Ed-Tech Policy

Congress Expected To Put High Priority on Technology

By Andrew Trotter — February 17, 1999 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Education technology will figure even more prominently in this year’s revamping of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act than it did in the bill’s last overhaul, in 1994, according to staff members on Capitol Hill and at the Department of Education.

“The word ‘technology’ will appear in just about every title in ESEA,” predicted Sherry Kaiman, a staff member for the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.

In addition to being mingled throughout the various sections of the major federal K-12 law, first passed in 1965, technology may keep its own separate title. But there is also some interest by members of Congress and the Clinton administration in consolidating technology grant programs into fewer, broader grants, which would add flexibility to schools’ use of the aid.

Title III of the esea, added five years ago, provides for much of the federal government’s support of education technology, including the Technology Literacy Challenge Fund. Since 1996, the fund has delivered over $1 billion to the states, which award grants competitively to school districts.

At a HELP Committee hearing on the ESEA last week, Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley said the Education Department would try to focus more of the challenge fund on poor students.

Some merging of small technology programs may also be proposed when the administration submits its detailed reauthorization plan next month, Mr. Riley said.

Professional Development

Other administration priorities will include making a special effort to address the needs of rural schools, by supporting technologies such as distance learning; coordinating ESEA technology programs with another federal program to help students with disabilities; and helping teachers integrate technology into their daily lesson plans, Secretary Riley said.

He cited a recent finding by the National Center for Education Statistics that “currently only 20 percent of our teachers feel qualified to integrate technology throughout the curriculum.” The proposal for Title III would support state and local efforts to improve teacher quality, including the formation of partnerships between school districts and institutes of higher education.

At least 30 percent of the $450 million the administration has proposed for the challenge fund in its fiscal 2000 budget would go to projects to improve teachers’ command of technology.

The department would also strengthen evaluation efforts to find proven and promising models for using technology to support education reform in the classroom, Mr. Riley said.

Legislative Concerns

As they begin to draft language for the ESEA reauthorization, staff members of the key committees of both houses--HELP in the Senate and the House Education and the Workforce Committee--say Congress will be looking hard at several questions: the quality of teacher training in technology; the availability of solid curricular content using technology; and evidence, such as improvements in students’ test scores and success in the workforce, that technology is an effective educational tool.

In an early proposal for the ESEA, Rep. Constance A. Morella, R-Md., introduced a bill in the House last week that would require technology to be incorporated into any ESEA-funded teacher-preparation programs.

Michelle Richards, a lobbyist at the National School Boards Association, said her group would advocate giving school boards more flexibility in deciding how to use federal aid for technology and less red tape in applying for it.

But putting technology dollars into block grants to states, she said, would give budget-cutters the upper hand over the many congressional boosters of school technology.

Federal targeting is still necessary, she added. “For the foreseeable future, the federal role is critical, in providing equity and being able to provide some sort of analysis to decide which programs are good, what kinds of programs to be scaled up.”

The technological profile of schools has changed significantly since the current version of the ESEA was written in 1993, before the Internet was widely known or the World Wide Web had been created. Since then, schools’ Internet access has increased from less than 1 percent of all classrooms to 44 percent of classrooms.

The federal program of “E-rate” discounts has also contributed to the use of school technology. The government is in the process of handing out $1.9 billion in discounts for the education rate’s first year, which will further expand the capacity of schools to use advanced telecommunications.

A version of this article appeared in the February 17, 1999 edition of Education Week as Congress Expected To Put High Priority on Technology

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Integrating and Interpreting MTSS Data: How Districts Are Designing Systems That Identify Student Needs
Discover practical ways to organize MTSS data that enable timely, confident MTSS decisions, ensuring every student is seen and supported.
Content provided by Panorama Education
Artificial Intelligence Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: AI Could Be Your Thought Partner
How can educators prepare young people for an AI-powered workplace? Join our discussion on using AI as a cognitive companion.
Student Well-Being & Movement K-12 Essentials Forum How Schools Are Teaching Students Life Skills
Join this free virtual event to explore creative ways schools have found to seamlessly integrate teaching life skills into the school day.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy Do School Cellphone Bans Work? What Early Findings Tell Us
A pair of research projects look at the impact on discipline and academic achievement.
6 min read
Student Keiran George uses her cellphone as she steps outside the Ramon C. Cortines School of Visual and Performing Arts High School in downtown Los Angeles on Aug. 13, 2024.
Student Keiran George uses her cellphone as she steps outside the Ramon C. Cortines School of Visual and Performing Arts High School in downtown Los Angeles on Aug. 13, 2024. California last year approved limits on the use of the devices in schools.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
Ed-Tech Policy AI Is Changing Teaching, But Few Labor Contracts Reflect It
Classroom educators are using artificial intelligence to help with their work, yet union agreements have not caught up.
7 min read
Flat isometric design of Artificially intelligent robot-Document Analysis-data analysis concept-contracts
DigitalVision Vectors
Ed-Tech Policy Most Students Now Face Cellphone Limits at School. What Happens Next?
New state policies to restrict cellphone use in schools are driven by bipartisan support.
Set of contemporary smartphones. Black and white mobile smartphones on dark background. Mobile phones in stack on dark table, top view
iStock/Getty Images
Ed-Tech Policy How One Principal Got Kids to Pay Attention in Class
Utah principal Shauna Haney brought about one of the first classroom cellphone bans in the state.
2 min read
Cellphone wearing a sleep mask. Cellphone policy.
Irina Shatilova/iStock