School & District Management

New Orleans Panel Rethinks School System

By Catherine Gewertz — January 10, 2006 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Four months after Hurricane Katrina wiped out large sections of New Orleans, an early outline of a newly configured school system is beginning to emerge—and it looks unlike any other district.

The plan under consideration inverts the typical arrangement, in which schools make up the bottom of the organizational chart, with a broad middle-management layer above them, and the superintendent and school board on top.

Scheduled to be put in final form this week by an education committee of the mayor’s rebuilding commission, the plan envisions a district composed of clusters of schools, each run by a network manager who provides needed support and services. The clusters would be overseen by a chief executive officer and a school board whose job is to serve the schools.

“Rebuilding and Transforming—Presenting a Plan for Public Education in New Orleans” is posted by the Bring New Orleans Back Education Commission.

Administration would be pared to a minimum. A “services group” would provide financial, transportation, and other key services. A “strategy group”—the CEO and a handful of other employees—would be in charge of academics, finances, accountability, and communications.

Principals would have the power to hire whom they chose, and would control 80 cents of every budgetary dollar. Schools would have to use the district for a few essential services, such as financial systems, but could choose the district or outside providers for the rest.

The arrangement is an attempt to create “a bottom-up focus on schools rather than dictating from the top down,” and a “focus on strategic management vs. comprehensive control,” says a draft of the plan being discussed by the education steering committee of Mayor C. Ray Nagin’s Bring New Orleans Back Commission.

The steering committee expected to complete its report this week and to present it to the mayor’s full commission on Jan. 17.

Tulane University President Scott Cowen, who chairs the steering committee, said last week he was talking with Louisiana’s state schools superintendent, Cecil J. Picard, and with Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco’s Louisiana Recovery Authority, to align the various plans under development as the vision for New Orleans schools evolves.

Mr. Cowen said he also hoped to coordinate with the local school board, which has a vastly reduced zone of authority now that the state is in charge of most of the district’s schools. (“La. Lawmakers OK Plan to Give State Control of Most New Orleans Schools,” Nov. 30, 2005.)

A Work in Progress

More than 5,000 children were enrolled in one regular school and nine charter schools in New Orleans as of last week, less than 10 percent of the district’s pre-Katrina enrollment, but climbing. Another seven schools were scheduled to open by the end of the month.

The image of what the city’s school system will look like is still far from clear. The steering committee’s plan, for instance, suggested abolishing New Orleans’ elected school board in favor of an all-appointed panel. But a later version of the plan prepared for presentation to state officials softened that approach, and included the possibility of a mixture of appointed and elected board members.

Schools Move to Head of the Class

A plan under consideration for New Orleans would emphasize networks of schools, not bureaucracy.

*Click image to enlarge.

BRIC ARCHIVE

SOURCE: Boston Consulting Group

The committee must remain open to various possibilities, Mr. Cowen said, to manage potential legal and logistical difficulties. On the school board’s makeup, for instance, state law would need to be changed to permit appointed members.

The steering committee believes strongly that “one single, aligned governing body” is crucial to the success of the New Orleans schools, said Mark R. Hoffman, a Boston Consulting Group vice president who is coordinating the committee’s efforts. Exactly how to ensure such governance in a district where most of the schools will answer to state-contracted groups, and a minority will answer to the local board, is unknown, Mr. Hoffman acknowledged.

Paul T. Hill, a University of Washington professor of public affairs who has studied district design, called the steering committee’s plan sensible and an idea that “could be a model for struggling urban districts elsewhere.” But he cautioned that personnel choices could buoy or sink the concept.

“Everything depends on who the people are and how they perform,” he wrote in an e-mail last week.

In building their plan, steering-committee members sought the views of more than 1,000 principals, teachers, students, and parents through town hall meetings, focus groups, surveys, and interviews, even traveling to Baton Rouge, La., and to Houston to seek out displaced residents. They reviewed research on best practices in urban education, and received advice from school leaders in Chicago; New York City; Norfolk, Va.; Oakland, Calif.; and Philadelphia.

But to some, the result doesn’t feel like a good fit for New Orleans.

Phyllis Landrieu, a New Orleans school board member who also serves on the steering committee, said she doesn’t think the plan takes into account factors about the city’s unique situation, such as its profound financial problems.

“It’s a great idea, but it doesn’t apply to us,” she said.

But Mr. Cowen of Tulane sees the plan as a good approach for the city, given the unprecedented scale of the rebuilding task for its school system.

“The network model is a vision for farther out, as well as closer up,” he said. “It’s flexible enough that we can start moving in that direction right now. We can organize the schools we have into networks” and build from there, he said.

Marla R. Ucelli, the director of district redesign at the Annenberg Institute for School Reform in Providence, R.I., said she was impressed that the New Orleans plan is “a real effort to bring best practice to a new district.”

But she was also skeptical that it would survive in its original form when implemented, because it fails to consider certain key challenges, such as collective bargaining agreements, attracting and compensating high-quality staff, and ensuring equitable distribution of resources for schools and options for children.

Events

Special Education Webinar Reading, Dyslexia, and Equity: Best Practices for Addressing a Threefold Challenge
Learn about proven strategies for instruction and intervention that support students with dyslexia.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Families & the Community Webinar
How Whole-Child Student Data Can Strengthen Family Connections
Learn how district leaders can use these actionable strategies to increase family engagement in their student’s education and boost their academic achievement.
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
The School to Workforce Gap: How Are Schools Setting Students Up For Life & Lifestyle Success?
Hear from education and business leaders on how schools are preparing students for their leap into the workforce.
Content provided by Find Your Grind

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management Opinion Pursue School Improvement Through Persuasion. Not Vilification
Neither haranguing opponents nor talking solely to the like-minded is likely to change minds or locate common ground.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
School & District Management District Pays $50,000 Fine to Scrub Confederate Leaders' Names From Schools
The fine to Montgomery, Ala., schools stems from a 2017 state law designed to preserve public memorials.
4 min read
A pedestal that held a statue of Robert E. Lee stands empty outside a high school named for the Confederate general in Montgomery, Ala. on Tuesday, June 2, 2020. Two Montgomery high schools will no longer bear the names of Confederate leaders. The Montgomery County Board of Education has voted for new names for Jefferson Davis High School and Robert E Lee High School, news outlets report.
In this June 2020 photo, a pedestal that held a statue of Robert E. Lee stands empty outside a high school named for the Confederate general in Montgomery, Ala. The Montgomery school board voted this month to pay a hefty fine to the state in order to rename Robert E. Lee High and another school named for Confederate leader Jefferson Davis.
Kim Chandler/AP
School & District Management Principals Give Thanks—and Shoutouts—to School Support Staff
Custodians, lunchroom aides, secretaries, and bus drivers are “too often forgotten and underappreciated.”
7 min read
Image of a framed smiley face.
zakokor/iStock/Getty
School & District Management How to Recruit and Retain School Board Members of Color
Pay, staffing, and support are key ingredients to persuade people of color to run for their local school board, experts say.
5 min read
Illustration showing diversity with multi-colored human figures.
ajijchan/iStock/Getty