Equity & Diversity

Race-Linked Enrollment Policy In Seattle Struck Down

By Mark Walsh — April 24, 2002 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Seattle school district must stop using race as a factor in assigning students to popular high schools, because the policy violates a 1998 state ballot measure prohibiting racial preferences in school admissions, a federal appeals court ruled last week.

“The racial tiebreaker ... is inherently invidious,” said the opinion by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. The San Francisco-based court overturned a 2001 ruling by a federal judge in Seattle that upheld the district’s policy of promoting racial diversity in its high schools.

The 47,000-student district has an open-enrollment plan for its 10 high schools, but it strives to keep enrollment within 15 percentage points of the district’s overall racial makeup: 40 percent non-Hispanic white students, and 60 percent students of other racial or ethnic groups.

Students apply for their top three high school choices, but in 2000-01, five high schools were oversubscribed. The first tiebreaker gives a preference to students with siblings at the desired high school.

The second tiebreaker is based entirely on race. Students whose race will move a school closer to the desired racial makeup are given a preference to enroll. The racial tiebreaker determined about 10 percent of high school assignments last school year, the appeals court said.

A group called Parents Involved in Community Schools challenged the policy as a violation of the Washington Civil Rights Act, also known as Initiative 200, and the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law. The suit named as plaintiffs four white families affected or likely to be affected by the racial tiebreaker, including two assigned to a school that required taking three city buses to get to and from school. The parents enrolled their children in private school.

A U.S. district court judge in Seattle upheld the policy last year on both state and federal legal grounds. But in its April 16 decision, the 9th Circuit appellate panel said the use of the racial tiebreaker violates the Washington state initiative against racial preferences.

‘Remarkably Clear’

The court said the state measure was “remarkably clear.” A district “shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race in the operation of public education,” it states. Although both whites and nonwhites might benefit from the preference at different times, “two wrongs do not make a right,” the court added.

Because it struck down the policy under the state law, the court said it did not need to decide whether the policy also violated the 14th Amendment’s equal-protection clause.

“That would have been a decision of more significant impact for federal law,” said Harry J.F. Korrell, a lawyer for the challengers. “But this still means states can feel a little more confident adopting similar measures.”

Seattle Superintendent Joseph Olchefske said in a statement that he was deeply disappointed by the ruling.

“It is our job to educate all students to the best of our ability, and experience tells us that students thrive in a diverse environment,” he said.

The school board agreed on April 17 to request a rehearing before a larger panel of judges on the 9th Circuit court.

A version of this article appeared in the April 24, 2002 edition of Education Week as Race-Linked Enrollment Policy In Seattle Struck Down


School Climate & Safety K-12 Essentials Forum Strengthen Students’ Connections to School
Join this free event to learn how schools are creating the space for students to form strong bonds with each other and trusted adults.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
IT Infrastructure & Management Webinar
Future-Proofing Your School's Tech Ecosystem: Strategies for Asset Tracking, Sustainability, and Budget Optimization
Gain actionable insights into effective asset management, budget optimization, and sustainable IT practices.
Content provided by Follett Learning
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity Opinion 70 Years of Abandonment: The Failed Promise of 'Brown v. Board'
If the nation is going to refuse integration, Black people must demand we revisit the separate but equal doctrine, writes Bettina L. Love.
4 min read
A Black student is isolated from their classmates by an aisle in the classroom.
Xia Gordon for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Opinion 'Brown v. Board of Education' at 70: A Dream Dissolved
This anniversary should remind us that progress is not inevitable. We stand now at a critical juncture.
R. L’Heureux Lewis-McCoy
4 min read
A young Black woman's image dissolves in the smoke.
iStock/Getty Images
Equity & Diversity Opinion Equity? Equality? How Educators Can Tell the Difference
Educators offer advice and examples for giving students what they need, rather than simply treating everyone the same.
10 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
Equity & Diversity Judge Says State Can't Block Teachers From Discussing Critical Race Theory
The rule stops short of more broadly blocking Arkansas from enforcing its ban on certain topics.
2 min read
Students make their way into Little Rock Central High School on Aug. 24, 2020, for the first day of classes in the Little Rock School District. A federal judge ruled, Tuesday, May 7, 2024, that Arkansas cannot prevent two high school teachers from discussing critical race theory in the classroom, but stopped short of more broadly blocking the state from enforcing its ban on “indoctrination” in public schools. The prohibition is being challenged by two teachers and two students at Little Rock Central High School, site of the 1957 desegregation crisis.
Students make their way into Little Rock Central High School in Little Rock, Ark., on Aug. 24, 2020, for the first day of classes.
Tommy Metthe/Arkansas Democrat-Gazette via AP