Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

Cambridge Capstone Disputes Commentary

July 17, 2012 1 min read

To the Editor:

The Commentary “In ‘Assessing’ Writing, Speed Kills,” by Will Fitzhugh (June 20, 2012) contained two significant inaccuracies regarding the College Board’s AP/Cambridge Capstone Program.

Mr. Fitzhugh claimed that students enrolled in the AP/Cambridge Capstone Research Project will only be allowed to base their papers on a limited number of topics. This is incorrect. Students may choose any subjects they wish, in consultation with their teachers.

Second, Mr. Fitzhugh was wrong to suggest these research papers would be scored by computer. Like the current process for scoring free-response sections of Advanced Placement exams, research papers will be evaluated by highly trained educators who are experts in the subject matter of each paper.

The AP/Cambridge Capstone Program was developed based on feedback from higher education institutions and other organizations that indicated high school students needed to enter college with stronger backgrounds in the 21st-century knowledge and skills essential for success in today’s global marketplace—specifically, research, extended-writing, presentation, and collaborative skills.

The AP/Cambridge Capstone Research Project was designed to give students the opportunity to develop practical skills in research methodology and the skills to manage a sustained piece of academic work. The College Board understands the importance of providing students the freedom to choose a research topic that thoroughly engages them. The evaluation of such a nuanced, multilayered project can only be conducted by highly trained human readers.

John Williamson

Senior Director

AP/Cambridge Capstone

New York, N.Y.

A version of this article appeared in the July 18, 2012 edition of Education Week as Cambridge Capstone Disputes Commentary

Events

Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
The 4 Biggest Challenges of MTSS During Remote Learning: How Districts Are Adapting
Leaders share ways they have overcome the biggest obstacles of adapting a MTSS or RTI framework in a hybrid or remote learning environment.
Content provided by Panorama Education
Student Well-Being Online Summit Keeping Students and Teachers Motivated and Engaged
Join experts to learn how to address teacher morale, identify students with low engagement, and share what is working in remote learning.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Join us for our NBOE 2021 Winter Teacher Virtual Interview Fair!
Newark, New Jersey
Newark Public Schools
Join us for our NBOE 2021 Winter Teacher Virtual Interview Fair!
Newark, New Jersey
Newark Public Schools
Superintendent, Dublin Unified School District
Dublin, California (US)
Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates
Superintendent, Dublin Unified School District
Dublin, California (US)
Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read