Education Funding

When There’s More Money for Schools, Is There an ‘Objective’ Way to Hand It Out?

By Mark Lieberman — April 17, 2024 7 min read
Illustration of many roads and road signs going in different directions with falling money all around.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Tyler Hansford served as superintendent of the Union school district in Mississippi from 2018 to 2022. Year after year, the 1,000-student district received half a million dollars less from the state than it needed to cover all of its expenses, which total roughly $6 million. Property tax collections from the rural district couldn’t make up the difference.

As a result, he often had to make hard choices.

“You’ve got to make sure you’ve got teachers in front of the students,” said Hansford, who now serves as superintendent of the adjacent Newton County district. “Sometimes that means the roof probably doesn’t get replaced when it should, or maybe the windows are a little older than they should be.”

See Also

Conceptual illustration of tiny people is planning the personal budget, accounting, analysis.
Muhamad Chabibalwi/iStock/Getty
Education Funding How States Are Rethinking Where School Funding Should Go
Mark Lieberman, February 23, 2024
7 min read

Both of Hansford’s rural districts have been among the victims of the state’s funding formula, which has been in place since 1997. On average, the formula sends roughly equivalent per-pupil amounts to high- and low-poverty districts, despite the consensus among researchers that high-poverty school districts benefit from having substantially more resources than their low-poverty counterparts.

The formula targets aid to districts based on calculations of staffing needs that rely on spending data from previous years in average schools.

Critics argue it gives wealthy districts an unfair advantage and doesn’t provide enough financial relief to the districts and students that need it most. State lawmakers have also rarely allocated as much money as the formula dictates.

Now Mississippi lawmakers are scrambling to replace the formula with something more equitable and less complicated. Similar efforts to fix school funding inequities are underway in Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, and Virginia.

Dueling versions of a funding formula revamp

Even by the standards of typical fights over fixing school funding at the state level, the situation in Mississippi is messy and tense.

Each house of the Mississippi legislature has put forward a plan to revamp the state’s school funding formula, which has been in place since 1997 and has long drawn criticism from politicians and school district leaders. Republicans have comfortable control of both legislative chambers.

The Senate’s proposal makes modest changes to the current approach but keeps its underlying structure.

The House, meanwhile, has crafted a substantially different model, centered around weighted funding for high-need students rather than allocating resources based on staffing levels.

Gov. Tate Reeves, a Republican, has said he supports the House plan. But on April 9, a Senate committee voted down the House plan. In response, House Speaker Jason White has signaled that he may refuse to proceed with the state’s annual allocation of K-12 school funding if the Senate doesn’t agree to the new formula in the coming days.

Fair's a hard word. What’s fair to you and fair to me and fair to the next person can get twisted.

Lawmakers and advocates in the state broadly agree that schools need more resources. But figuring out how to allocate them, Hansford said, has been a particular challenge ever since Mississippi voters rejected a 2015 ballot measure that would have pushed the state to dramatically increase school funding.

“I think the formula that they’ve been working on is trying to take into account what local places can contribute and what’s fair. But fair’s a hard word,” Hansford said. “What’s fair to you and fair to me and fair to the next person can get twisted.”

Mississippi isn’t alone in the quest for a more equitable school funding approach

The standoff highlights several trends that are playing out in Mississippi as well as across the country.

Two competing approaches to funding schools are squaring off in the political arena. But unlike with some neatly partisan issues, neither proposal has won over all the lawmakers from either party.

Meanwhile, regular state aid that schools are anticipating for next school year, much less an increase, could be in jeopardy if lawmakers don’t resolve their differences soon. This prospect echoes the recent legislative fight over private school choice in Texas, which culminated in lawmakers adjourning a special session last year without providing any new funding for the state’s public schools—and without passing a school choice bill.

The possibility of a funding shortfall comes as schools are also bracing for the expiration of federal COVID relief funds, which have provided a financial cushion in recent years following pandemic-related turbulence.

Plus, the state has garnered national praise for crafting a set of reading programs in schools, coupled with targeted funding, that have significantly raised student achievement.

Those efforts are “going to do nothing if the dollars don’t align behind the kids who need it,” said Rebecca Sibilia, executive director of EdFund, a new nonprofit organization that focuses on school finance research.

See Also

Illustration of Man helping a young guy up stairs into an open book as a metaphor for targeted literacy training.
Rudzhan Nagiev/iStock/Getty Images

Policymakers want ‘objective’ criteria to guide school funding

Sibilia previously served as founder and CEO of EdBuild, a now-defunct school funding nonprofit that was heavily involved in a previous effort to revise Mississippi’s school funding formula.

This latest push for a new formula is building on the plan Sibilia’s team helped craft, and on one that was implemented a few years ago in Tennessee.

Mississippi law currently says state and federal sources must cover no less than 73 percent of a district’s annual operating budget.

However, districts with greater property wealth can raise substantially more than the remaining 27 percent by taxing their residents, while districts like Newton struggle to even meet their 27 percent obligation.

When the Newton County schools raise one mill’s worth of property taxes, the system receives roughly $62,000, Hansford said. In some of the state’s urban districts, meanwhile, 1 mill is worth nearly a million dollars, as they can draw from so much more property wealth. (Each mill is $1 in property tax levied per $1,000 of assessed value.)

The Senate proposal would increase the maximum local contribution to 29.5 percent and make adjustments for inflation. But otherwise, the 1997 law would remain intact.

The House proposal, meanwhile, would retain the 27 percent rule. But it would add weights for students in high-need categories like low-income students and English learners, sending more state funding to districts with larger high-need populations. It would also determine funding amounts based on enrollment rather than attendance, ensuring that schools aren’t fiscally penalized when students miss school.

Those changes would result in a $250 million overall increase in funding for the state’s K-12 schools in the law’s first year of implementation. The Senate’s version would result in a $200 million increase.

The House’s INSPIRE Act would also require the state to incorporate feedback every two years from school superintendents in each of the state’s congressional districts.

The current system, by contrast, derives its base aid calculation from the average per-pupil amount a district with a “C” grade from the state spent during the previous year.

Critics of the proposed new formula, have zeroed in on the role superintendents will play, raising concerns that letting individual school leaders weigh in could crowd out more “objective” criteria to guide funding allocations.

“I think an objective funding formula is reliable. That is why I am pursuing it,” Sen. Dennis DeBar, chair of the Senate’s education committee, told Mississippi Today in February.

Sibilia thinks those concerns are overblown, given lawmakers’ history of subjective decisions about how much money to put into the current formula.

“I don’t think that anyone aspires to be a C-rated school district,” Sibilia said. “That alone is, maybe it’s objective, but it’s objective based on mediocrity.”

Objective measures of student need and educational costs are hard to come by.

Nevada, for instance, has recently tried using a machine-learning tool to refine its definition of “at-risk students,” but some district leaders believe the new system is undercounting the number of students who benefit from additional funding.

See Also

Illustration of robotic hand putting coins into jar.
iStock / Getty Images Plus

Other states devote extra dollars to students eligible for free and reduced-price meals, even though some low-income students haven’t filled out paperwork to demonstrate eligibility and lunch eligibility has become a less reliable barometer of poverty over time as universally free meals become more common.

These issues perennially cause headaches for lawmakers, who often aren’t well-versed in the particulars of education funding formulas or school budgets.

“I truly have not seen a showdown like this when it comes to school funding,” said Sibilia, whose previous organization maintained a comprehensive database of states’ wildly varied approaches to school finance. “Both sides believe the stakes are very high.”

A version of this article appeared in the May 08, 2024 edition of Education Week as When There’s More Money for Schools, Is There an ‘Objective’ Way to Hand It Out?


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning
Budget & Finance Webinar Staffing Schools After ESSER: What School and District Leaders Need to Know
Join our newsroom for insights on investing in critical student support positions as pandemic funds expire.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Achievement Webinar
How can districts build sustainable tutoring models before the money runs out?
District leaders, low on funds, must decide: broad support for all or deep interventions for few? Let's discuss maximizing tutoring resources.
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Explainer How Can Districts Get More Time to Spend ESSER Dollars? An Explainer
Districts can get up to 14 additional months to spend ESSER dollars on contracts—if their state and the federal government both approve.
4 min read
Illustration of woman turning back hands on clock.
Education Week + iStock / Getty Images Plus Week
Education Funding Education Dept. Sees Small Cut in Funding Package That Averted Government Shutdown
The Education Department will see a reduction even as the funding package provides for small increases to key K-12 programs.
3 min read
President Joe Biden delivers a speech about healthcare at an event in Raleigh, N.C., on March 26, 2024.
President Joe Biden delivers a speech about health care at an event in Raleigh, N.C., on March 26. Biden signed a funding package into law over the weekend that keeps the federal government open through September but includes a slight decrease in the Education Department's budget.
Matt Kelley/AP
Education Funding Biden's Budget Proposes Smaller Bump to Education Spending
The president requested increases to Title I and IDEA, and funding to expand preschool access in his 2025 budget proposal.
7 min read
President Joe Biden delivers remarks on lowering prices for American families during an event at the YMCA Allard Center on March 11, 2024, in Goffstown, N.H.
President Joe Biden delivers remarks on lowering prices for American families during an event at the YMCA Allard Center on March 11, 2024, in Goffstown, N.H. Biden's administration released its 2025 budget proposal, which includes a modest spending increase for the Education Department.
Evan Vucci/AP
Education Funding States Are Pulling Back on K-12 Spending. How Hard Will Schools Get Hit?
Some states are trimming education investments as financial forecasts suggest boom times may be over.
6 min read
Collage illustration of California state house and U.S. currency background.
F. Sheehan for Education Week / Getty