Assessment

Tenn. ‘Value Added’ System Survives Legislative Attack

By Catherine Gewertz — June 09, 2004 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Tennessee legislature has passed a bill to continue the state’s widely recognized “value added” assessment system.

Enacted in the early 1990s, the system measures the academic growth that students make from the beginning to the end of the school year, based on standardized tests. Previous legislation would have done away with the system, in part because of questions about its reliability. (“Tennessee Reconsiders Value-Added Assessment System,” March 3, 2004.)

The measure awaiting Gov. Phil Bredesen’s signature late last week, Senate Bill 3395 and House Bill 3511, would commit the state to a two-dimensional accountability system.

First, public schools and districts would have to make “adequate yearly progress,” as required under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. In addition, they would have to meet “academic growth” targets in each tested subject and grade, with growth determined by the value-added assessment system.

Switch to New Tests

But instead of basing expected growth on norm-referenced tests, as was true in the past, the bill would base growth targets on Tennessee’s new criterion-referenced examinations, with the specific performance goals set by the commissioner of education and approved by the state board of education.

The law would also reduce the number of test items that must be new each year from 100 percent to 70 percent.

“It really ended up being a [Bredesen] administration bill,” said Bruce Opie, the legislative liaison for the state education department. “There was a bill that would have wiped out value-added altogether. We knew we needed to change some things, but not throw it out completely.”

“I think it gives the commissioner and the state board a little bit more flexibility in adjusting the system based on the performance on the criterion-referenced tests,” he added. Such tests assess students against specific academic standards, not against the performance of a sample of other students, as norm-referenced tests do.

William L. Sanders, the system’s creator, said last week that he was “extremely pleased” with the outcome.

“This has essentially reaffirmed that the state of Tennessee is committed to value-added assessment,” said Mr. Sanders, who now works for SAS inSchool, part of the Cary, N.C.-based SAS Institute Software Co.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the June 09, 2004 edition of Education Week as Tenn. ‘Value Added’ System Survives Legislative Attack

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by STARI
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
MTSS + AI in Action: Reimagining Student Support
See how one district is using AI to strengthen MTSS, reduce workload, and improve student support.
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Turning Spring Assessments Into Actionable Literacy Insights
Turn spring literacy scores into action! Learn how smarter data use, growth-focused grading, and instruction can drive real progress.
Assessment Letter to the Editor The Truth About Equity Grading in Practice
A high school student shares his perspective of equity grading policies in this letter.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Assessment Online Portals Offer Instant Access to Grades. That’s Not Always a Good Thing
For students and parents, is real-time access to grades an accountability booster or an anxiety provoker?
5 min read
Image of a woman interacting with a dashboard and seeing marks that are on target and off target. The mood is concern about the mark that is off target.
Visual Generation/Getty
Assessment Should Teachers Allow Students to Redo Classwork?
Allowing students to redo assignments is another aspect of the traditional grading debate.
2 min read
A teacher talks with seventh graders during a lesson.
A teacher talks with seventh graders during a lesson. The question of whether students should get a redo is part of a larger discussion on grading and assessment in education.
Allison Shelley for All4Ed