Federal

What the Federal ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill Actually Says

By Eesha Pendharkar — November 09, 2022 4 min read
Demonstrators gather on the steps of the Florida Historic Capitol Museum in front of the Florida State Capitol on March 7, 2022, in Tallahassee, Fla. Florida House Republicans advanced a bill, dubbed by opponents as the "Don't Say Gay" bill, to forbid discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools, rejecting criticism from Democrats who said the proposal demonizes LGBTQ people.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A federal version of Florida’s controversial “Don’t Say Gay” bill introduced last month would ban the use of federal resources to teach students about sexual activity and sexual orientation, gender identity, and dysphoria or transgenderism.

It’s highly unlikely that the bill, formally titled the “Stop the Sexualization of Children Act,” will be passed into law while Democrats control the House and Senate. But the Nov. 8 election results could offer Rep. Mike Johnson, the Louisiana Republican who proposed the bill, and his 33 co-signers, all Republicans, a chance at getting it passed.

“The Democratic Party and their cultural allies are on a misguided crusade to immerse young children in sexual imagery and radical gender ideology,” Johnson says in a statement. “This common-sense bill is straightforward. No federal tax dollars should go to any federal, state, or local government agencies, or private organizations that intentionally expose children under 10 years of age to sexually explicit material.”

But while Johnson called the bill “common-sense,” legal and LGBTQ advocacy experts say it’s concerning and a transparent political attempt at erasing LGBTQ identities.

“It’s quite important and deeply troubling that we saw these bills introduced,” said Jennifer Pizer, the chief legal officer at Lambda Legal, a civil rights organization focusing on defending the rights of LGBTQ people, “because it suggests that this issue is going to be the next anti-LGBTQ, right-wing bandwagon.”

The federal version follows a spate of anti-LGBTQ state legislation

This year, dozens of bills were introduced across the country that target LGBTQ students by restricting access to books about LGBTQ topics or lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity. Transgender students in particular have also been targeted in state legislation that attempts to restrict their use of restrooms aligned with their gender identity and limit theiraccess to team athletics, especially for trans girls.

Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law, officially known as the Parental Rights in Education law, is the most widely known example of that legislative genre and has inspired copycat bills across the country. Contrary to its nickname, though, that law did not specifically ban lessons on gender identity, sexual orientation, and transgender issues. Its critics dubbed it “Don’t Say Gay” because of its anti-LGBTQ intent, which was made evident by statements state lawmakers made when they were introducing the bill. For example, Gov. Ron DeSantis’ spokesperson, Christina Pushaw, called opponents of the bill “groomers” on Twitter, an accusation often aimed baselessly at LGBTQ rights advocates.

“Whether it’s this new bill introduced in Congress or the hundreds of bills that have been introduced in state legislatures around the country, it’s all the same,” said Aaron Ridings, chief of staff and deputy executive director for public policy and research at GLSEN, an LGBTQ advocacy organization.

“It’s about discrimination and exclusion, and that has extremely harmful impacts on young people’s long-term well-being and ability to achieve their full potential,” he said.

Bill language and enforcement

The federal bill outlaws any use of federal funds or facilities for “sexually oriented” education for children younger than 10 years old. Sexually oriented education is defined as any description or depiction of sexual activity and any topic including sexual orientation, gender identity, dysphoria, and transgenderism, according to the bill.

It also bans exposure of elementary students to “nude adults, individuals who are stripping, or lewd or lascivious dancing.”

“Many newly implemented sexual education curriculums encourage discussions of sexuality, sexual orientation, transgenderism, and gender ideology as early as kindergarten,” the bill says in citing the need for the proposed bans.

Its restrictions would also apply to public libraries that “target preadolescent children and teach them about concepts like masturbation, pornography, sexual acts, and gender transition,” and local government and private organizations that use federal money “to host and promote sexually oriented events like drag queen story hours and burlesque shows.”

The bill would also allow parents to file a civil lawsuit in federal district court against a government official, government agency, or private entity for violating the measure. It also says schools can’t receive federal money for three fiscal years if they receive two or more injunctions for violations.

“If this bill or a similar one were to pass at the federal level, that would be utterly appalling; it would be a throwback to prior generations, when information about LGBTQ people was widely censored,” Pizer said. “It would be scary and very harmful to young people in educational environments, to get the official message that there’s something wrong with them, there’s something wrong with their families.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
3 Key Strategies for Prepping for State Tests & Building Long-Term Formative Practices
Boost state test success with data-driven strategies. Join our webinar for actionable steps, collaboration tips & funding insights.
Content provided by Instructure
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Promoting Integrity and AI Readiness in High Schools
Learn how to update school academic integrity guidelines and prepare students for the age of AI.
Content provided by Turnitin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Trump Order Tells Linda McMahon to 'Facilitate' Education Department's Closure
An executive order the president signed Thursday directs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to prepare the 45-year-old agency for shutdown.
4 min read
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
Ben Curtis/AP
Federal Trump Admin. Cuts Library Funding. What It Means for Students
In an executive order last week, the Trump administration mandated the reduction of seven agencies, including one that funds libraries around the country: the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).
5 min read
President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House, Monday, Feb. 10, 2025, in Washington.
President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House, Monday, Feb. 10, 2025, in Washington.
Alex Brandon/AP
Federal The Ed. Dept. Axed Its Office of Ed Tech. What That Means for Schools
The office helped districts navigate new and emerging technology affecting schools.
A small group of diverse middle school students sit at their desks with personal laptops in front of each one as they work during a computer lab.
E+/Getty
Federal Letter to the Editor The Feds Should Take More Responsibility for Education
A letter to the editor disagrees with former Gov. Jeb Bush's recent opinion essay.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week