Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Infrastructure

Court Leaves Future of Online-Protection Law Uncertain

By Mark Walsh — May 22, 2002 3 min read

The U.S. Supreme Court last week partially upheld a federal statute designed to protect children from pornography on the World Wide Web, but its splintered ruling sent the law back to a lower court for further review and left doubt about whether it would ultimately be upheld.

At issue in Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union (Case No. 00-1293) was the Child Online Protection Act, a 1999 statute that makes it a crime for commercial Web sites to make sexually explicit materials available to minors. The law seeks to restrict “material that is harmful to minors” based on “contemporary community standards.”

No opinion of the court commanded a majority, but Justice Clarence Thomas said in the main opinion that the law’s reliance on community standards did not automatically render it in violation of the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, in Philadelphia, had ruled.

The Supreme Court continued to bar the law from taking effect and ordered the 3rd Circuit court to consider several other issues raised in the challenge to the law by free-speech advocates.

“The scope of our decision today is quite limited,” Justice Thomas said in the May 13 ruling.

Only Justice John Paul Stevens said he would uphold the 3rd Circuit ruling that struck down the statute on its face. He said a community standard, which comes from the court’s obscenity decisions of the 1970s, could not be applied to the borderless world of cyberspace.

“In the context of the Internet, ... community standards become a sword, rather than a shield,” Justice Stevens said. “If a prurient appeal is offensive in a Puritan village, it may be a crime to post it on the World Wide Web.”

The case points up the difficulty of regulating speech on the Internet. The high court in 1997 struck down Congress’ first attempt to protect children from sexually explicit material online. It said the 1996 Communication Decency Act suppressed a large amount of speech that was legal for adults to receive.

The Child Online Protection Act, or COPA, was challenged by a coalition of free-speech advocates and commercial Web site operators, who argued that it was still overly broad. The 3rd Circuit court ruled that because Web sites cannot limit their reach by geography, the law’s reliance on community standards for determining what would be harmful to minors made it unconstitutional.

Four separate Supreme Court opinions in the case agreed only that the 3rd Circuit should give COPA a more thorough review. Justice Thomas, joined by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justice Antonin Scalia, said the community-standards approach could be workable without violating the First Amendment.

Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Stephen G. Breyer each wrote opinions suggesting that the First Amendment would require the law to define a national standard for what materials on the Web would be harmful to minors.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, in an opinion joined by Justices David H. Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, raised doubts that the law would ultimately be upheld. He also raised the issue of how to apply the requirement, from the court’s obscenity cases, of evaluating a challenged work “as a whole” when the work at issue was a Web site.

Sex Discrimination

Separately last week, the court declined to hear the appeal by female athletes who unsuccessfully sought damages from the University of Minnesota in a Title IX case over sports equity.

Six former athletes alleged in a lawsuit that the university’s Duluth campus violated Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in schools receiving federal funds, by maintaining unequal sports opportunities for women.

Both a federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, in St. Louis, ruled that the women could not win damages. The 8th Circuit court said the university was not “deliberately indifferent” to its Title IX compliance obligations because it was responsive to a complaint from the federal Department of Education’s office for civil rights.

The appeal was Grandson v. University of Minnesota (No. 01-1261).

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the May 22, 2002 edition of Education Week as Court Leaves Future of Online-Protection Law Uncertain

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

BASE Program Site Director
Thornton, CO, US
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
Director of Information Technology
Montpelier, Vermont
Washington Central UUSD
Great Oaks AmeriCorps Fellow August 2021 - June 2022
New York City, New York (US)
Great Oaks Charter Schools
Director of Athletics
Farmington, Connecticut
Farmington Public Schools

Read Next

Infrastructure Internet Access Is a Civil Rights Issue
In the world’s wealthiest country, why is broadband access denied to so many and in such high numbers? Mark Lieberman investigates.
7 min read
v40 6BI ML IMG
Illustration by Jamiel Law
Infrastructure Schools Handed Out Millions of Digital Devices Under COVID-19. Now, Thousands Are Missing
Some districts are scrambling to account for thousands of devices—a task made more urgent by the uncertainty over when students will be able to return to school buildings full-time.
5 min read
1 Laptops ARTICLE
Getty
Infrastructure How to Address Big Tech Equity Challenges
School districts are facing huge tech equity issues this school year, especially if schools return to full-time remote learning. Here’s how they are addressing those challenges.
7 min read
Sam Urban Wittrock, a history teacher at W.W. Samuell High School in Dallas, shows an example of one of the many WiFi hotspot devices his school district is giving to students. Schools nationwide are gearing up to do a better job this academic year making sure digital devices and WiFi access are available to all students.
Sam Urban Wittrock, a history teacher at W.W. Samuell High School in Dallas, shows an example of one of the many WiFi hotspot devices his school district is giving to students. Schools nationwide are gearing up to do a better job this academic year making sure digital devices and WiFi access are available to all students.
Tony Gutierrez/AP
Infrastructure Should Schools Pay for Teachers' Internet Access?
A nationally representative EdWeek Research Center survey found that just 1 percent of teachers said their school or district was paying for their high-speed, wireless internet at home.
5 min read
32internet img getty (1)
iStock/Getty Images Plus