Student Achievement

Study Finds Out-of-School Factors Less of a Hindrance

By Sean Cavanagh — October 01, 2004 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

It is a question that affixes itself to countless debates in education: To what extent do poverty, instability at home, and other socioeconomic factors undermine the ability of students and schools to prosper academically?

Now, a new study attempts to quantify the advantages and disadvantages students face outside of school—defined as “teachability"—and to evaluate how successful states are in helping them learn, despite those hurdles.

“The Teachability Index: Can Disadvantaged Students Learn?,” is available online from the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.

“The Teachability Index: Can Disadvantaged Students Learn?,” released by the Manhattan Institute last week, concludes that students are somewhat easier to teach, given socioeconomic factors, than they were 30 years ago.

The report shows that “student disadvantages are not destiny,” its authors say. “Some schools do much better than others at educating students with low levels of teachability.”

Jay P. Greene, a senior fellow at the institute, who co-wrote the report with his colleague Greg Forster, said the findings point to a “false sense of nostalgia” that pervades discussions about schools, in which the public imagines a past with fewer out-of-school distractions, when students were easier to teach.

‘Teachability’ Index

The report bases its teachability index on 16 factors that affect students’ ability to learn, and tracks them from 1970 to 2001. Those factors include preschool enrollment, the proportion of non-English-speaking students, levels of parents’ education, family poverty, and health measures. It also includes race, the authors note, because research shows minority students face particular disadvantages, such as potential discrimination. The researchers relied on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. Department of Education, and other existing sources.

The authors then ranked each state on what they determined to be the teachability of its students. North Dakota ranks at the top, followed by Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and South Dakota. The District of Columbia ranks lowest, with New Mexico, Arizona, Texas, and Louisiana also near the bottom.

The study then couples the teachability index with an analysis of scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress to establish a “school performance index,” or a ranking of how well states are teaching students, given socioeconomic disadvantages. Montana ranks first as gauged by that measure, followed by Colorado, Kansas, Texas, and North Carolina. The District of Columbia is rated at the bottom, with Hawaii, Mississippi, Alabama, and California also ranking low on the index.

Mr. Greene, who heads the Manhattan Institute’s Davie, Fla.-based education research office, said states with the strongest performance rankings tended to have strong systems of testing and accountability and allow for school choice, through charter schools and other options. In previous research, Mr. Greene has argued that school choice benefits disadvantaged students and raises performance among regular public schools that face new competition.

But Larry Mishel, the president of the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute, said he doubted the findings of the new study. He questioned the conclusion that student “teachability,” or the ability to learn given their circumstances, remained mostly stagnant during the 1970s and ’80s, then leaped upward during the 1990s. The Manhattan Institute attributes that trend partly to more favorable economic conditions, student academic readiness, and family environments.

“Does anyone really think that something changed dramatically during the 1990s?” said Mr. Mishel, whose organization studies economic policy and its effect on low- and middle-income workers. Teachability is “something that should be studied,” he added, “but I don’t think [they’ve] done the job.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Reflections on Evidence-Based Grading Practices: What We Learned for Next Year
Get real insights on evidence-based grading from K-12 leaders.
Content provided by Otus
Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum How AI Use Is Expanding in K-12 Schools
Join this free virtual event to explore how AI technology is—and is not—improving K-12 teaching and learning.
Student Achievement K-12 Essentials Forum How to Build and Scale Effective K-12 State & District Tutoring Programs
Join this free virtual summit to learn from education leaders, policymakers, and industry experts on the topic of high-impact tutoring.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Student Achievement Spotlight Spotlight on Adolescent Intervention
This Spotlight will help you explore effective interventions to address learning gaps, support literacy development, and more.
Student Achievement Here’s What Makes Tutoring Work for Academic Recovery
Tutoring can help boost student achievement, but there are concerns about how to scale it.
4 min read
Teacher helps her student, little girl, with reading and writing.
E+
Student Achievement The Reasons Behind the Poor NAEP Scores, According to Teachers
Educators on social media weigh in on what's behind the recent drop in student test scores.
1 min read
Image of a person using a computer, with glasses, papers, and pencil on the desk too.
iStock/Getty
Student Achievement Districts Recovering From an Achievement Slide Have This in Common
Districts' progress may be related to how they used federal COVID-relief funds, a new analysis finds.
4 min read
Image of data and demographics.
Enis Aksoy/DigitalVision Vectors