Science Federal File

Intelligent Design

By Sean Cavanagh — August 09, 2005 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Bush administration has demanded repeatedly that “scientifically based research” be the foundation for education programs and practices, a principle that is also spelled out in the No Child Left Behind Act.

Last week, though, President Bush told reporters that he supports allowing schools to teach the controversial concept of “intelligent design”—which has been flatly rejected by the nation’s top scientific organizations—alongside the theory of evolution.

Mr. Bush, in an Aug. 1 interview with Texas reporters, said that while such choices are local decisions, he favors that “both sides” be taught “so that people can understand what the debate is about.”

Critics in several states and districts have recently sought to cast doubt on the bedrock scientific theory advanced by Charles Darwin, which posits that species evolve through natural selection. Intelligent design holds that life’s origins and complexities may best be explained by the guidance of an unidentified, possibly divine, master architect.

“Part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought,” the president said. “You’re asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas. The answer is yes.”

As a presidential candidate in 2000, Mr. Bush publicly backed allowing the teaching of biblically based creationism alongside evolution.

But the president’s recent statements contrast sharply with the opinion of the vast majority of scientists, including the congressionally chartered National Academy of Sciences, which points to a mountain of evidence for evolution and describes intelligent design as a religious belief.

An individual with closer ties to the president also has rejected intelligent design as science: White House science adviser John H. Marburger III. In comments earlier this year in an online story in The American Prospect, Mr. Marburger said, “Intelligent design is not science,” and added, “I don’t regard intelligent design as a scientific topic.”

In an e-mail to Education Week after the president’s remarks, Mr. Marburger, who holds a Ph.D. in applied physics from Stanford University, stood by his comments. But he also cautioned that the president’s remarks did not present a view on whether intelligent design is a scientific theory.

“There is danger of confusing the accounts of reporters,” he said, “with what the president actually said.”

A version of this article appeared in the August 10, 2005 edition of Education Week

Events

Mathematics K-12 Essentials Forum Helping Students Succeed in Math
Student Well-Being Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: The Power of Emotion Regulation to Drive K-12 Academic Performance and Wellbeing
Wish you could handle emotions better? Learn practical strategies with researcher Marc Brackett and host Peter DeWitt.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Science From Our Research Center Students Say They Care More About STEM as They Get Older. Teachers Disagree
An EdWeek Research Center survey examined student motivation in STEM classes.
3 min read
Cropped from original illustration, silhouetted figures water a blooming STEM flower.
Danny Allison for Education Week
Science From Our Research Center Want to Motivate Students in STEM? The Way You Explain Things Matters
How teachers explain tricky math and science concepts can affect students' motivation in their STEM classes.
7 min read
Silhouetted figures water a blooming STEM flower.
Danny Allison for Education Week
Science From Our Research Center Students Don't Think Cellphones Distract Them From Learning STEM. Teachers Disagree
New surveys of teens and teachers show how far apart the two groups are on this issue.
4 min read
A teacher and student have opposite perspectives on cellphone use in school.
Danny Allison for Education Week
Science Q&A Teachers, Parents, or Peers: Who Motivates Students Most to Pursue STEM?
Encouragement from adults—like teachers, school counselors, and parents—is crucial for motivating students in STEM.
4 min read
A group of students follows their role models towards a bright STEM future.
Danny Allison for Education Week