Early Childhood

N.C. Supreme Court to Decide on Pre-K Funding

By Christina A. Samuels — October 29, 2013 6 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The North Carolina Supreme Court is weighing arguments in a case that will help decide if the state must pay for preschool to bridge achievement gaps—an obligation that some estimates suggest would require making room for more than 60,000 children at a cost of $300 million annually.

The case, heard before the court earlier this month, is part of a growing trend of school finance and equity cases around the country that have focused on early childhood education for students at risk of school failure.

Every state’s constitution has language about the right to a public education, said Molly Hunter, the executive director of the Newark, N.J.-based organization Education Justice, which advocates on behalf of school equity.

The argument that preschool is a part of a child’s educational rights has met with mixed results, she said. One well-known equity case in New Jersey, Abbott v. Burke, established preschools in 31 low-income districts. And in North Carolina, the high court has said in an earlier decision that preschoolers have the same educational rights as those enrolled in public school.

Legal Battles

The case heard before the North Carolina Supreme Court on preschool eligibility is just the latest legal move in a long-running series of educational equity cases.

May 1994
Five rural low-income school districts, Cumberland, Halifax, Hoke, Robeson, and Vance counties, sue the state, saying they believed their systems were not receiving the same educational opportunities as wealthier districts. Some wealthier urban districts eventually joined the case, formerly known as Leandro v. State of North Carolina, saying they were not provided enough state funding to meet the needs of their English-learners, special education students, and gifted students.

July 1997
The state Supreme Court reverses an appeals court decision that goes against the districts, instead ruling that every child in the state is guaranteed the right to a “sound basic” education. The case is sent back for trial before Superior Court Judge Howard Manning, who issues a series of rulings that outline how the state must meet its constitutional obligation.

Feb. 2001
Former Gov. Mike Easley, a Democrat, introduces More at Four, a program for preschoolers from low-income families. The program is intended to serve as one remedy to address the requirement that all students receive a “sound basic education.”

July 2004
After further litigation, the state Supreme Court makes a ruling in Hoke County Board of Education v. State of North Carolina that the right to a sound basic education extends to preschoolers. Gov. Easley and other lawmakers say that the early-childhood program is their way of addressing education inequities for preschool-aged children.

June 2011
The North Carolina General Assembly passes a budget that renames More at Four to the North Carolina Pre-Kindergarten Program, reduces funding to the program, tightens eligibility, and institutes an income-based sliding scale for monthly tuition.

July 2011
After the budget passes, Judge Manning rules that the state is violating its constitution and cannot enact “artificial barriers” to preschool enrollment.

October 2013
After the judge’s ruling is upheld on appeal, the issue of whether the state is obligated to provide preschool to at-risk children is argued before the state Supreme Court.

Source: Education Week

However, the North Carolina court has, so far, stopped short of mandating preschool. So have courts in other states, saying that’s a remedy that should be left up to the legislative branch to enact.

The current case, the latest in a series of legal actions spanning 19 years, will require the court to re-examine its deference to the legislative branch.

In 1994, five rural districts and parents sued North Carolina, saying that their counties did not have the tax revenue for the same type of education that wealthier districts provide. The case was known as Leandro v. State of North Carolina, after the family that was the first named plaintiff in the legal action.

Governor Takes Action

In 1997, the high court ruled that all children were entitled to a “sound basic education,” and that it was the state’s responsibility to provide that education.

Further litigation led to Hoke County Board of Education v. State of North Carolina, informally known as Leandro II. In that 2004 decision, the state’s high court reaffirmed its earlier ruling, saying that the right to a sound basic education applied not only to children in K-12 public schools, but also to younger children.

While the cases continued, then-Gov. Michael F. Easley, a Democrat, pushed through legislation for a state-funded preschool program called More At Four.

In a recent interview with Education Week, he said the program was specifically developed as one remedy for achievement gaps between students from low-income families and their better-off peers. The program is currently open to children from families of four making under $51,000 a year, which is about 75 percent of the state’s median income.

Program Found Effective

“My long-term program was to get kids ready, so that those children who are behind speed up so they can reach their full potential,” Mr. Easley said. “And the children who are ready don’t get slowed down.”

More at Four was launched in 2001, and the program eventually peaked at about 35,000 4-year-olds in 2010-11, at a cost of approximately $170 million a year. It also became one of the best-regarded state-funded preschool programs in the country in the evaluation of the National Institute of Early Education Research, based at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J.

Both the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and researchers at Duke University in Durham, N.C. studied the program and found positive effects of the program lasting until third grade.

“I don’t think there’s anything else that Duke and UNC agree on,” said W. Steven Barnett, the director of NIEER.

But the program was always on tenuous financial footing, Mr. Easley said. State lawmakers offered various arguments against it, including that it is a large government entitlement program, or that the income eligibility is too broad.

In 2011, in the wake of a large budget deficit and a change in the state legislature to a Republican majority, the legislature cut funding for the program and attempted to tighten eligibility requirements and set up an income-based sliding scale for tuition payment. The legislature also moved the program from the state education department to the early-childhood division of the state’s department of health and human services.

Those changes immediately sparked a legal challenge, which led to the case now before the state supreme court—also titled Hoke County Board of Education v. State of North Carolina.

The trial judge who had overseen other Leandro-related litigation, Judge Howard E. Manning Jr., wrote in July 2011 that although the state supreme court did not require any particular solution, including preschool, to address educational inequities, the preschool program was the only remedy the state had ever offered for its obligation to provide a sound basic education to young children. Thus, the state had to continue to make the program available to all the state’s 4-year-olds deemed at risk of school failure, Judge Manning ruled.

Lawmakers eventually withdrew their restrictions on eligibility for the preschool program, though the funding reduction has cut slots to about 26,000. Universal prekindergarten for at-risk children is an aspiration of the state’s, but not a legally mandated requirement, the state has argued in its appeal of Judge Manning’s ruling.

The Abbott v. Burke in New Jersey is one of the first cases to link educational equity to early-childhood education. First filed in 1981 as a lawsuit by students in low-income districts, it eventually led to a succession of decisions relating to school equity.

Preschool Needed

But preschool is not always supported as an equity issue. In 2008, the Wyoming Supreme Court closed a case that started as a 1995 equity case, Campbell County School District v. State of Wyoming. The state’s high court said it could not order preschool because Wyoming’s constitution obligates the state to provide education starting at age 6.

And in May, the Colorado Supreme Court handed a defeat to plaintiffs who were arguing that the state’s formula for funding schools was inequitable and offered preschool as one remedy.

But even in defeat, Colorado early-education advocates have been about to find traction. A week before the court released its decision, Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, signed a bill that would pay for preschool for children deemed at risk of academic failure, fund full-day kindergarten, and revamp the state’s school finance formula. Voters there still have decide if they want to enact a tax increase to finance the nearly $1 billion program.

While the North Carolina justices mull the Hoke County case, the action has made partners out of former opponents. James G. Exum Jr., a former chief justice of the state supreme court, is representing the North Carolina board of education in the case. The board fought the original Leandro lawsuit, but is in favor of expanded preschool in this case.

“There’s no doubt in our mind we have committed ourselves to this particular remedy,” Mr. Exum said in an interview. “Until you come up with something else, you cannot deny this remedy to people who are eligible to have it.”

A version of this article appeared in the October 30, 2013 edition of Education Week as State Pre-K Obligation At Center of Dispute Before N.C. High Court


Special Education Webinar Reading, Dyslexia, and Equity: Best Practices for Addressing a Threefold Challenge
Learn about proven strategies for instruction and intervention that support students with dyslexia.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Personalized Learning Webinar
No Time to Waste: Individualized Instruction Will Drive Change
Targeted support and intervention can boost student achievement. Join us to explore tutoring’s role in accelerating the turnaround. 
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools
Student Well-Being K-12 Essentials Forum Social-Emotional Learning: Making It Meaningful
Join us for this event with educators and experts on the damage the pandemic did to academic and social and emotional well-being.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Early Childhood As Head Start Quality Push Continues, Advocates Raise Red Flag on Equity
Inadequate federal funding forces Head Start providers to choose between quality and quantity, a new report contends.
2 min read
A multi-ethnic group of preschool students is sitting with their legs crossed on the floor in their classroom. The mixed-race female teacher is sitting on the floor facing the children. The happy kids are smiling and following the teacher's instructions. They have their arms raised in the air.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Early Childhood Whitepaper
The Link Between Early Literacy and Numeracy Skill Development
While early literacy and numeracy skills are normally thought of as separate areas of instruction for educators, research suggests there ...
Content provided by Voyager Sopris Learning
Early Childhood Spotlight Spotlight on Early Learning
This Spotlight will help you examine the impact of early education programs on high school performance, evaluate pre-K programs, and more.
Early Childhood Get a Very Early Start on Teaching Coding Skills. Pilot Study Suggests Trying Robotic Toys
The study found that coding exercises enhanced the preschoolers’ problem-solving skills, creativity, and determination.
2 min read
Julian Gresham, 12, left, works in a group to program a Bee-Bot while in their fifth grade summer school class Monday, June 14, 2021, at Goliad Elementary School. Bee-bots and are new to Ector County Independent School District and help to teach students basic programming skills like sequencing, estimation and problem-solving.
Students work in a group to program a Bee-Bot while in their summer school class at Goliad Elementary School in Odessa, Texas.
Jacob Ford/Odessa American via AP