Law & Courts

Lawmakers Debate Wis. Admissions

By Alyson Klein — March 13, 2007 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A group of state lawmakers is seeking to overturn the University of Wisconsin system’s new admissions policy that requires campuses to review each applicant individually and consider factors such as race and past experiences along with academic record.

The legislators say the policy violates a 1973 state law prohibiting state universities from basing admissions decisions on race, gender, or religion.

Nineteen lawmakers, including 18 Republicans and one Democrat, sent a letter Feb. 20 to Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen, a Republican, asking him to give an opinion on the matter. Mr. Van Hollen’s office is reviewing the letter, his spokesman said.

The new policy was approved unanimously last month by the board of regents that governs all 26 of Wisconsin’s public colleges. It would require admissions officers to provide a “holistic review” of each applicant, examining his or her socioeconomic status, membership in any historically underrepresented racial or ethnic group, and evidence of leadership and/or community service, as well as his or her academic record.

State Rep. Steve Nass, a Republican and one of the policy’s leading opponents, said that the new system doesn’t do enough to make sure that colleges are weighing academic achievement as the most important factor in admissions.

“Academics has to be number one. Period,” he said.

Mr. Nass said the changes could lead to a “brain-drain” if high-achieving students who do not get into their first-choice schools go to college outside the state.

But David F. Giroux, a spokesman for the board of regents, argued that not much will change under the new system, since it generally reflects what many of the state’s colleges—including the flagship University of Wisconsin campus in Madison—are doing anyway. He noted that UW-Madison and other campuses are already using a holistic review process in examining applications. He said the board was simply trying to update the system’s official policy, which was enacted in 1972 and is no longer used by some colleges.

See Also

For more stories on this topic see Colleges and Careers.

See other stories on education issues in Wisconsin. See data on Wisconsin’s public school system.

A version of this article appeared in the March 14, 2007 edition of Education Week

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Hidden Costs of Special Ed Vacancies: Solutions for Your District
When provider vacancies hit, students feel it first. Hear what district leaders are doing to keep IEP-related services on track.
Content provided by Huddle Up
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Turn Athletic Facilities Into School-Wide Communication Hubs
Districts are turning idle scoreboards into revenue streams, student learning opportunities, and community platforms. See how yours can too.
Content provided by Digital Scoreboards
Mathematics K-12 Essentials Forum Middle and High School Math: How to Get Struggling Learners on Track
Join this free virtual event to uncover the nature of students’ weaknesses in secondary-level math and find a path forward.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Birthright Citizenship Case Raises Stakes for Schools and Undocumented Students
Educators are paying close attention to the case on Trump's birthright citizenship order.
10 min read
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Jan. 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House on Jan. 20, 2025. The order, now before the U.S. Supreme Court, seeks to limit citizenship for some children born in the United States to immigrant parents without permanent legal status.
Evan Vucci/AP
Law & Courts Appeals Court Revives Lawsuit Over 1st Grader’s Black Lives Matter Drawing
A court revived a 1st grader 's claim she was punished for giving a drawing to a Black classmate.
4 min read
Seen is the drawing made by Viejo Elementary School first-grader B.B. that was entered into evidence. B.B. gave the drawing to her classmate, M.C., who is African American. M.C. thanked B.B.
Pictured is a drawing by a 1st grader in California and given to a Black classmate that is at the center of a First Amendment legal challenge over the student's alleged punishment.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Law & Courts Supreme Court’s Gender Identity Ruling Leaves Schools Seeking Clarity
Advocates say they would welcome more from the Supreme Court on gender-notification policies.
7 min read
The Supreme Court is photographed, Friday, Feb. 27, 2026, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is photographed, Friday, Feb. 27, 2026, in Washington. The high court recently ruled that California policies that sometimes limit or discourage schools from disclosing information to parents about children’s gender transitions and expressions at school likely violate parents’ constitutional rights
Rahmat Gul/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Backs Parents in School Gender Disclosure Fight
The Supreme Court restored an injunction blocking California policies on student gender transitions
8 min read
Teacher’s aide Amelia Mester, wrapped in a Pride flag, urges Escondido Union High School District not to have employees notify parents if they believe a student may be transgender in November 2025. A policy on the issue in the city’s elementary school district is the subject of a federal class-action lawsuit in which a judge just sided against the district.
Teacher’s aide Amelia Mester, wrapped in a Pride flag, urges Escondido Union High School District not to have employees notify parents if they believe a student may be transgender at a meeting in November 2025. Two parents and two teachers from the district sued in 2023, challenging California state guidance concerning student gender transitions and parental notification. The U.S. Supreme Court has now reinstated a lower-court decision overturning those state policies.
Charlie Neuman for The San Diego Union-Tribune/TNS