School & District Management

Reporter’s Notebook

November 19, 2003 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

State-Financed Pre-K Shows Positive Effect, New Research Says

Children in state-financed prekindergarten programs make learning gains through the year and continue to show academic growth in kindergarten, concludes research presented here this month at the annual convention of the National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Researchers from three universities have been studying the structure and child outcomes of public pre-K programs in six states: Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio, and parts of California and New York.

By looking at test-score results by family-income level, they’ve found that nonpoor children in state-financed pre-K programs perform at roughly the national average, while poor children start out scoring below those averages but then bring their scores close to those of children from higher-income families.

“The fact that we do see progress tells me that [such programs] are partially meeting their goal,” said Richard Clifford, a research associate professor of education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Researchers from the University of Virginia, in Charlottesville, and the University of California Los Angeles, are also involved in the ongoing study.

However, the researchers are not yet able to explain why many of the programs are scoring only in the “mediocre” range on a widely used measure of classroom quality, the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, Revised Edition.

When the classroom-quality scores were examined more closely, they showed that pre-K teachers were keeping children engaged, had positive views toward children, and gave them a good deal of choice in activities. Classrooms were also well-equipped with furniture and materials.

But teachers in the programs being studied are getting the lowest scores on attending to routine tasks, such as making sure children wash their hands after they go to the restroom and before they eat. Children are also spending too much time lining up and making transitions from one activity to another, the research shows.

“We wish we were seeing more social interaction during those times,” said Sharon Ritchie, an education researcher at UCLA, who also spoke during a session here.

The researchers suggested that a lack of well-trained teachers does not appear to be the problem. A significant proportion—almost 70 percent—of the pre-K teachers in the study have bachelor’s degrees or higher, making them a more highly educated group than most who work in early-childhood education.

The growth of state pre-K programs is one reason the Washington-based NAEYC decided to revise its position statement about curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation.

As last updated in 1991, the statement did not address such current issues as the demand for accountability and the growing diversity of families, NAEYC officials said at the Chicago gathering.

The new statement, which was adopted just before the Nov. 5-8 conference, was jointly approved by the NAEYC and the National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education.

The new position statement, “Early Childhood Curriculum, Assessment, and Program Evaluation: Building an Effective, Accountable System in Programs for Children Birth Through Age 8,” is scheduled to be available online from National Association for the Education of Young Children.

According to the updated statement, curriculum for young children should keep them active and engaged. In addition, it says, assessment results should be used to improve learning, and early-childhood-education programs should be evaluated using multiple measures.

Leaders of the two organizations said they hope the policy will guide both early-childhood educators and state policymakers as they work to improve programs serving children from birth through age 8, and try to meet the demands of the federal No Child Left Behind Act.

“We are tremendously excited about this position statement and about the significance it will have in our field,” said Marilou Hyson, the NAEYC’s associate executive director for professional development.

What’s more, the previous vision statement addressed only programs serving children ages 3 to 8. The new one covers the time from birth to age 3 as well.

Because of that, the organizations prepared detailed descriptions of recommended instructional and assessment practices for educators working with infants and toddlers, as well as educators of preschoolers and children in the primary grades.

The new statement also says considerably more about the use of assessment than the previous one.

“We want to send a clear message that good early-childhood programs make assessment a central part of their work,” Ms. Hyson said.

The two professional groups also maintain that random sampling of children—instead of testing each child—is preferred when educators are conducting large-scale tests.

—Linda Jacobson

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Reimagining Grading in K-12 Schools: A Conversation on the Value of Standards-Based Grading
Hear from K-12 educational leaders and explore standards-based grading benefits and implementation strategies and challenges
Content provided by Otus
Reading & Literacy Webinar How Background Knowledge Fits Into the ‘Science of Reading’ 
Join our webinar to learn research-backed strategies for enhancing reading comprehension and building cultural responsiveness in the classroom.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Innovative Strategies for Data & Assessments
Join our webinar to learn strategies for actionable instruction using assessment & analysis.
Content provided by Edulastic

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management The Central Office Is a Mystery. A Researcher Broke the Code
Central office staff are largely directly focused on keeping things running rather than instruction, according to new research.
4 min read
Conceptual image of an organizational chart.
Kubkoo/iStock/Getty
School & District Management Better Principal Data Is Critical to Close Equity Gaps, Groups Tell Feds
Advocates argue that the data will help state policy makers, preparation programs, and advocates make better decisions.
5 min read
Assessment review data 599911460
vladwei/iStock/Getty<br/>
School & District Management 'Don't Wait': How Women Educators Can Reach the Central Office—And Beyond
Two leaders of color share their education paths from the classroom to central office—and offer tips for moving up the ladder.
10 min read
Simple flat vector illustration of a businesswoman in red heels holding up a giant light bulb with gears all around her.
iStock/Getty
School & District Management America's School Buildings Are Crumbling, and It's a 'National Security Issue'
The country's investments in school buildings are falling further behind pressing needs each year, advocates argue.
6 min read
Students walk past an open vent for the aging HVAC system at Jim Hill High School in Jackson, Miss., Jan. 12, 2023. A litany of infrastructure issues at many of the school district's aging campuses make for tough choices on spending COVID recovery funds on infrastructure or academics.
Students walk past an open vent for the aging HVAC system at Jim Hill High School in Jackson, Miss., Jan. 12, 2023. A litany of infrastructure issues at many of the school district's aging campuses make for tough choices on spending COVID recovery funds on infrastructure or academics.
Rogelio V. Solis/AP