Equity & Diversity

What One State’s Transgender Student Policy Could Mean for Students

By Eesha Pendharkar — September 21, 2022 6 min read
Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin wants districts to adopt a model policy that restricts how schools and teachers deal with transgender students.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A new Virginia model policy that rolls back freedoms for transgender students will be harmful for the mental health and safety of trans, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming students at school, as well as the broader LGBTQ student body, health experts warn.

The model policy introduced by Virginia’s Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin last week asks teachers and other school employees to only refer to students by their legal name and sex assigned at birth unless a parent files a written petition to allow their child to change their pronouns. Even in that case, the legal name and sex “shall not be changed” on school records, the model policy says.

The policy also says a school can’t instruct teachers to hide information about a student’s gender identity from their parents. Finally, it requires transgender students to use bathrooms and play on sports teams aligned with their sex assigned at birth as opposed to their gender identity.

A transgender student is defined by the policy as “a public school student whose parent has requested in writing, due to their child’s persistent and sincere belief that his or her gender differs with his or her sex, that their child be so identified while at school.”

“Probably to me, the most concerning piece of it also is that, you know, it requires almost a forced outing of students to their parents,” said Eden Heilman, Legal Director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia.

“So trans students, who potentially might be at risk of both physical and emotional abuse at home or homelessness, now potentially may be facing even more risk at home, because this policy requires that parents be made aware,” Heilman added.

The model policy delivers a message to transgender, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming kids that they don’t matter, said Stephen Forssell, a professor in the psychological and brain sciences department at George Washington University and director of the university’s LGBT Health Policy and Practice Program.

“When things like this happen, they give license to violent acts, not just against trans kids, but [against] kids who are members of the broader community,” he said. “We do see increases in hate crimes and harassment of the members of the community when these sorts of bills are passed. And it basically says your state thinks you’re not worthy of being protected.”

Students were already concerned about anti-trans bills

The vast majority of transgender and nonbinary youth are concerned about the anti-trans bills and policies being proposed across the country, according to the Trevor Project’s 2022 Mental Health Survey. The nonprofit surveyed almost 34,000 LGBTQ youth ages 13 to 24 across the United States.

Because of state or local laws, 93 percent of transgender and nonbinary youth said that they have worried about access to gender-affirming medical care, 91 percent are worried about their ability to use bathrooms of their choice, and 83 percent about their ability to play sports, according to the survey.

Over the past year, Republican lawmakers in 18 states, including Arizona, Idaho, and Texas have passed laws banning trans students from participating in sports aligned with their gender identity, specifically trans boys wanting to play on girls’ teams. Three states—Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Alabama—also have bans on students using school facilities aligned with their gender identity.

Florida also passed legislation outlawing classroom discussions of gender and sexual identity, which prompted copycat bills across the country. In Alabama, offering gender-affirming care such as prescribing puberty-blocking medication or surgeries is a Class C felony, according to a law passed in 2022.

How Virginia’s proposal differs

But not many states have passed model policies through the department of education requiring districts to adopt guidelines that combine restrictions on sports teams, bathrooms, and pronoun use.

Earlier this month, the Grapevine-Colleyville district in Texas passed a broader version of Virginia’s model policy that includes a ban on discussion of “gender fluidity” in addition to all the other guidelines listed by Youngkin’s administration.

“I think one of the things that makes Virginia a little bit unique in this space is that we had a good policy, and now we’re rolling back a good policy,” Heilman said.

The 2022 model policy rolls back many of the provisions from the 2021 model policy, which was introduced by Youngkin’s predecessor, Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam, to comply with a 2020 state law. The prior model policy was much more inclusive and allowed transgender students to use bathrooms and play on teams of their choice.

“The previous policies implemented under the Northam administration did not uphold constitutional principles and parental rights, and will be replaced,” said Youngkin spokeswoman Macaulay Porter.

“It is not under a school’s or the government’s purview to impose a set of particular ideological beliefs on all students. Key decisions rest, first and foremost, with the parents.”

The “parental rights” angle has often been used by several right-wing advocacy groups and Republican lawmakers to promote anti-LGBTQ legislation, and groups such as The Family Foundation have welcomed Virginia’s proposed changes. Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill, for example, is formally titled the Parental Rights in Education bill.

“I think that that term has been co-opted to speak for a very small number of parents who want to impose their beliefs on other people,” Heilman said. “The reality of it is, the vast majority of parents want their children to be treated like humans and their peers to be treated like humans.”

Parental rights was a winning message during Youngkin’s gubernatorial campaign, according to Forssell of George Washington University.

“This is a very, very trite kind of thing compared with kids getting beaten up and abused and made to feel like, you know, subhuman people,” he said. “Parents’ rights to be bigoted or to enforce their religious views on other people, clearly is not as important as the mental health and, frankly, the safety of kids in these schools.”

State officials say that’s not so. The document makes it clear that “any kind of discrimination, any kind of harassment of students for any reason is something that is not to be tolerated in the public schools of Virginia,” said state department of education spokesman Charles Pyle.

However, there is not much wiggle room for interpretation in the guidelines to allow school boards to pass a version that doesn’t restrict the rights of transgender students, according to Forssell. The 2020 law requires all 132 Virginia districts to pass their own policies that are along the same lines or are even more comprehensive. However, there’s no enforcement mechanism outlined in the model policy so it’s unclear if districts will refuse to comply.

The ACLU of Virginia has been hearing from some districts that they’re concerned about implementing any version of the model policy.

“I think a lot of teachers and administrators and school boards are very concerned about the rights of their students,” Heilman said, “and also what might happen if they follow this, and then they could possibly be in conflict with federal law and how to deal with those issues.”

Virginia’s model policy comes as proposed changes to the federal Title IX law seek to broaden the definition of sex-based harassment and discrimination to include gender identity and sexual orientation.

People may submit public comments on the model policy for a month starting Sept. 26, and then Superintendent of Public Instruction Jillian Balow, appointed by Youngkin, may amend the final draft of the policy based on the comments, Pyle said. The state school board will not have to vote on the model policy.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Classroom Strategies for Building Equity and Student Confidence
Shape equity, confidence, and success for your middle school students. Join the discussion and Q&A for proven strategies.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Disrupting PD Day in Schools with Continuous Professional Learning Experiences
Hear how this NC School District achieved district-wide change by shifting from traditional PD days to year-long professional learning cycles
Content provided by BetterLesson
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity How Can Schools Help Students Process Racial Trauma? A New Program Provides Answers
The pilot program sheds light on the role schools play in helping students heal from racial trauma.
6 min read
Illustration of a woman of color in distress with hands in her face and hair blowing upwards.
Fedrelena/iStock/Getty
Equity & Diversity Q&A How Schools Can Address Racial Stressors, An Expert Explains
A Stanford researcher looks at how schools play a role in interventions for students of color dealing with racial stressors.
6 min read
Student alone in an empty school hallway (blurred). Bullying, discrimination and racism.
Pornpak Khunatorn/iStock/Getty
Equity & Diversity Educational Inequality: 4 Moments in History That Explain Where We Are Today
A new Columbia University report highlights how inequality was embedded in the creation of public education in the United States.
5 min read
This May 8, 1964 file photo shows Linda Brown Smith standing in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan. The refusal of the public school to admit Brown in 1951, then nine years old, because she is black, led to the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the "separate but equal" clause and mandated that schools nationwide must be desegregated.
This May 8, 1964 file photo shows Linda Brown Smith standing in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan. The refusal of the public school to admit Brown in 1951, then nine years old, because she is black, led to the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the "separate but equal" clause and mandated that schools nationwide must be desegregated.
AP Photo
Equity & Diversity The Origins of Racial Inequality in Education
"Uncovering Inequality," a project from Columbia University, chronicles how policies created and sustained inequalities in schools.
4 min read
In this May 13, 2014, file photo National Education Association staff members from Washington joining students, parents and educators at a rally at the Supreme Court in Washington on the 60th anniversary Brown v. Board of Education decision that struck down "separate but equal" laws that kept schools segregated.
In this May 13, 2014, file photo National Education Association staff members from Washington joining students, parents and educators at a rally at the Supreme Court in Washington on the 60th anniversary Brown v. Board of Education decision that struck down "separate but equal" laws that kept schools segregated.
AP Photo