states mandate educators stay in the plan for anywhere from six to 10 years before they can collect a portion of their savings, meaning they’re vested; all employer contributions are lost if the educator leaves before his or her specified date, Mr. Lathrop said.

Those who are vested and leave before that date often must also pay high penalty fees—in some cases, thousands of dollars— for removing their money from the state pension funds.

The scenario is the same for vested teachers who move out of state, Mr. Lathrop said.

“The guaranteed benefit is only good for those who spend a substantial part of their career with one employer,” he said. “That’s an enormous drawback in today’s economy, when even public employees are less likely to stick with a single employer.”

Moreover, defined-benefit plans don’t allow educators to choose their own investment portfolios, he said. They simply must abide by the decisions made by state boards authorized to control the investments. Such portfolios are generally safe bets, he said, but don’t grow as quickly as other, higher-risk investments that may be especially appealing to younger teachers.

States at Risk

And from many policymakers’ point of view, defined-benefit plans are particularly risky for state governments. When the market tumbles or lawmakers inadequately finance the account, states may find themselves with empty coffers and a responsibility to pay out pension checks.

Such a situation was looming in West Virginia more than a decade ago, according to David A. Haney, the executive director of the West Virginia Education Association. He worked on a state committee to overhaul the state’s retirement system.

“We had $250 million in assets, as opposed to $3.2 billion in unfunded liability,” Mr. Haney said. “It would have been just a couple of years until [the program] was apt to be bankrupt.”

In 1991,the state began offering K-12 teachers and other school employees a defined-contribution plan in place of the defined-benefit plan, he said. The arrangement was meant to benefit employees and the state alike: Educators can direct their own investments, and the state can transfer the risk to the employee.

To date, about 18,000 of the 43,000 eligible people in West Virginia participate in the new plan, Mr. Haney said. All new teachers must join the program; veteran educators have the option of participating or continuing in the old, defined- benefit plan.

Florida, Louisiana, Ohio, South Carolina, and Washington state have followed suit in offering some form of defined-contribution plan.

For example, South Carolina offers the program only to new teachers. Veterans, however, can supplement their defined-benefit plans with defined-contribution investments. Florida, meanwhile, offers employees the choice of participating in a defined-benefit or defined-contribution plan.

Twenty-one other states have kept their defined-benefit systems intact, but at the same time, have begun offering employees opportunities to take part in supplemental defined- contribution plans. The option is designed, in part, as a prerequisite for educators who are not going to get salary increases.

Some observers say they see defined-contribution plans as a tool for recruiting teachers during a period of shortages in many districts and subject areas.

“Under the [defined- benefit] pension plan, vesting required 10 years of service,” said Walter W. Kelleher, the defined-contribution coordinator for the Florida State Board of Administration, which offers pension programs to public employees. “How could we recruit anyone to Florida?” Florida’s new program has a one-year vesting requirement, he said, with the aim of attracting more educators.

Such plans “could be one way of helping to attract high-quality teachers, particularly if they’re older,” said Mildred Hudson, the chief executive officer of Recruiting New Teachers, a Belmont, Mass.-based nonprofit group that promotes such efforts. Those considering teaching as a second career would do so knowing they had the opportunity to make some money for retirement, she said.

Seeking Balance

But critics worry that states and employees who rely on defined-contribution plans will be disappointed by the results. Poor returns on investments mean that teachers have little savings.

“We support the prevailing system, namely defined-benefit plans, and a supplemental defined-contribution plan ... because you want to have a balance of sources of income for your retirement years,” said Cynthia L. Moore, a lawyer for the National Council for Teacher Retirement. The Sacramento, Calif.-based organization represents states and districts on retirement issues.

Others are concerned that teachers aren’t receiving enough instruction on the process of investing. “The state has a moral, ethical, and legal obligation to provide education about retirement and investments,” said Mr. Haney of the West Virginia Education Association. “I don’t think they’ve met that obligation.”

A study conducted in West Virginia last year, he said, showed that 50 percent of teachers did not understand how the new plan worked; 70 percent said they would like professional-development sessions on investing.

Despite such concerns, 5th grade teacher Susan B. Mathews wishes she had at least been offered the opportunity to participate in her state’s new defined-contribution plan. The program is now offered in South Carolina, but only to beginning teachers, said the educator, who works at River Springs Elementary School in a suburb of Columbia.

“I would love to have any kind of choice,” said Ms. Mathews, who has been in the profession for more than 20 years and is 54. “I do not have enough money in my retirement account. I feel like I need to work until I’m 62 to make it worth my while.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the April 03, 2002 edition of Education Week as New Pension Plans Provide Educators With Options, Risks


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
Measuring & Supporting Student Well-Being: A Researcher and District Leader Roundtable
Students’ social-emotional well-being matters. The positive and negative emotions students feel are essential characteristics of their psychology, indicators of their well-being, and mediators of their success in school and life. Supportive relationships with peers, school
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Making Digital Literacy a Priority: An Administrator’s Perspective
Join us as we delve into the efforts of our panelists and their initiatives to make digital skills a “must have” for their district. We’ll discuss with district leadership how they have kept digital literacy
Content provided by Learning.com
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
How Schools Can Implement Safe In-Person Learning
In order for in-person schooling to resume, it will be necessary to instill a sense of confidence that it is safe to return. BD is hosting a virtual panel discussing the benefits of asymptomatic screening
Content provided by BD

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Teaching Profession Nearly 9 in 10 Teachers Willing to Work in Schools Once Vaccinated, Survey Finds
Nearly half of educators who belong to the National Education Association have gotten at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.
4 min read
Nurse Sara Muela, left, administers the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine to educator Rebecca Titus at a vaccination site setup for teachers and school staff at the Berks County Intermediate Unit in Reading, Pa., on March 15, 2021.
Nurse Sara Muela, left, administers the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine to educator Rebecca Titus at a vaccination site set up for teachers and school staff in Reading, Pa., on March 15.
Matt Rourke/AP
Teaching Profession Q&A Nation's Top Teachers Discuss the Post-Pandemic Future of the Profession
Despite the difficulties this school year brought, the four finalists for the National Teacher of the Year award say they're hopeful.
11 min read
National Teacher of the Year Finalists (clockwise from top left): Alejandro Diasgranados, Juliana Urtubey, John Arthur, Maureen Stover
National Teacher of the Year Finalists (clockwise from top left): Alejandro Diasgranados, Juliana Urtubey, John Arthur, Maureen Stover
Courtesy of CCSSO
Teaching Profession Teachers Are Stressed Out, and It's Causing Some to Quit
Stress, more so than low pay, is the main reason public school teachers quit. And COVID-19 has increased the pressure.
7 min read
Image of exit doors.
Teaching Profession Opinion Should Teachers Be Prioritized for the COVID-19 Vaccine?
Not all states are moving teachers to the front of the vaccination line. Researchers discuss the implications for in-person learning.
6 min read
Teacher Lizbeth Osuna from Cooper Elementary receives the Moderna vaccine at a CPS vaccination site at Roberto Clemente High School in Chicago, Ill., Thursday, Feb. 11, 2021.
Chicago public school teacher Lizbeth Osuna receives the COVID-19 vaccine at a school vaccination site last week.
Anthony Vazquez/Chicago Sun-Times via AP