Law & Courts

Biden’s Title IX Rule to Expand Protections of Trans Students Struck Down

The federal ruling appears to apply nationwide and the incoming Trump administration is unlikely to appeal
By Mark Walsh — January 09, 2025 4 min read
A picture of a gavel on a target.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A federal district judge in Kentucky has struck down the Biden administration’s Title IX regulation that added sexual orientation and transgender status to the definition of sexual discrimination protections.

The decision—the first one to fully consider the merits of the Title IX rule—appears to apply nationwide, which would mean the end of the highly controversial regulation because the incoming Trump administration seems unlikely to appeal.

The ruling—issued Jan. 9—is also the first time a court has found that the regulation interpreted by some as requiring teachers to address transgender students by their preferred names and pronouns violates the First Amendment.

If the regulation is indeed invalidated nationwide, that would also erase provisions providing greater protections to pregnant students and new requirements for sexual harassment complaints as well as the broader definition of sexual discrimination under Title IX to include sexual orientation and gender identity. (The Biden administration recently shelved a separate pending regulation on sports participation by transgender students.)

The decision is the latest in the multi-front legal battle over the Biden-era Title IX rule change. Efforts to both expand and restrict policies related to transgender students in schools remain divisive political fights that animated local, state, and national campaigns and elections. Roughly 3.3 percent of high school students identify as transgender, and 2.2 percent are questioning their gender identity, according to federal data released last fall.

Several other federal district courts and appeals courts had issued or upheld preliminary injunctions blocking the 2024 regulation, and the U.S. Supreme Court last August rejected the Biden administration’s request to narrow the injunctions. The result has been that the rule is blocked in 26 states and at some schools in other states.

Judge agrees with plaintiffs that rule would compel teachers to use students’ preferred names and pronouns

Judge Danny C. Reeves of the U.S. District Court in Lexington, Ky., who had issued one of those injunctions last year in a challenge brought by five states and a Christian educators’ group, on Jan. 9 delivered his final opinion striking down the regulation finalized by the Biden administration in 2024. That regulation effectively extended the scope in Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which bars federally funded educational institutions from discriminating on the basis of sex, to include gender identity.

“[E]xpanding the meaning of ‘on the basis of sex’ to include ‘gender identity’ turns Title IX on its head,” said Reeves, an appointee of President George W. Bush.

Reeves said the U.S. Department of Education relied too heavily in the regulation on the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga., which held that the main federal employment discrimination law, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, covered sexual orientation and gender identity in the workplace.

“The department reads Bostock far too broadly by importing its holding into the context of Title IX,” Reeves said in Tennessee v. Cardona. “The [Supreme] Court in Bostock expressly limited its holding to Title VII.”

The challenge was led by Tennessee (though filed in Kentucky) and joined by Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Virginia, and West Virginia. Christian Educators Association International intervened in the suit to focus on provisions of the regulation that it contends would require teachers to use the names and pronouns preferred by transgender students, even when it went against the teachers’ religious beliefs.

The Education Department did not agree with that group’s argument, but Reeves agreed that “the plaintiffs reasonably fear that teachers’ (and others’) speech concerning gender issues or their failure to use gender-identity-based pronouns would constitute harassment under the Final Rule.”

“Put simply, the First Amendment does not permit the government to chill speech or compel affirmance of a belief with which the speaker disagrees in this manner,” Reeves said.

Court cases continue as Donald Trump set to return to office

The decision comes less than two weeks before President-elect Donald Trump returns to office. He has criticized the Biden Title IX regulation and pledged he would reverse it, but that would take time.

That has led some legal advocates to observe that continuing the legal challenges to the regulation may be the best way for opponents to bring about its demise.

Both Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti, a Republican, and Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal organization involved in several challenges to the regulation, including representing the Christian educators group, issued statements praising the decision.

“Because the Biden rule is vacated altogether, President Trump will be free to take a fresh look at our Title IX regulations when he returns to office,” Skrmetti said.

Kristen Waggoner, the CEO of Alliance Defending Freedom, said, “The Biden administration’s radical attempt to redefine sex not only tossed fairness, safety, and privacy for female students out the window, it also threatened free speech and parental rights.”

There was no immediate reaction from the Biden administration. Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Women’s Law Center, which supports the Biden Title IX rule, said in a statement that the new decision “displays extraordinary disregard for students who are most vulnerable to discrimination and are in the most need for federal protections under the Title IX rule.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Reflections on Evidence-Based Grading Practices: What We Learned for Next Year
Get real insights on evidence-based grading from K-12 leaders.
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Creating Resilient Schools with a Trauma-Responsive MTSS
Join us to learn how school leaders are building a trauma-responsive MTSS to support students & improve school outcomes.
School & District Management Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: We Can’t Engage Students If They Aren’t Here: Strategies to Address the Absenteeism Conundrum
Absenteeism rates are growing fast. Join Peter DeWitt and experts to learn how to re-engage students & families.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Groups Sue Over Trump's Cuts to Education Department Research Arm
This suit seeks the restoration of Institute of Education Sciences staff and contracts abruptly canceled by the Trump administration.
3 min read
Supporters gather outside the U.S. Department of Education in Washington to applaud Education Department employees as they depart their offices for the final time on Friday, March 28, 2025. The rally brought together education supporters, students, parents, and former employees to honor the departing staff as they arrived in 30-minute intervals to collect their belongings.
Supporters gather outside the U.S. Department of Education in Washington to applaud Education Department employees as they depart their offices for the final time on Friday, March 28, 2025. Two organizations representing researchers are suing the department in an attempt to restore the agency's data and research arm, the Institute of Education Sciences.
Moriah Ratner for Education Week
Law & Courts Supreme Court Appears Unlikely to Strike Down School E-Rate Program
The Supreme Court seems unlikely to strike down the E-rate program, though some justices questioned its funding structure and oversight.
5 min read
The Supreme Court in Washington, June 30, 2024.
The U.S. Supreme Court considers a major challenge to the E-rate program for school internet connections on March 26.
Susan Walsh/AP
Law & Courts Trump Asks Supreme Court for OK to Move Ahead With Deep Teacher-Training Cuts
The Trump administration on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to allow it to cut hundreds of millions of dollars for teacher training.
2 min read
President Donald Trump, left, holds up a signed executive order as young people hold up copies of the executive order they signed at an education event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump, left, holds up a signed executive order as young people hold up copies of the executive order they signed at an education event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025. The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to permit the cut of funding for teacher training programs.
Ben Curtis/AP
Law & Courts See All the Lawsuits Filed Over Trump's Education Policies
Here’s a look at the moves that have drawn litigation, and where the complaints stand.
5 min read
Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference held at Trump Tower, Friday, Sept., 6, 2024 in New York.
Donald Trump speaks during a news conference held at Trump Tower on Sept. 6, 2024 in New York. His education actions since returning to the White House in January 2025 have drawn numerous lawsuits alleging he's overstepping his authority.
Stefan Jeremiah/AP