Assessment

Ohio Lawmakers Differ On Funding Mechanism

By Jessica L. Sandham — April 18, 2001 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Ohio Gov. Bob Taft and state legislative leaders say they agree that a plan to give schools an additional $1.4 billion over two years is what’s needed to mend a flawed education finance system—but they haven’t agreed on how to pay for it.

After meeting for seven hours April 11, the governor, Speaker of the House Larry Householder, and Senate President Richard H. Finan indicated that they had made progress on a proposal. The plan would provide a 12 percent increase in guaranteed per-pupil spending, from $4,294 this year to $4,814 in fiscal 2002. An additional $300 million would be allocated over two years to reduce spending disparities between low-income districts and their wealthier counterparts. But final legislative language still eluded the three Republican leaders.

In contrast, a proposal to revise the state’s standards and accountability system was proving less contentious. The Ohio Senate late last month approved a bill that would clarify the state’s academic standards. Moreover, it would replace the existing state proficiency tests with a series of subject-related achievement tests, culminating with a 10th grade exam students would have to pass to graduate. The measure is currently being considered by the House education committee.

Back to Court?

On the funding front, lawmakers are working to satisfy the state supreme court, which ruled last May that the state’s initial efforts to change the school financing system—first ruled unconstitutional in 1997—failed to pass muster. A new plan must be signed into law by June 15 to meet the court-imposed deadline. (“Ohio High Court Again Overturns Finance System,” May 17, 2000.)

But faced with the prospect of sharply declining tax revenues because of a slowing state economy, state leaders said last week that they were still looking for ways to pay for the increase in school aid and balance the budget. The lawmakers said they were also considering postponing the implementation of tax credits scheduled to go into effect this year, and tapping some of the state’s $1 billion rainy-day fund. “The goal is to get something worked out as soon as possible,” said Jennifer Detwiler, a spokeswoman for Mr. Householder. “It’s essentially how they’re going to fund it that’s an issue at this point.”

William L. Phillis, the executive director of the Ohio Coalition for Equity and Adequacy in School Funding—which filed the original lawsuit, known as DeRolph v. State of Ohio, in 1991—contended that while the $1.4 billion plan would provide new money for schools, it would not meet the supreme court’s requirement for a “thorough and efficient” school finance system. The proposal would not actively reduce districts’ reliance on property taxes for funds, he maintained, and would not provide enough money for already “severely underfunded” special education programs.

In addition, Mr. Phillis charged that lawmakers had manipulated the data on per-pupil spending levels until they came out with a number that suited them, rather than first determining the cost of an adequate education. The formula is tied to the average per-pupil spending levels in high- achieving districts.

“Needless to say, we’ll be back in court,” Mr. Phillis said. “It’s going to be easy to show that this system is still grossly unconstitutional.”

The coalition had supported an earlier plan floated by Mr. Householder that would have increased spending on schools by a whopping $3.2 billion over the next two years, and would likely have agreed to settle the case had that plan gone forward. But the sources identified to pay for the plan— including the addition of slot machines at racetracks and budget cuts—were rejected by other Republicans.

Testing Changes

Meanwhile, under a plan approved 29-3 by the Senate last month, the state would abandon its controversial 4th grade reading-guarantee program, scheduled for implementation next spring. The so-called guarantee says students must meet proficiency requirements on state reading tests to advance to the 5th grade.

The legislation would instead mandate that students who fail the test receive intervention services. In addition, students would be tested on different subjects every year in grades 3-5 and 7-8, while 10th graders would take a graduation test. For example, the state would administer reading tests to 3rd grade students, mathematics and writing tests to 4th graders, and science and citizenship tests to 5th grade students, rather than continuing the current practice of 4th graders sitting for a weeklong spate of tests in multiple subject areas. Diagnostic tests in different subjects would be used in the off- years to fill in the data gaps.

“This spreads out the tests so that teachers can concentrate on different knowledge bases,” said Sen. Robert A. Gardner, the Republican who sponsored the measure. “It eases up the burden on teachers and kids a little bit and lets them focus.”

Still, not everyone approves of the Senate plan. Despite his successful sponsorship of an amendment that would allow some students to graduate even if they failed the 10th grade proficiency tests in one of the five requisite subject areas, Sen. Michael C. Shoemaker voted against the Senate plan.

The influx of state assessments has forced teachers to abandon successful classroom curricula in favor of instruction geared to the tests themselves, the Democratic lawmaker argued.

“Mine was sort of a protest vote,” Mr. Shoemaker said. “I didn’t want anyone to think this was unanimous.”

A version of this article appeared in the April 18, 2001 edition of Education Week as Ohio Lawmakers Differ On Funding Mechanism

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Classroom Technology Webinar
Academic Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
As AI writing tools rapidly evolve, learn how to set standards and expectations for your students on their use.
Content provided by Turnitin
Recruitment & Retention Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Chronic Teacher Shortage: Where Do We Go From Here?  
Join Peter DeWitt, Michael Fullan, and guests for expert insights into finding solutions for the teacher shortage.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
The Science of Reading: Tools to Build Reading Proficiency
The Science of Reading has taken education by storm. Learn how Dr. Miranda Blount transformed literacy instruction in her state.
Content provided by hand2mind

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment A Huge Publisher and a Big Testing Company Are Teaming Up. What This Means for Educators
Four key questions to consider about how the pairing of Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and NWEA might affect educators.
3 min read
Students testing.
Getty
Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Assessment
This Spotlight will help you examine updated testing guidance from the U.S. Dept. of Ed, analyze college-placement test scores, and more.

Assessment Opinion We Are More Than Our Grades: A Student's Perspective
Students have come to believe that their GPA and test scores are the ultimate reflection of their self-worth, writes a college senior.
Bailey Striepling
3 min read
Conceptual illustration of Students emerging from a field of giant discarded letter grades.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week and iStock/Getty Images
Assessment Letter to the Editor Grading for Growth Through Competency-Based Education
Competency-based education can better prepare today's children for tomorrow's challenges, writes this letter to the editor.
1 min read
Illustration of an open laptop receiving an email.
iStock/Getty