Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

Critic of SAT Favors Anecdotes Over Facts

July 11, 2006 3 min read

To the Editor:

In his Commentary “UnSATisfactory: Why Education’s Most Famous Test Fails the Test “ (June 14, 2006), Walt Gardner is willing to accept assumptions, the advertised claims of commercial coaching firms, and statements from an unpublished study over fact and dozens of published scientific studies. In fully embracing these unsubstantiated statements and dismissing accumulated evidence, he promotes folklore over science, accepting misstatement and perception as fact.

There have been 10 separate, peer-reviewed studies published of the effects of coaching on the SAT across different groups of students. The majority of these studies were conducted by academic researchers with no affiliation to the College Board. They all have concluded that, after about 40 hours of classroom time, additional homework, and fees as high as $1,000 per student, coaching increased scores on the SAT verbal section (now “critical reading”) only by from 8 to 15 points, and on the SAT math section only by from 15 to 23 points. The most recent study was conducted by Derek C. Briggs, a professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Mr. Gardner ignores all of this research.

Mr. Gardner also cites a study by one selective, test-optional college demonstrating that, after 20 years, there was essentially no difference in graduation rates and only 0.05 in grade point average (on a 4.0 scale) between those who did and did not submit admission-test scores. He implies that this single study dismisses the accumulated evidence for validity of admissions tests from hundreds of studies at hundreds of colleges.

Meta-analyses of these studies confirm that admissions tests predict freshmen grades, cumulative grades, persistence, and graduation rates nearly as well—and better for some disciplines—as four years of high school grades. But the grades vs. test scores argument is a false dichotomy, since colleges can use both grades and test scores. When they do, validity is maximized for all groups of students.

Mr. Gardner does not offer a solution, but rather takes the position that admissions tests are not useful. This year, 42 percent of college-bound seniors taking the SAT reported having an A average in high school and a mean GPA of 3.33. At some elite private colleges, about 70 percent of students who sent SAT scores reported having a high school GPA of 4.0 or higher. When the vast majority of a college’s applicants all have A’s, grades are no longer helpful in distinguishing among applicants. Such institutions are forced to use other factors to make admissions decisions, such as activities, the rigor of courses completed, and the quality of the high schools attended.

Unfortunately, students have little influence over the quality of their high schools, and in some instances lack access to rigorous courses like Advanced Placement and opportunity to engage in school activities. Eliminating the only standardized measure available is not helpful to anyone. This point is well understood. In fact, the vast majority of colleges continue to use the SAT.

Educational discussions, including those about college admissions, are too often based on misinformation and speculation. Mr. Gardner reinforces this harmful, anti-scientific practice of characterizing anecdote as fact by ignoring research that could illuminate both the benefits and the limitations of standardized testing, grades, student essays, references, and other tools. We need to consider facts when debating the important educational decisions that are made concerning our children.

Wayne Camara

Vice President of Research

The College Board

New York, N.Y.

A version of this article appeared in the July 12, 2006 edition of Education Week as Critic of SAT Favors Anecdotes Over Facts

Events

School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Branding your district matters. This webinar will provide you with practical tips and strategies to elevate your brand from three veteran professionals, each of whom has been directly responsible for building their own district’s brand.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Nearly two-thirds of U.S. school districts are using hybrid learning right now with varying degrees of success. Students and teachers are getting restless and frustrated with online learning, making curriculum engagement difficult and disjointed. While
Content provided by Samsung

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools
Special Education Teacher
Chicago, Illinois
JCFS Chicago
Elementary Teacher - Scholars Academy
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools
Clinical Director
Garden Prairie, IL, US
Camelot Education

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read