Law & Courts

Supreme Court Denies Appeal From 1st Grader With Disabilities Put In Chokehold by Teacher

By Mark Walsh — June 13, 2022 4 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up an appeal on behalf of Texas parents who allege that a teacher placed their son, a 1st grader with disabilities including ADHD, in a chokehold until he foamed at the mouth.

A federal magistrate judge had concluded that the teacher’s actions, in response to the 7-year-old student pushing and hitting her, “were taken in pursuit of a legitimate pedagogical purpose” of maintaining an environment conducive to learning.

The parents sued, but two lower courts dismissed claims against the district and granted qualified immunity to the teacher, holding that a student may not bring a federal claim for excessive force because state remedies were available for any excessive corporal punishment.

In T.O. v. Fort Bend Independent School District (Case No. 21-1014), lawyers for the family had urged the justices to take up the case because federal courts of appeals were divided about when and how public school students may assert federal constitutional claims alleging excessive force by school officials.

A coalition of disability rights groups, in a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the student, urged the court to take up the case, arguing that while corporal punishment has declined in Texas and other states that permit it, “the threat of excess force at school has shifted, not disappeared.”

“Today, children with disabilities far too often suffer physical and mental abuse in school,” says the brief by Disability Rights Texas and other groups. “They are struck, restrained, and isolated in numbers far beyond other children.”

Incident unfolded in a hallway

The case involves a student identified in court papers as T.O., who has attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder. His behavioral intervention plan called for him to be removed to a quiet place when his behaviors interfered with class participation.

One day in 2017, the 1st grader was removed to the hallway to calm down, accompanied by a behavioral aide. A 4th grade teacher walked by and “decided to interfere,” as T.O.’s court papers put it. The 4th grade teacher allegedly yelled at T.O., despite the aide’s comments that the situation was under control. The student sought to re-enter his classroom, pushing past the 4th grade teacher and hitting her leg, court papers say.

That is when the teacher, who weighed 260 pounds according to court papers, grabbed the 55-pound student by the neck and threw him to the ground, holding him in the chokehold and telling him he “had hit the wrong one.”

The chokehold lasted several minutes, court papers say, until others at the school intervened. T.O. went to the school nurse and had a bruised neck. Court papers say the school district conducted multiple investigations of the incident; the 4th grade teacher was not fired or disciplined.

T.O.’s parents sued the school district under federal disabilities laws and the teacher under the Fourth Amendment’s clause against unreasonable seizures and the 14th Amendment’s due-process clause.

The magistrate judge granted qualified immunity to the teacher because state law provided a separate remedy for excessive corporal punishment, and under precedents of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, in New Orleans, no federal due-process claim may be brought by a student when such a state remedy exists and the punishment was carried out for disciplinary or pedagogical purposes. The judge also dismissed claims against the school district.

A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit court unanimously affirmed, though two judges wrote concurrences noting that the circuit precedents ran counter to other federal appeals courts, which allow federal constitutional claims in school excessive force cases.

That was the emphasis of the appeal to the Supreme Court filed by T.O. and his parents.

“The 5th Circuit stands alone in holding that public school officials who use excessive force against students are completely insulated from constitutional scrutiny, so long as there is some purportedly ‘pedagogical’ or ‘disciplinary’ purpose for the use of force, if state law provides a cause of action against the school official,” the appeal said.

The disability rights groups, in their brief, argued that “teachers who are not adequately trained in de-escalation techniques and other ways to address student behavior, or who ignore their training, have too often responded to student behavior with physical and mechanical restraints, seclusion, and even resort to physical violence.”

The Fort Bend school district and the 4th grade teacher, in a brief urging the justices not to take up the case, argued that students subject to excessive discipline have adequate remedies in state courts.

“The federal constitutional rights of students in the public school setting are often limited,” the school district and teacher’s brief added. “Where a state both prohibits and remedies the use of unreasonable force against students, student disciplinary issues should be shaped by state lawmakers and local officials, rather than the individual predilections of federal jurists.”

The Supreme Court’s denial of review is not a decision on the merits of the family’s claim.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning
Budget & Finance Webinar Staffing Schools After ESSER: What School and District Leaders Need to Know
Join our newsroom for insights on investing in critical student support positions as pandemic funds expire.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How can districts build sustainable tutoring models before the money runs out?
District leaders, low on funds, must decide: broad support for all or deep interventions for few? Let's discuss maximizing tutoring resources.
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts District Can Deny Opt-Outs on LGBTQ+ Books, Court Rules
Religious parents objected to a Maryland district's policy ending opt-outs for elementary school 'storybooks' with LGBTQ+ themes.
5 min read
A pedestrian passes by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Courthouse, June 16, 2021, on Main Street in Richmond, Va.
A person walks near the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit's courthouse in Richmond, Va. A panel of the court denied an injunction seeking to restore religious parents' opportunity to opt their children out of LGBTQ+ "storybooks" in a Maryland district.
Steve Helber/AP
Law & Courts Brown v. Board of Education: 70 Years of Progress and Challenges
The milestone for the historic 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down racial segregation in schools is marked by a range of tributes
12 min read
People mill around the third floor of the Kansas Statehouse in front of a Brown v. Board of Education mural before hearing from speakers recognizing the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court case on April 29, 2024 in Topeka, Kan.
People mill around the third floor of the Kansas Statehouse in front of a Brown v. Board of Education mural before hearing from speakers recognizing the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court case on April 29, 2024 in Topeka, Kan.
Evert Nelson/The Topeka Capital-Journal via AP
Law & Courts Republican-Led States Sue to Block New Title IX Rule
A pair of lawsuits focus on the rule's protections for students' gender identity.
5 min read
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus. Four Republican-led states filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the Biden administration's new Title IX regulation, which among other things would codify protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus. Four Republican-led states filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the Biden administration's new Title IX regulation, which among other things would codify protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Patrick Orsagos/AP
Law & Courts Why It Will Now Be Easier for Educators to Sue Over Job Transfers
The case asked whether transferred employees had to show a 'significant' change in job conditions to sue under Title VII. The court said no.
8 min read
Light illuminates part of the Supreme Court building at dusk on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 16, 2022.
Light illuminates part of the Supreme Court building at dusk on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 16, 2022. The high court on Wednesday, April 17, 2024, made it easier for workers, including educators, to sue over job transfers.
Patrick Semansky/AP