A Better Measure of Student Growth?

By Lynn Olson — November 06, 2006 1 min read

While interest in judging school performance based on the gains individual students make over time is high, the best way to do so is not even part of the current debate, one veteran testing expert argues.

The best approach, according to education consultant Paul E. Barton, is simple: Give two forms of the same test, one at the beginning of the school year and one at the end.

“‘Failing or ‘Succeeding’ Schools: How Can We Tell?” is posted by the American Federation of Teachers.

“The use of before and after tests to measure improvement has been perfected for over 50 years,” unlike other methods, he writes in a paper prepared for the American Federation of Teachers.

Such tests, he contends, have several distinct advantages: They give teachers information on each student at the beginning of the school year; they use known technologies; they can be clearly aligned with the content standards and curriculum for the year of instruction; and the results are readily understood.

In addition, Mr. Barton notes, models that compare progress from the end of one year to the next do not take into account large differences in children’s summer experiences.

One study found that the different amounts of progress that students make during the four summers between the 2nd and 6th grades accounts for more than 80 percent of the achievement gap between economically disadvantaged and advantaged students.

Once before and after tests were in place, Mr. Barton says, policymakers still would need to decide how much growth is enough.

But that could be done, for example, by looking at how much gain is typical, how much gain occurs in the classes of particularly effective teachers, and how wide the distribution of average-gain scores is among schools.

When a standard has been set for how much students should learn during a school year, it should be applied across the board and be broken down by subgroup, adds Mr. Barton, a former director of the policy-information center at the Princeton, N.J.-based Educational Testing Service.

A version of this article appeared in the November 08, 2006 edition of Education Week


Jobs The EdWeek Top School Jobs Virtual Career Fair
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
A Safe Return to Schools is Possible with Testing
We are edging closer to a nationwide return to in-person learning in the fall. However, vaccinations alone will not get us through this. Young children not being able to vaccinate, the spread of new and
Content provided by BD
Equity & Diversity Live Online Discussion What Is Critical Race Theory and Why You Shouldn't Shy Away From It
In this episode of A Seat at the Table, Peter DeWitt sits down with lawyer-educator Janel George and EdWeek reporters, Stephen Sawchuk and Andrew Ujifusa, as they discuss what’s at the heart of the critical

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Opinion Grading Has Always Been an Imperfect Exercise. COVID-19 Made It Worse
It’s hard reducing the complexity of each student’s social, emotional, and academic learning to a letter grade. Maybe we’re doing it wrong.
Lory Walker Peroff
4 min read
A student's grades are unknown
Robert Neubecker for Education Week
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Assessment Whitepaper
Facing the Future Together: Digital Innovative Solutions
Join us to discuss how digital innovative solutions can enrich the educational experience in the K-12 environment. We’ll share how these ...
Content provided by Pearson
Assessment Opinion What Federally Mandated State Tests Are Good For (And What They Aren’t)
Spring 2021 testing is happening. That can be a good thing—if the goal is about more than school accountability.
Stuart Kahl
5 min read
Two people analyze test data
Visual Generation/iStock/Getty
Assessment Opinion The National Assessment Governing Board’s Troubling Gag Order
NAGB's recently released restrictions on how its board members can communicate set a troubling precedent.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty