Special Report
IT Infrastructure & Management

What Will Trump’s FCC Mean for America’s Schools?

By Benjamin Herold — June 12, 2017 6 min read
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai speaks during the National Association of Broadcasters trade show in Las Vegas in April. School district leaders are worried that Pai is going to make changes to the federal E-rate program.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A change in leadership at the Federal Communications Commission has led to rising uncertainty about the future of efforts to boost broadband access, preserve an open internet, and protect online privacy—all issues affecting the K-12 sector.

Atop education leaders’ list of concerns is the E-rate, a $3.9 billion federal program that helps schools and libraries pay for telecommunications services. A wide cross-section of experts credits the FCC’s 2014 overhaul of the program for helping spur dramatic gains in the percentages of school districts with affordable high-speed internet connections and robust Wi-Fi networks.

“The E-rate is a model,” Evan Marwell, the CEO of broadband-advocacy group EducationSuperHighway, said in January. “Show me another government program where we’ve seen such spectacular results.”

But new FCC Chairman Ajit Pai doesn’t seem to share that enthusiasm.

As a commissioner, Pai voted against the 2014 E-rate modernization effort. One of his first acts after being appointed FCC chairman in January by President Donald Trump was to quash an internal report detailing the program’s success.

Although most observers say the E-rate does not face any existential threats, Pai’s past opinions and speeches, combined with a handful of early actions the commission has taken under his leadership, suggest that a number of its key elements could be up for reconsideration. Among them: the program’s annual spending cap, its formula for distributing funds, its rules meant to encourage the construction of new fiber networks, and its cumbersome application process.

The chairman declined multiple requests to clarify his position and plans.

One reason Pai was not available for an interview, according to an FCC spokesman, is the ongoing furor over his recent move to roll back so-called “net neutrality” rules. It’s among a handful of other issues at play before the commission that could also have a big downstream effect on the country’s public schools.

The resulting uncertainty is producing considerable anxiety in the K-12 sector, especially in states such as Nevada, where upgrading connections to rural and remote schools remains a challenge.

“There have been improvements, but we still have a long way to go,” said Brian Mitchell, the director of the governor’s office of science, innovation, and technology there. “I would hope that before any changes are made, let’s have a conversation and genuine consultation with states.”

One adjustment to the E-rate that would likely be roundly applauded: streamlining the program’s burdensome paperwork requirements.

It’s an issue that has been on Pai’s radar screen for years.

In April, he sent a scathing letter to Chris Henderson, the CEO of the Universal Service Administrative Company, describing “serious flaws” in the group’s management of the E-rate application-review process and demanding improvements. Henderson resigned two weeks later.

Other changes, though, could prove more controversial.

Marwell of EducationSuperHighway, for example, expressed concern at the possibility that Pai could seek to alter the E-rate’s rules on “special construction” projects.

As part of its 2014 E-rate modernization order, the commission moved to allow mostly rural schools and libraries to use E-rate funds to help pay for new fiber-optic networks to be built; to lease fiber networks themselves, rather than just paying for the information that flows across them; and to use federal funds to build their own fiber networks under certain conditions.

Opponents contend the special-construction rules would lead to duplicative fiber-optic networks and threaten some markets for private providers.

Former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, speaking at INTX: The Internet & Television Expo in 2015, has been critical of the new direction of the commission under the leadership of Ajit Pai.

USAC seemed to give official voice to such concerns this spring, sending out lengthy inquiries to roughly 100 school districts pursuing special-construction projects. In some cases, USAC had already approved the districts’ plans, and the new delays threatened the viability of efforts to bring high-speed internet to some of the country’s hardest-to-reach students.

“It’s basically indicating that the FCC might be changing the rules in the middle of the game,” Marwell said last month. “This is the most immediate thing we are concerned about.”

Others, including Tom Wheeler, a Democrat who preceded Pai as FCC chairman, are worried about potential changes to the way E-rate money is distributed.

Currently, the FCC helps fund internet and telephone services according to E-rate applicants’ need, capping the overall amount of money it pays for these requests by prioritizing certain types of service and applicants with the highest poverty levels. The amount of E-rate funds allocated for internal Wi-Fi connections and hardware, meanwhile, is based on the number of students enrolled in each school.

In a 2013 speech at the American Enterprise Institute, then-Commissioner Pai laid out his vision for a “student-centered” E-rate program. Essentially, he suggested that all E-rate funds should be distributed based on the number of students enrolled and that districts should be granted more autonomy over how to spend their E-rate dollars.

Under Pai’s previous proposal, additional funds would have been allocated for rural and low-income schools, but critics say it wouldn’t have been enough.

“If it goes to a per-pupil [payment system], I think that’s a real problem,” Wheeler said in April. “That is particularly hard on rural schools, where the greatest challenges are.”

That’s the fear of Mitchell, the Nevada state official.

After a big leap in 2016, roughly three-fourths of the state’s school districts now meet minimum federal connectivity targets. The cost of bandwidth has also been falling.

But many of Nevada’s remotest schools are caught in a bind, Mitchell said: Their current internet connections come via microwave towers or old copper T-1 lines, but the schools are surrounded by miles of rough terrain, and they serve very few students, making any potential upgrades incredibly expensive.

“We’d have to look at what the [per-pupil] cap would be, but it could make connections even more difficult,” he said.

Other issues, such as net neutrality and online privacy, aren’t likely to have quite so direct or immediate an impact on schools.

Pai announced last month his intent to roll back key regulations enacted in 2015 with the goal of preventing internet-service providers from prioritizing favored online content while blocking or throttling other content.

Critics from the K-12 sector worry that providers of online educational content might be relegated to internet “slow lanes” and that schools’ ability to stream online content requiring lots of bandwidth, such as educational videos, could be hindered by the FCC’s proposed approach.

Critics also raised alarms in April, when Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress enacted legislation undoing rules approved by the Wheeler-led FCC that put restrictions on how telecommunications companies can use the data they collect on their customers. The concern is that companies could now be free to sell students’ internet-browsing histories and other sensitive information.

Eyeing the big picture, John Harrington, the CEO of Funds for Learning, an Edmond, Okla.-based E-rate-consulting company, said it is clear that change is in the works at the FCC, and there could be a real impact for schools. The reliance on a slowly dwindling population of telephone users to fund universal-service programs is a long-term structural issue that bears watching, he added.

But in the here and now, Harrington said, any debate over the future of the E-rate is almost certain to involve how the program is administered, not whether it should continue to exist.

There’s a basic reality that should give anxious K-12 leaders some measure of comfort, he said during a presentation in April at the annual conference of the Consortium for School Networking.

“This isn’t a red-state or blue-state issue,” Harrington said. “Every congressperson in the country has school districts that are counting on these funds.”

Coverage of learning through integrated designs for school innovation is supported in part by a grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York at www.carnegie.org. Education Week retains sole editorial control over the content of this coverage.
A version of this article appeared in the June 14, 2017 edition of Education Week as What’s in Store For Trump’s FCC?

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
(Re)Focus on Dyslexia: Moving Beyond Diagnosis & Toward Transformation
Move beyond dyslexia diagnoses & focus on effective literacy instruction for ALL students. Join us to learn research-based strategies that benefit learners in PreK-8.
Content provided by EPS Learning
Classroom Technology Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Is AI Out to Take Your Job or Help You Do It Better?
With all of the uncertainty K-12 educators have around what AI means might mean for the future, how can the field best prepare young people for an AI-powered future?
Special Education K-12 Essentials Forum Understanding Learning Differences
Join this free virtual event for insights that will help educators better understand and support students with learning differences.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

IT Infrastructure & Management Sizing Up the Risks of Schools' Reliance on the 'Internet of Things'
Technology is now critical to both the learning and business operations of schools.
1 min read
Vector image of an open laptop with octopus tentacles reaching out of the monitor around a triangle icon with an exclamation point in the middle of it.
DigitalVision Vectors
IT Infrastructure & Management How Schools Can Survive a Global Tech Meltdown
The CrowdStrike incident this summer is a cautionary tale for schools.
8 min read
Image of students taking a test.
smolaw11/iStock/Getty
IT Infrastructure & Management What Districts Can Do With All Those Old Chromebooks
The Chromebooks and tablets districts bought en masse early in the pandemic are approaching the end of their useful lives.
3 min read
Art and technology teacher Jenny O'Sullivan, right, shows students a video they made, April 15, 2024, at A.D. Henderson School in Boca Raton, Fla. While many teachers nationally complain their districts dictate textbooks and course work, the South Florida school's administrators allow their staff high levels of classroom creativity...and it works.
Art and technology teacher Jenny O'Sullivan, right, shows students a video they made on April 15, 2024, at A.D. Henderson School in Boca Raton, Fla. After districts equipped every student with a device early in the pandemic, they now face the challenge of recycling or disposing of the technology responsibly.
Wilfredo Lee/AP
IT Infrastructure & Management Los Angeles Unified's AI Meltdown: 5 Ways Districts Can Avoid the Same Mistakes
The district didn't clearly define the problem it was trying to fix with AI, experts say. Instead, it bought into the hype.
10 min read
Image of the complexities of Artificial Intelligence.
Kotryna Zukauskaite for Education Week