Assessment Letter to the Editor

Computer-Adaptive Assessment Can Serve Differing Purposes

August 05, 2013 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

I read with interest the article “Adaptive Testing Gains Momentum, Prompts Worries” (July 10, 2013). All who publish computer-adaptive assessments should applaud legislative efforts to include computer-adaptive testing, or CAT, in federal assessment programs. However, I wish to address the concerns cited in the article about whether test items in such assessments should be constrained by grade level.

The article failed to highlight an essential point: Not all CATs are designed for the same educational purposes. A focus on grade level may be appropriate for federally mandated accountability testing—the summative tests discussed in the article. When the purpose is to discover the level at which a student is performing (potentially above or below grade), however, and whether that student is growing academically, the test design will need to be substantially different.

To provide instructionally useful information to students, teachers, and administrators, all students’ achievement levels must be measured with equivalent precision, wherever they reside on the achievement continuum. Information from assessments designed to inform learning can be directly translated into differentiated instruction that gives each child the opportunity to succeed.

Based on the vision sketched in the article, one could ask whether instruction should be merely standards-based rather than student-centric, and whether the only metric that matters is if students are proficient at grade level, not that they are actually growing.

With classroom time at a premium, schools need an assessment program that balances teachers’ needs for actionable information with federal accountability requirements. Computer-adaptive testing can play a pivotal role in this, and all students and teachers in the country stand to benefit.

Raymond Yeagley

Vice President

Chief Academic Officer

Northwest Evaluation Association

Portland, Ore.

A version of this article appeared in the August 07, 2013 edition of Education Week as Computer-Adaptive Assessment Can Serve Differing Purposes


Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum Making Technology Work Better in Schools
Join experts for a look at the steps schools are taking (or should take) to improve the use of technology in schools.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Budget & Finance Webinar
The ABCs of ESSER: How to Make the Most of Relief Funds Before They Expire
Join a diverse group of K-12 experts to learn how to leverage federal funds before they expire and improve student learning environments.
Content provided by Johnson Controls
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Modernizing Principal Support: The Road to More Connected and Effective Leaders
When principals are better equipped to lead, support, and maintain high levels of teaching and learning, outcomes for students are improved.
Content provided by BetterLesson

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Opinion What the Digital SAT Will Mean for Students and Educators
The college-admissions test will be fully digital by 2024. Priscilla Rodriguez from the College Board discusses the change.
6 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Assessment Opinion Searching for Common Ground: What Makes a Good Test?
Rick Hess and USC Dean Pedro Noguera discuss standardized testing—what it’s for, where it’s gone wrong, and how to improve it.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Assessment in 2022
This Spotlight will help you understand how to use assessment data to guide student learning and examine the debate over standardized tests.
Assessment State Test Results Are In. Are They Useless?
While states, districts, and schools pore over data from spring 2021 tests, experts urge caution over how to interpret and use the results.
9 min read
FILE - In this Jan. 17, 2016 file photo, a sign is seen at the entrance to a hall for a college test preparation class in Bethesda, Md. The $380 million test coaching industry is facing competition from free or low-cost alternatives in what their founders hope will make the process of applying to college more equitable. Such innovations are also raising questions about the relevance and the fairness of relying on standardized tests in admissions process.
A sign is posted at the entrance to a hall for a test-preparation class. Assessment experts say educators should use data from spring 2021 tests with caution.
Alex Brandon/AP