Report Roundup

Ed. Trust Examines State Funding Gaps

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments
| Includes correction(s).

Funding Gaps 2007

Sixteen states spent at least $200 less per student in low-income school districts than on students in high-income districts between 1999 and 2005, concludes a studyRequires Adobe Acrobat Reader by the Education Trust, a Washington-based nonprofit research organization.

In addition, the report found that in 21 states, school districts with a large minority population received less money than school districts with small minority populations—and in eight states, high-minority districts received at least $1,000 less per student in state funding.

The study also found that 10 states narrowed the spending gap between low-income and high-income students by spending at least $200 more per student in low-income school districts. In the six years the report examined, Maryland, Ohio, and Wyoming were found to have done the best job closing their funding gaps, eventually spending more on high-poverty districts than on low-poverty districts.

The report, the seventh in a series of annual reports by the Education Trust, investigated the “funding gap” by comparing the resources states committed to low-income and high-minority school districts with the amount spent on districts with a low percentage of students in need. The data for the report were taken from the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Department of Education’s information on the amount spent by each state and local government on each of the nation’s 14,000 school districts.

Vol. 27, Issue 20, Page 5

Published in Print: January 23, 2008, as Ed. Trust Examines State Funding Gaps
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

An earlier version of this story should have said that that 16 states have seen their funding gaps between low-income and upper-income school districts increase by at least $200 per student. Likewise, it should have said that 10 states have narrowed such gaps by spending at least $200 more per student in low-income districts.

Most Popular Stories