Budget & Finance

Alabama Voters Reject Gov. Riley’s Tax Plan

By Erik W. Robelen — September 17, 2003 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

With voters in Alabama offering a resounding “no” to Gov. Bob Riley’s $1.2 billion tax referendum last week, state leaders are warning of looming spending cuts for education and other government services.

Alabama Superintendent of Education Ed Richardson talks with reporters in Montgomery after voters overwhelmingly defeated a $1.2 billion tax referendum last week.

Alabama Superintendent of Education Ed Richardson talks with reporters in Montgomery after voters overwhelmingly defeated a $1.2 billion tax referendum last week.
—Photograph by Dave Martin/AP

Sixty-eight percent of the nearly 1.3 million Alabamians who went to the polls Sept. 9 rejected the referendum, The Birmingham News reported.

The legislature was expected to convene this week in a special session to write a budget for fiscal 2004, which begins Oct. 1. And while some tough budget reductions will be required—an estimated $100 million for K-12 education alone— the Republican governor and other leaders have predicted that the biggest shock will come next year, when far more Draconian cuts will be needed.

As the results became clear last week, Gov. Riley said: “Ladies and gentleman, I have heard what the people of Alabama have said, and they said very clearly tonight, ‘We do want you to be good stewards, but we want a smaller government until you prove to us that you are stewards of our money.’”

Mr. Riley had promoted education as the centerpiece of his plan to transform Alabama with the tax package. (“Ala. Measure Would Raise Taxes and Hopes,” Sept. 3, 2003.)

One of the biggest obstacles the first- term governor faced was a citizenry profoundly distrustful of government. Opponents capitalized on the sentiment, running ads that warned that state legislators couldn’t be trusted to spend the extra money on the programs promised by the governor.

The plan had proposed to institute merit-based college scholarships, extend the school year by five days, and expand the state’s reading initiative, among other measures. It also had sought to impose new accountability demands on schools and state government, including provisions to ensure better financial management by school districts, end tenure for some new school administrators, and streamline the teacher dismissal process.

‘Too Big, Too Fast’?

To pay for his plans, Mr. Riley had called for rewriting the state tax code, and eventually bringing in an extra $1.2 billion annually in state and local taxes. He argued, however, that many lower-income Alabamians would actually owe less in taxes overall. Alabama currently has the lowest combined state and local taxes in the nation.

Larry J. Sabato, the director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, argued that the vote in Alabama—about 2-to-1 against higher taxes—was echoing across the country. “Unfortunately, there is a lesson there,” he said. “I’ve already heard elected officials in several places say, ‘So much for tax increases.’”

Moreover, he added, “they saw a conservative Republican stick his neck out in ‘Nixon goes to China’ fashion and get his head handed to him on a plate.”

But David Azbell, a spokesman for Gov. Riley, said other states should not over-interpret the vote. “I don’t think other states have the level of cynicism [of government] that Alabama has,” Mr. Azbell said. “Alabama is probably the most conservative state in the union, and you couple that staunch conservatism with just almost a resentment of state government. ... That made this very difficult to pass.”

Cynicism may not have been the only factor. Marty Connors, the chairman of the Alabama Republican Party—whose executive committee opposed the referendum—cited another reason.

“It failed because it was too big, too fast,” he said.

"[T]he message from the voters is: Alabama families live within their means, Montgomery must live within its means,” said John Giles, the head of the Christian Coalition of Alabama, which campaigned against the tax plan.

Mr. Riley has projected that the state will have a nearly $700 million shortfall for fiscal 2004. The state budget for the current fiscal year is $17.1 billion.

Cuts Ahead

Ed Richardson, the state schools superintendent, predicted that the state will see cuts to precollegiate education this school year and well into the future. The current state K-12 budget is $3.02 billion.

“About $100 million will have to be cut out of the budget this year,” Mr. Richardson said of the fiscal year that begins next month. “We’re looking at textbooks and teacher supplies.” He added: “We’re looking at about a $300 million cut in K-12 next year.”

Mr. Richardson said that cut would result in layoffs of more than 4,000 teachers and 2,000 support workers. He also said the state would have to trim back its reading initiative, which now reaches 450 schools, to about 120 schools.

Some of the governor’s proposed accountability measures had been welcome news to Mr. Giles of the state chapter of the Christian Coalition, but he wasn’t persuaded that schools needed more money.

“We have blown our [administrative costs] way out of proportion, and are diverting resources away from the children, away from the classroom, and into some jobs program,” he contended.

Gov. Riley, however, and the many education and business leaders who backed his plan, had argued that the tax package’s combination of more accountability and more money, carefully targeted, would have made a big difference to public schools.

To see cuts will be hard for schools, said Mr. Richardson. “I have asked our schools to meet very high academic standards, to improve student achievement,” he said. “You would hope that effort would be rewarded, and instead they’re just being penalized.”

Related Tags:

Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
What’s Next for Teaching and Learning? Key Trends for the New School Year
The past 18 months changed the face of education forever, leaving teachers, students, and families to adapt to unprecedented challenges in teaching and learning. As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
How Data and Digital Curriculum Can Drive Personalized Instruction
As we return from an abnormal year, it’s an educator’s top priority to make sure the lessons learned under adversity positively impact students during the new school year. Digital curriculum has emerged from the pandemic
Content provided by Kiddom
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Leadership for Racial Equity in Schools and Beyond
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reveal systemic racial disparities in educational opportunity, there are revelations to which we can and must respond. Through conscientious efforts, using an intentional focus on race, school leaders can
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Budget & Finance Why Failing to Require Masks Could Cost Districts Millions Later
Some insurance providers are threatening to cancel districts' coverage this school year—particularly if they break statewide mask mandates.
9 min read
Image of a dial that assesses problems, dangers, risks, and liabilities.
iStock/Getty
Budget & Finance Will Teachers Get Vaccinated for $1,000?
More and more districts are offering cash to employees who get vaccinated, hoping that the money will help tamp down COVID-19 spread.
6 min read
Image of a dollar bill folded into an upward arrow.
ImagePixel/iStock/Getty
Budget & Finance Opinion Three Tips for Spending COVID-19 Funds in Evidence-Based Ways
If COVID-19 funds targeted for evidence-based practices are going to deliver, it's crucial to be clear on what evidence is actually helpful.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Budget & Finance How Kids Benefit When Principals Get a Say in Spending Federal COVID-19 Aid
In some districts, principals play a key role in targeting federal pandemic relief money, but in other places they're left out.
8 min read
Nicole Moore, the principal at Indian Mills School, stands near the summer literacy program held in a small lot at Fawn Lake Village in Shamong, New Jersey on July 6, 2021. Moore worked with teachers to develop a summer literacy program for disadvantaged students who live in the district.
Nicole Moore, principal of Indian Mills School, in Shamong, N.J., worked with a teacher and the district superintendent to start a summer program using federal aid for COVID-19 relief.
Eric Sucar for Education Week