Education Letter to the Editor

NCLB Is Not a ‘Mandate,’ Says GAO in Clarification

May 24, 2005 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

We noted with interest your article of May 4, 2005, entitled “NCLB Cases Face Hurdles in the Courts,” For future reference, we want to be sure that you fully understand U.S. Government Accountability Office findings on the No Child Left Behind Act.

The GAO has not examined the overall adequacy of funding for, or costs associated with, this federal legislation. The one funding analysis the GAO has done was a congressionally mandated study of the act’s annual testing requirements. In our 2003 report (GAO-03-39), we estimated that congressional appropriations would cover anywhere from 51 percent to 144 percent of states’ total costs, depending on the types of test questions states chose. (Multiple-choice questions are the least expensive; long, open-ended questions are the most expensive.)

The funding Congress has appropriated for assessments represents a small portion of all federal funding under Title I. In fiscal year 2002, for example, states received $387 million for assessments; this is less than 4 percent of the $10.3 billion in total funds states received for Title I that year.

Regarding the No Child Left Behind Act’s status as a mandate, the GAO has reported that, under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, the legislation is not considered a mandate because the requirements are a condition of federal assistance. Various definitions, exclusions, and exceptions under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act preclude certain federal actions from being considered mandates, even though they may have potentially significant impacts on nonfederal parties.

I hope this clarifies the GAO’s reported findings.

Paul Anderson

Managing Director

Office of Public Affairs

U.S. Government Accountability Office

Washington, D.C.


Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
English-Language Learners Webinar English Learners and the Science of Reading: What Works in the Classroom
ELs & emergent bilinguals deserve the best reading instruction! The Reading League & NCEL join forces on best practices. Learn more in our webinar with both organizations.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Teaching Webinar
Challenging the Stigma: Emotions and STEM
STEM isn't just equations and logic. Join this webinar and discover how emotions fuel innovation, creativity, & problem-solving in STEM!
Content provided by Project Lead The Way

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: February 7, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: January 31, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: January 17, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education In Their Own Words The Stories That Stuck With Us, 2023 Edition
Our newsroom selected five stories as among the highlights of our work. Here's why.
4 min read
102523 IMSE Reading BS
Adria Malcolm for Education Week