Assessment

Researchers Helping NAEP Board Find Value in Background Queries

October 02, 2002 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Researchers weighed in last week on ways to rethink the often-controversial background questions that accompany “the nation’s report card,” in an attempt to enhance the assessment’s research and policymaking value.

They did so at the request of the National Assessment of Educational Progress’ governing board, which has new authority to approve the background questions posed to students, teachers, and school administrators. Before the “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001, the board simply advised the Department of Education.

The National Assessment Governing Board, which is aiming to devise a framework for approaching the background questions by next May, asked researchers to submit papers on a number of related topics.

Some questions, those dealing with race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, have long been the backbone of NAEP. Such information helps education officials monitor achievement for different student populations over time.

But the questions also delve into other matters, such as students’ behavior, school experiences, and home environments, as well as teachers’ backgrounds and instructional practices. Some policymakers and parents contend that those kinds of questions are an invasion of privacy.

Narrowing the Focus

John H. Stevens, a governing-board member appointed by President Bush, pointed out that the background questions have been around since the inception of the 33-year-old testing program, which periodically samples students in a variety of subjects. Mr. Stevens, the executive director of the Texas Business and Education Coalition and the board member who is spearheading the background-question effort, said last week’s meeting represented just the beginning of the process.

The No Child Left Behind Act ratchets up the importance of NAEP. All states will now be required to administer the tests. In addition, NAEP exams will be given at least every other year in reading and mathematics for 4th and 8th graders and be used as an independent benchmark for gauging states’ progress on their own tests.

“NAEP has only realized 10 or 15 percent of its capability,” David W. Grissmer, an education researcher at the Santa Monica, Calif.-based RAND Corp., told governing-board members at their Sept. 24 workshop.

He suggested that improvements to the background questions, coupled with other changes in data collection and sampling procedures, would substantially improve NAEP’s value. Mr. Grissmer estimated that the governing board could eliminate two-thirds of the current background questions without harming research, if the remaining questions were more carefully crafted and clearly focused.

Mr. Grissmer also recommended creating a “simple” parent survey to improve the research value.

Moreover, he argued that some current background questions “encourage misuse.” He cited a question about students’ television-viewing habits that he characterized as being driven by overly simple research hypotheses.

Ina V.S. Mullis, a researcher at Boston College, made the point, echoed by others, that the board should devise a focused set of questions because students and teachers have limited time and patience.

“Think of a primary purpose for these background questions,” she said. “Pick something manageable ... something that at least might be feasible.”

Paul E. Barton, an independent testing expert, called the background questions an “under-attended aspect of NAEP” in his paper.

Mr. Barton said a dramatic expansion in background questions started in 1984, largely to reflect a desire to explain levels of achievement.

Herbert J. Walberg, a professor emeritus at the University of Illinois at Chicago and a visiting fellow at Stanford University, offered a laundry list of potential indicators the questions might address: school choice, class size, and retention of failing students in their current grades, among them.

The national assessment, he acknowledged, could not reasonably examine all the areas, though items could be “rotated” among students to minimize the burden.

No More ‘Ornaments’

One researcher, however, was skeptical of NAEP’s value in shedding light on how schools and teachers affect student achievement.

Michael Podgursky, an economics professor at the University of Missouri, said some responses from students, and even teachers, might not be very reliable. Moreover, no prior data are available on the students tested, he pointed out.

State tests hold far greater promise for answering questions on what factors affect student achievement, Mr. Podgursky argued, because states have increasingly rich data on students, teachers, and classroom practices. Given the limited resources for NAEP, he said, money should not go toward getting at such issues in NAEP.

“I’d love to see a bigger sample size,” he said, rather than “adding more ornaments.”

Under the No Child Left Behind Act, a revision of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, NAEP must not “evaluate or assess personal or family beliefs and attitudes.” Congress said that provision does not prohibit the use of “nonintrusive” background questions if they have a demonstrated relationship to academic achievement. In addition, all questions must be “secular, neutral, and nonideological,” a provision of the 1994 edition of the ESEA as well.

“People don’t want the national assessment to intrude,” Mr. Stevens of the governing board said.

The board earlier this year approved definitions of secular, neutral, and nonideological and removed a background item related—though vaguely—to religion when it approved the reading and math tests for 2003.

In a set of questions about the amount of time students spend outside of school reading nonfiction, the board this summer axed an item that said “books about religion or philosophy.”

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
When SEL Curriculum Is Not Enough: Integrating Social-Emotional Behavior Supports in MTSS
Help ensure the success of your SEL program with guidance for building capacity to support implementation at every tier of your MTSS.
Content provided by Illuminate Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Profession Webinar
Professional Wellness Strategies to Enhance Student Learning and Live Your Best Life
Reduce educator burnout with research-affirmed daily routines and strategies that enhance achievement of educators and students alike. 
Content provided by Solution Tree
English-Language Learners Webinar The Science of Reading and Multilingual Learners: What Educators Need to Know
Join experts in reading science and multilingual literacy to discuss what the latest research means for multilingual learners in classrooms adopting a science of reading-based approach.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Letter to the Editor 2022 Assessment ‘Most Important’ Ever
The executive director of the National Assessment Governing Board responds to criticism of NAEP in this letter to the editor.
1 min read
Illustration of an open laptop receiving an email.
iStock/Getty
Assessment Opinion Ignore NAEP. Better Yet, Abolish It
We’ve got to stop testing schools to death, writes Al Kingsley. National (and international) tests won't “fix” education.
Al Kingsley
5 min read
conceptual illustration of a ruler measuring a figure
Vanessa Solis/Education Week and iStock/Getty images
Assessment Opinion The Future, Present, and Past of 'the Nation's Report Card'
What lies ahead for the nation's only true barometer of the state of K-12 education?
7 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Assessment The 'Nation's Report Card' Is Getting an Overhaul: 5 Things to Know
The leaders of NAEP have big plans for making the test more nimble, flexible, and useful.
9 min read
Image of a bank of computers in a library.
baona/E+