Suit Says NCLB’s Demands Conflict With Those of IDEA

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Two Illinois school districts have sued the U.S. Department of Education, claiming that some of the accountability measures of the No Child Left Behind Act should be invalidated because they are in direct conflict with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

The 1,630-student Ottawa High School District 140, the 2,055-student Ottawa Elementary School District 141, and the parents of four students who attend schools in the districts filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Chicago on Feb. 3. Also named as a defendant was the Illinois state board of education.

Raymond A. Hauser, the lawyer representing the districts, said that the IDEA’S requirement that each special education student have an individualized education plan is contrary to the requirement under the No Child Left Behind law that special education students count as one subgroup whose test results help determine whether a school makes adequate yearly progress, the key measure for holding schools accountable under the law.

Getting a group of students to meet the goal of passing the state test required under the No Child Left Behind law demands a “categorical, systematic plan,” Mr. Hauser said, and that would require educators to adjust students’ IEPs to meet one goal, to the detriment of some children in special education.

“There are some kids who fall into this who are never going to meet state standards,” he said.

First Such Case

The suit asks the court to invalidate the sections of the No Child Left Behind Act that deal with the requirement to test students and the provisions for improvement of schools that do not make adequate yearly progress.

Tom Hutton, a staff lawyer with the National School Boards Association in Alexandria, Va., said the Illinois lawsuit is the first to claim that the No Child Left Behind law is in conflict with the IDEA.

The Illinois state board just received the suit and will be coordinating its response with the state attorney general’s office, said Naomi Velasquez-Greene, a spokeswoman for the board. The federal Education Department has no comment on pending litigation, said Ed Walsh, a department spokesman.

Vol. 24, Issue 23, Page 23

Published in Print: February 16, 2005, as Suit Says NCLB’s Demands Conflict With Those of IDEA
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >