Data Systems: They’re Not Just About Students Anymore

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A growing body of research highlights the classroom teacher as one of the most important predictors of student success. While research and policy conversations increasingly focus on the vital relationship between teacher and student, most of our current data systems are unable to inform these discussions. Only 18 states report the ability to connect their teacher data with student data in any grade, and even fewer actually use the resulting information to inform policy and practice.

One of the most important elements of a longitudinal-data system is the ability to collect and use quality information on educators over time and, most importantly, to relate the performance of teacher and students; the identification of the most effective teachers makes possible the study of any differences in their training, professional development, and teaching practices as compared with those of other teachers. Only when we have longitudinal-data systems that connect teacher and student data will we be able to guide our investments—of time, training, and even compensation—based on evidence that those investments reap the ultimate benefit: increased student achievement.

Vol. 27

Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Quality Counts is produced with support from the Pew Center on the States.

Most Popular Stories