Law & Courts

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Major Cases on Affirmative Action in Education

By Mark Walsh — January 24, 2022 3 min read
A man talks on his phone on the steps of Harvard University's Widener Library, in Cambridge, Mass. on June 26, 2020.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to take up major challenges to affirmative action in public and private universities, in two cases that will likely hold implications for race-conscious policies in K-12 education.

The justices granted review of lower-court rulings upholding the use of race in admissions at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. It appears that the high court won’t schedule arguments until its next term as its current term is already filled with blockbuster cases on abortion rights, the Second Amendment, and religion and education.

The Harvard case, involving a private university, presented only a question of whether race-conscious admissions violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The North Carolina case, involving a flagship state university, presents the question of whether such policies violate both Title VI and the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Title VI applies to federally funded schools, while the equal-protection clause applies to governmental entities. Under either provision, the principles of the court’s decision will likely apply to race-conscious policies in public elementary and secondary education, such as selective admissions in competitive schools, school zoning decisions for enrollment, and student transfers.

“Only this court can address the widespread uncertainty on the lawfulness of the increasing use of race in American schools,” a group of former Republican officials in the U.S. Department of Education’s office for civil rights wrote in a friend-of-the-court brief that discusses both K-12 and higher education race-conscious policies.

The justices took up the Harvard case, Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (No. 20-1199), despite the views of the Biden administration that a lower court had ruled correctly.

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, in Boston, had ruled in 2020 that Harvard had conducted a searching review of its use of race in admissions and had also found that race-neutral alternatives would not achieve the same results.

Meanwhile, Students for Fair Admissions, which is the challenger to affirmative action in both the Harvard and North Carolina cases, asked the high court to take up the latter case after a federal district judge upheld the state university’s consideration of race. The group sought to bypass a federal appeals court by asking the high court to consider the North Carolina case along with the Harvard case.

“This case and Harvard should be heard together,” said the group’s appeal in Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina (No. 21-707).

Edward Blum, the founder and president of SFFA, said in a statement that “It is our hope that the justices will end the use of race as an admissions factor at Harvard, UNC and all colleges and universities.”

In its 2016 decision in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (Fisher II), the Supreme Court ruled 4-3 to uphold UT’s race-conscious admissions plan, with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy writing that “considerable deference is owed to a university in defining those intangible characteristics, like student body diversity, that are central to its identity and educational mission.”

That case was decided soon after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, and with Justice Elena Kagan recused. Kennedy has since retired, and another member of the Fisher II majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, died in 2020. The court’s three newest justices—Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—have tilted the court further to the right on many issues.

The court’s decision on university admissions could set broad principles that would affect uses of race in K-12 education. Last year, for example, a group representing Asian-American parents sued the Fairfax County, Va., school district over a new admissions plan designed to boost racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, a highly selective magnet program that is considered one of the top academic high schools in the nation.

No K-12 groups weighed in on the cases at the petition stage, but they likely will now that the justices have agreed to hear arguments.

Events

Special Education Webinar Reading, Dyslexia, and Equity: Best Practices for Addressing a Threefold Challenge
Learn about proven strategies for instruction and intervention that support students with dyslexia.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Personalized Learning Webinar
No Time to Waste: Individualized Instruction Will Drive Change
Targeted support and intervention can boost student achievement. Join us to explore tutoring’s role in accelerating the turnaround. 
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools
Student Well-Being K-12 Essentials Forum Social-Emotional Learning: Making It Meaningful
Join us for this event with educators and experts on the damage the pandemic did to academic and social and emotional well-being.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Georgia Educators Plan to Sue Over the State's 'Divisive Concepts' Law
Georgia's could be the sixth lawsuit to challenge state laws limiting classroom discussion of race and racism.
3 min read
Image of a pending lawsuit.
gesrey/iStock/Getty
Law & Courts As a Skeptical Supreme Court Weighs Race in College Admissions, 'Brown' Looms Large
The cases heard Monday involve Harvard and the University of North Carolina, but a decision could be felt in K-12 education.
8 min read
Members of the NAACP Youth and College division rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court as justices heard oral arguments on two cases on whether colleges and universities can continue to consider race as a factor in admissions decisions Oct. 31, 2022.
Members of the NAACP Youth and College division rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court as justices hear oral arguments on whether colleges and universities can continue to consider race as a factor in admissions.
Francis Chung/E&E News/POLITICO via AP Images
Law & Courts 4 Things to Know About the Affirmative Action Showdown Before the Supreme Court
The justices on Monday weigh the use of race in admissions at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, with K-12 implications.
9 min read
supreme court SOC
Getty
Law & Courts What Do 'Parents' Rights' Mean Legally for Schools, Anyway?
Conservatives rely on century-old U.S. Supreme Court precedents but want to bolster parental rights with a constitutional amendment.
9 min read
A protester holds signs at a Moms for Liberty rally at the state Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa., on Oct. 9, 2021. About 100 people attended the rally to protest mask and vaccine mandates.
A protester holds signs at a Moms for Liberty rally at the state Capitol in Harrisburg, Pa., October 2021 protesting mask and vaccine mandates.
Paul Weaver/Sipa via AP Images