Law & Courts

States Sue TikTok Over ‘Addictive’ Design Features. What That Means for Schools

By Arianna Prothero — October 09, 2024 3 min read
The United States government laws on certain social media applications such as TikTok
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The newest legal battle against social media platforms—this time against TikTok—could have a trickle-down effect for schools where some of the alleged harms of social media often play out.

But first, the 13 states and the District of Columbia that have filed a series of lawsuits will have to prove their claims that TikTok is intentionally designed to be addictive to kids. And those addictive features, the lawsuits say, are harming kids’ mental health.

The lawsuits against TikTok are another effort targeting social media algorithms, which prioritize the posts individual users see on their social feeds based on how likely people are to engage with the content. California passed a law last month requiring parental consent for algorithmic feeds on minors’ social media accounts. Forty-one states sued Meta a year ago over similar issues. And algorithms are featured in several lawsuits filed by school districts across the country against the major social media companies.

It’s a full-court press that legal observers have likened to the cascade of lawsuits, oftentimes led by school districts, against e-cigarette manufacturers four years ago.

“For young people in particular, their brains are still developing,” said Danny Weiss, the chief advocacy officer for Common Sense Media, a nonprofit that focuses on the impact of technology on youth. “It’s very difficult if not impossible for them to resist the temptations with these powerful algorithms that are based on millions and millions of bits of information about the user to then drive that user to stay engaged […] and drive them to places that kids themselves have not chosen to go that can be harmful.”

The more time someone spends on a platform, the more money the social media company makes, he said.

How schools are impacted by kids’ social media use

Kids’ deteriorating mental health hurts their ability to learn and requires districts to spend more money on mental health supports, according to a lawsuit filed by the Seattle school district, the first district to sue the major social media companies. Social media has indirectly led to school property being damaged, either as a result of kids acting out of mental health issues, as some district-led lawsuits claim, or trends on social media that challenge students to vandalize bathrooms or steal school property.

This latest round of lawsuits against TikTok are the culmination of an investigation by a bipartisan group of state attorneys general. Other design elements in TikTok targeted by the lawsuits include push notifications that buzz and entice users onto the app, the infinite-scroll feature which serves up a never-ending feed of curated content to keep users engaged, and face filters that create unrealistic and unhealthy expectations for young users.

See also

Vector illustration concept of 3 students and a cell phone being unplugged from the internet.
iStock/Getty

But TikTok says those claims are inaccurate and misleading, and in a statement, pointed to several actions the company has taken to protect teens using its product as proof of its commitment to its youngest users’ health and safety.

“We provide robust safeguards, proactively remove suspected underage users, and have voluntarily launched safety features such as default screen-time limits, family pairing, and privacy by default for minors under 16,” said Alex Haurek, a spokesperson for TikTok, in an email. “We’ve endeavored to work with the attorneys general for over two years, and it is incredibly disappointing they have taken this step rather than work with us on constructive solutions to industrywide challenges.”

Children under 13 are not allowed to create accounts on TikTok, although younger children often bypass these controls.

TikTok is facing an additional legal challenge distinct from other major social media companies. The app could be banned in the U.S. if its China-based parent company, ByteDance, doesn’t sell TikTok before then under a new federal law. That law is being challenged in court.

While Weiss thinks this lawsuit is a positive development, it will be a long time before schools see the effects of the lawsuit—should the plaintiffs even succeed. But, he said, schools now have an opportunity to discuss with students how social media platforms work and how to use them in a healthy manner.

“These lawsuits are giving teachers an opportunity to say, ‘Let’s talk about TikTok. Let’s talk about Instagram,’” he said. “Engage young people in a conversation about what’s going on, and then say, ‘Did you notice in these lawsuits that they talk about the beauty filter, or they talk about the algorithm? Do you understand what that is? And what are some things you can do to try to move away from the parts that are less healthy for you, and just try to emphasize the parts that are healthier for you.’ It’s a really great teaching moment.”

Events

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts What Schools Need to Know About the Supreme Court’s Transgender Sports Ruling
The justices upheld two state laws that bar transgender girls from participating in female sports.
10 min read
A group prays outside of the Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
A group prays outside of the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, in Washington. The court upheld two state laws barring transgender girls from joining girls' school sports teams.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts Judges Strike Down Trump Admin.'s Student Loan Forgiveness Overhaul
Two judges sided with advocates who said the program risked becoming a tool for political retribution.
3 min read
In this May 5, 2018, file photo, graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio.
Graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio, on May 5, 2018. Two judges have ruled against the Trump administration's overhaul of a public service loan forgiveness program for which teachers have qualified.
Carlos Osorio/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Rejecting Trump's Proposed Limits
The justices relied on the 14th Amendment and federal law to rule that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen.
4 min read
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The Supreme Court justices will take the bench Monday, July 1, 2024, to release their last few opinions of the term, including their most closely watched case: whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from criminal prosecution.
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The high court, on June 30, 2026, rejected President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Law & Courts States Can Ban Transgender Athletes, Supreme Court Decides
The court ruled that state bans in Idaho and West Virginia don’t violate the Constitution or Title IX.
3 min read
People advocate for a ban on transgender women and girls participating in women's and girls' sports outside the U.S. Supreme Court building as the court announced decisions in Washington, on June 29, 2026.
People advocate for a ban on transgender women and girls participating in women's and girls' sports outside the U.S. Supreme Court building as the court announced decisions in Washington, on June 29, 2026. The Supreme Court ruled on June 30, 2026, that states may enforce laws restricting transgender athletes’ participation on girls’ and women’s sports teams.
Francis Chung/Politico via AP