Ed. Dept. Shows Relationship Between NAEP, TIMSS

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

For the first time, 40 states and the District of Columbia can see how their 8th graders stack up in math and science against students in 41 nations worldwide.

With state policymakers, business leaders, and others looking for ways to benchmark students' academic progress in an international context, a research study released last week by the U.S. Department of Education is a "very powerful tool," said Gary W. Phillips, an associate commissioner in the department's National Center for Education Statistics.

For More Information:
The report linking TIMSS with NAEP can be found on the World Wide Web at www.nces.ed.gov.

As states try to decipher how good is good enough for students' performance in core subjects, it can be useful to look at how other countries, or economic competitors, do, state and federal officials said.

The report presents data on how the 40 states whose students took the National Assessment of Educational Progress in 1996 would have done had they participated in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, which 41 countries took in 1995. Minnesota, Missouri, and Oregon students actually took the international exam.

For each of the states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and Department of Defense schools, the report lists those countries that would have been expected to perform higher, not significantly different, and lower than that state or jurisdiction had it taken TIMSS. For example, it tries to answer the question of where Arizona falls in relation to Canada. The study also details what percentage of students in the state would have performed in the upper half of students and in the top 10 percent of students taking TIMSS.

Minnesota, with actual results, and Alaska virtually tied for the largest proportions of students falling into those categories for math performance in the 8th grade. In science, Minnesota's actual results showed that about 20 percent of its students would have scored in the top 10 percent of takers of TIMSS--the largest proportion among the states.

No 4th Grade Link

To make the link between the two tests, statisticians used a mathematical formula to translate performance on one test into performance on the other--much the same way that the conversion is made between tem-peratures expressed in degrees Fahrenheit and degrees Celsius.

It helped greatly, officials said, to be able to check the link by looking at the actual results of Minnesota, which took TIMSS in 1995, and Missouri and Oregon, which took a special administration of the international exams last year.

The National Center for Education Statistics did not explicitly rank states by their international performance. "We don't want to set up that horse race because we feel there's too much error in the data," Mr. Phillips said. But "we think this methodology is sufficiently robust to be able to do these comparisons" of how states would have done on TIMSS.

Mr. Phillips emphasized that the way the Education Department did the linking was just one way of doing it and that the extrapolation of NAEP to TIMSS scores represented a cutting-edge methodology.

At the same time, the statistics center has been unsuccessful in linking states' performance on the 4th grade NAEP with the performance of 4th graders taking TIMSS. Researchers have yet to figure out why.

The ability to connect performance on a national exam such as NAEP to the international ones holds significance for the future success of the Clinton administration's proposed voluntary national tests in 4th grade reading and 8th grade math. A major selling point of the national tests has been that individual students taking them would be able to know how they would have fared had they taken TIMSS. But the tests have powerful opponents in Congress and face a dubious future.

Oregon to Singapore

The international comparison provides a useful frame of reference for Oregon, said Stephen Slater, an assessment specialist for the state education department there. "Economically, Oregon is not just competing with Texas and Massachusetts and California," he said. "We are competing globally, and so Singapore is just as valid a comparison group as the state of Washington."

Vol. 17, Issue 35, Page 8

Published in Print: May 13, 1998, as Ed. Dept. Shows Relationship Between NAEP, TIMSS
Related Stories
Web Resources
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >