Letter

True School Reform Is Not Against Teacher Interests

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

To the Editor:

Paul J. Phillips, the president of the Quincy (Mass.) Education Association, writes in his Feb. 28, 2007, letter to the editor that reformers he calls “anti-unionists” are against the interests of teachers. He has it backwards.

An improved education system—what reformers are working toward—supports the outstanding teachers who struggle to achieve success amid the rigors and roadblocks of the current underperforming and monopolistic system.

In Mr. Phillips’ view, reformers paint a picture of teachers’ unions’ efforts for change that is limited solely to measures that feed their self-interest, such as the move for smaller class sizes. What he might consider instead is the need to put more money on what incontrovertible evidence proves to be effective in better educating children: high-performing teachers in every classroom.

We need to attract and retain the best teachers possible. A change in the archaic salary chart and tenure system would go a long way toward both finding and keeping these teachers. Instead of rewarding teachers who have merely “stuck it out,” why not financially reward those who have made verifiable accomplishments in their students’ education? This provides incentives to achieve, and also is a great recruiting tool to encourage the best and brightest college students to consider a career in teaching.

Mr. Phillips says that educators “should not take the easy way.” We agree. It is time to look at education in a whole new light. If that light shows that the existing system is not working, we should take the more difficult route of approaching problems in new and innovative ways, with greater concentration on the interests of children than on the archaic structure that now surrounds them at school.

Steven R. Maggi
Director
Education Reform Center
Evergreen Freedom Foundation
Olympia, Wash.

Vol. 26, Issue 29, Page 31

Published in Print: March 28, 2007, as True School Reform Is Not Against Teacher Interests
Related Stories

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >