Federal

Choice Option of U.S. Law Used, Report Finds

By Caroline Hendrie — May 19, 2004 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

More families are benefiting from the school choice mandates of the No Child Left Behind Act than is generally recognized, despite the highly uneven response to the transfer requirements from school districts and states, a report released last week concludes.

The report concludes that the federal requirement that students in underperforming public schools be given the choice to attend higher-achieving ones is offering “an immediate benefit” to thousands of low-income and minority students while contributing to “racial, ethnic, and economic desegregation.” It was released by the Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights, a Washington watchdog group that monitors enforcement of federal civil rights laws.

“Choosing Better Schools: A Report on Student Transfers Under the No Child Left Behind Act,” from the Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights. (Requires Adobe’s Acrobat Reader.)

Yet the commission also recommends a series of changes both to the law and how it is enforced. Congress should require states and districts to ensure that children from schools deemed “in need of improvement” under the law can cross district lines to enroll in better schools, the report says.

The existing policy of requiring districts to pursue interdistrict transfer agreements if they lack enough solidly achieving schools is “the least efficacious NCLB choice requirement,” it says.

Little Help from States

“The impact of this flabby policy is severe because in a great many cases, school districts with large numbers of low-performing schools are surrounded by more affluent districts with high-performing schools,” argues the report, which was written chiefly by Cynthia G. Brown, a consultant who served for 15 years as the director of educational equity for the Washington- based Council of Chief State School Officers.

See Also...

See the accompanying table, “Integration and Student Transfers.”

The commission concluded that most states ranked the choice provisions as a low priority and did little to help districts carry them out effectively. And while it cites some districts that it believes are doing an exemplary job of complying with the law, the commission strongly criticizes others for discouraging transfers.

For example, some districts have gone so far as to violate the law’s requirement that they provide transportation for transfers, the report says.

Still, the commission concludes in its 130-page report that the choice provisions are often enabling poor and minority youngsters to move to schools with less poverty and greater diversity. That is seen as an especially promising feature of the law by the 22-year-old commission, which has long pressed for greater racial and ethnic integration in schools.

Data Incomplete

Based on its survey, which yielded responses from 47 states and 137 selected school districts, the commission could confirm that some 70,000 students exercised choice under the federal law during the current school year.

But because of incomplete data from many locales, that figure greatly underestimates the actual number of students who applied to transfer or actually did so, according to the report.

In places for which the commission received complete data for both years, the report says that the proportion of students who requested transfers under the law rose from 2.3 percent to 6.2 percent from 2002-03 to 2003-04, or from 16,038 students to 53,604.

“An extraordinary number of parents are seeking transfers, and they are doing so because they know the new schools will provide a better opportunity for success,” said William L. Taylor, a Washington civil rights lawyer who chairs the commission.

Yet the commission found that far more students applied than actually changed schools. Again based on partial data, the report says, 1.7 percent of eligible students transferred to higher-performing schools this school year in selected states and districts for which complete information was available, “less than half of the 5.6 percent of eligible students who had requested transfers.”

But the report also cautions that, "[b]ecause so few districts with large enrollments submitted complete data for both school years on the number of students actually transferring, the percentages calculated by the commission are of little use.”

Noting that its work was hampered by incomplete data, the commission called on the U.S. Department of Education to “enforce the data collection and reporting provisions of the law.”

It also urged the department to “conduct compliance reviews of states and districts reporting very little school choice taking place relative to the numbers of schools in need of improvement.”

A version of this article appeared in the May 19, 2004 edition of Education Week as Choice Option of U.S. Law Used, Report Finds

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Personalized Learning Webinar
Differentiation That Delivers: Proven Practices From High-Growth Districts
Make every minute count. Proven strategies from educators and leaders driving real student growth. Save your seat!
Content provided by i-Ready, Curriculum Associates
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
From Exposure to Experience: Designing Accessible Work-Based Learning
Learn how schools can create meaningful experiences that help every student build skills, connections, and a clearer path to their future.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
A Tale of Two School Districts: Forecasting Enrollment
Forecasting enrollment is hard. Here’s how two different districts are navigating times of change with data that considers the whole picture.
Content provided by Zonda Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Q&A A Top Democrat Breaks Down His Party's Plans for K-12 in a House Majority
If Democrats retake the House, Rep. Bobby Scott may be in a position to set his chamber’s K-12 agenda.
5 min read
Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil held by the Chesapeake Coalition of Black Pastors at The Mount (Mount Lebanon Baptist Church) in Chesapeake, Va., Sunday, Nov. 27, 2022, for the six people killed at a Walmart in Chesapeake, Va., when a manager opened fire with a handgun before an employee meeting Tuesday night.
Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil in Chesapeake, Va., on Nov. 27, 2022. Scott is the ranking Democrat on the U.S. House of Representatives' education committee and will seek the panel's chairmanship if Democrats win a House majority in next month's elections.
Carolyn Kaster/AP
Federal What a Democratic Congress Could Mean for Trump's K-12 Agenda
They may try to reverse—or at least investigate—the Trump admin.'s efforts to dismantle the Ed. Dept.
9 min read
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the top Democrat in the Republican-majority House, is joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., chair of the House Democratic Caucus, as they criticize President Donald Trump and his policies while talking to reporters about the approaching midterm election, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2026.
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 17, 2026. He's joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., who chairs the House Democratic Caucus. If Democrats gain a majority of either chamber of Congress after next month's elections, they'll be able to hold oversight hearings on and launch investigations into the dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Federal The Future of Education Research: More Partisan and Largely Left to States?
As Trump administration works to change federal grants, outside researchers try to regroup.
6 min read
Image of file folders with tabs called "funding" "grants" "projects" and a blank note paper paperclipped to the outside.
Collage by Laura Baker/Education Week + Getty
Federal Bipartisan Bill in Congress Would Help Schools Put Cellphone Bans or Restrictions in Place
The bill would establish a federal grant program to support state efforts to restrict cellphones.
5 min read
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, center, is joined from left by Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., the GOP whip, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as he speaks to reporters ahead of a Wednesday meeting with President Donald Trump, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 23, 2026.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., speaks to reporters ahead of a meeting with President Donald Trump at the Capitol in Washington on June 23, 2026. Cotton is one of the sponsors of a bipartisan bill that would create a grant program for states to implement school cellphone bans or restrictions.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP