Federal

Quayle Bill To Dissolve Education Department Differs From Proposal Made by Secretary Bell

By Eileen White — November 09, 1981 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Education Department would be stripped of its Cabinet-level status and most of its functions, and be reduced to a small education-assistance agency under a bill scheduled to be introduced in the Senate late last week by Dan Quayle, Republican of Indiana.

The Senator planned to announce the bill’s provisions—including the transfer of most department programs to other federal agencies—at a press conference on Friday, according to an aide in Senator Quayle’s office.

In a letter informing other Senators of his intentions, Mr. Quayle called the abolition of the Education Department “a major step forward in returning the responsibility and resources necessary to educate our children where they properly belong—in the local community.”

His proposal asserts that:

  • “Parents have the primary responsibility for the education of their children";
  • “The primary public responsibility for education belongs to the states [and] the local school systems"; and
  • “A cabinet-level Department of Education threatens to pre-empt the role of parents, localities, and the states in determining policy for education.”

The measure has not received the support of the Reagan Administration, although Mr. Quayle has met with members of the Administration task force that is formulating the President’s plan to dismantle the department, according to James Wolfe, a legislative assistant to the Senator.

Mr. Quayle also has discussed his proposal with Secretary of Education Terrel H. Bell, who was unwilling to support the bill, Mr. Wolfe said.

Mr. Bell was unavailable for comment.

The bill would create a much smaller agency than the “national education foundation” recommended by Secretary Bell to the President last August. At that time, Secretary Bell listed education research and statistics-gathering as two of the most important functions of a federal education foundation.

Mr. Quayle would transfer the offices that perform those functions to other agencies.

Changes Recommended

However, the Education Department’s office for civil rights, for which the Secretary had recommended sweeping changes—including a possible transfer to the Justice Department—would remain unchanged in the agency proposed by Mr. Quayle.

The governance structure of the assistance agency also differs from the Secretary’s proposal.

The Secretary had suggested a foundation governed by a board of directors, like the 24-member governing board of the National Science Foundation. Mr. Quayle’s proposal includes a single director and two assistant directors.

The proposal would retain in the education-assistance agency most programs in primary, secondary, and higher education. Bilingual education, vocational and adult education, the education-consolidation package, impact aid, and Indian education are among those programs.

Proposal Programs

Programs to be transferred under the proposal include:

  • Handicapped education and rehabilitative services, library services, and most of the department’s support to special institutions, to the Department of Health and Human Services;
  • The National Center for Education Statistics and telecommunications programs, to the Commerce Department;
  • The guaranteed student-loan program, to the Treasury Department;
  • Foreign-language programs, to the State Department;
  • The National Institute of Education, to the National Science Foundation;
  • Museum services, to the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities;
  • Veterans cost-of-instruction programs, to the Veterans’ Administration;
  • College housing-construction loans, to the Department of Housing and Urban Development;
  • Surplus property for educational purposes, to the General Services Administration, and
  • The federal data-acquisition council to the Office of Management and Budget.

A version of this article appeared in the November 09, 1981 edition of Education Week as Quayle Bill To Dissolve Education Department Differs From Proposal Made by Secretary Bell

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
AI in Schools: What 1,000 Districts Reveal About Readiness and Risk
Move beyond “ban vs. embrace” with real-world AI data and practical guidance for a balanced, responsible district policy.
Content provided by Securly
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
K-12 Lens 2026: What New Staffing Data Reveals About District Operations
Explore national survey findings and hear how districts are navigating staffing changes that affect daily operations, workload, and planning.
Content provided by Frontline Education
Education Funding Webinar Congress Approved Next Year’s Federal School Funding. What’s Next?
Congress passed the budget, but uncertainty remains. Experts explain what districts should expect from federal education policy next.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Why K-12 Educators Are Alarmed About Proposed Student Loan Limits
They worry that the new loan limits could put a leak in the teacher and administrator pipeline.
4 min read
New graduates line up before the start of a college commencement at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, N.J, May 17, 2018. A proposed regulation could exclude education from a list of "professional" graduate degrees, limiting federal loans for students in the field.
New graduates line up before the start of a college commencement at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, N.J, May 17, 2018. A proposed regulation could exclude education from a list of "professional" graduate degrees, limiting federal loans for students in the field.
Seth Wenig/AP
Federal Opinion We Shouldn’t Have to Choose Between Federal Overreach and Abandonment in K-12
Why is federal power being used to occupy our cities but not protect our students’ civil rights?
Sally Iverson
4 min read
Large hand making pressure over group of small, silhouetted figures. Oppressions, manipulation. Contemporary art collage. Photocopy effect. Concept of world crisis, business, economy, control
Education Week + iStock
Federal Ed. Dept. Hangs Banner of Charlie Kirk Alongside MLK Jr., Ben Franklin
It's part of a celebration of the nation's 250th anniversary.
1 min read
New banners of Booker T. Washington, Catharine Beecher and Charlie Kirk hang from the Department of Education, Sunday, March 1, 2026, in Washington.
New banners of Booker T. Washington, Catharine Beecher, and Charlie Kirk hang from the U.S. Department of Education on March 1, 2026, in Washington.
Allison Robbert/AP
Federal Ed. Dept. Wants to Revamp Assistance Program It Calls 'Duplicative,' 'Confusing'
The department's Comprehensive Centers have already been through a year of shakeups.
3 min read
A first grade classroom at a school in Colorado Springs, on Feb. 12, 2026.
A 1st grade classroom at a school in Colorado Springs, Colo., on Feb. 12, 2026. The U.S. Department of Education released a proposal to rework a decades-old program charged with helping states and school districts problem-solve and deploy new initiatives, calling the current structure “duplicative” and “confusing.”
Kevin Mohatt for Education Week