Artificial Intelligence

More Teens Than You Think Have Been ‘Deepfake’ Targets

By Olina Banerji — March 03, 2025 4 min read
A photograph of a 13-year-old girl using her smartphone in a dark room. The content she is browsing from a social media feed projects over her face and on the wall behind her and shows a partial view of a pillow and mattress.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A growing number of teenagers know someone who has been the target of “deepfake” pornographic images or videos generated by artificial intelligence, a new survey shows.

One in 8 young people aged 13 to 20—and 1 in 10 teenagers aged 13 to 17—said they “personally know someone” who has been the target of deepfake nude imagery, and 1 in 17 have been targets themselves. Thirteen percent of teenagers said they knew someone who had used AI to create or redistribute deepfake pornography of minors.

These statistics come from a survey of 1,200 young people, conducted Sept. 7 to Oct. 7 and released by Thorn, a nonprofit group that advocates for child safety online. The report highlights the relative ease with which young people can create deepfakes: 71 percent of respondents who created deepfake imagery of others said they found the technology to do so on social media; 53 percent report they found tools through an online search engine.

See Also

Custom illustration by Stuart Briers showing two identical male figures sitting in a chair with a computer dot matrix pointing to different parts of the body. The background depicts soundwaves, a play button, speaker icon, eye, and ear.
Stuart Briers for Education Week

Schools nationwide have battled the rising challenge of deepfake nudes over the last few years. Boys as young as 14 had used artificial intelligence to create fake, yet lifelike, pornographic images of their female classmates and shared them on social media sites like Snapchat.

These cases have spawned new questions for schools about how to discipline students who create these types of images and prompted them to review policies on the proper use of technology and sexual misconduct. The concern over online safety has also sparked legislative action by a bipartisan group of lawmakers. To date, 136 bills to address nonconsensual intimate deepfakes have been introduced in 39 states, according to Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy firm.

The number of young people who are personally familiar with deepfakes is “really shocking,” said Melissa Stroebel, the head of research at Thorn and a co-author of the study.

The number of young people—1 in 17—who have been targets of deepfakes represent “a small percentage, but when we put that in context, that’s [at least] one in every classroom,” Stroebel said, adding: “That’s a startling rate of exposure to this particular harm at this point.”

More than 80 percent of the young people surveyed said they recognize that deepfake nude imagery “causes harm” to the person depicted. The top reasons they identified as causing harm were the “emotional and psychological impact” of the image and “reputational damage.”

This finding, Stroebel said, indicates that even if the adults are still debating the “reality” of these synthetic images and the harm caused by them, most young people feel strongly that creating or viewing this kind of imagery is abusive.

“That’s a good sign,” she said. “When young people recognize this type of imagery as harmful and abusive, they may be more likely to report it, provided [that] awareness also reinforces the fact that this threat is serious, rather than just a normal part of being online.”

Teens recognize the harm. But to what extent?

The report highlights a disconnect between the common knowledge of deepfakes among teenagers—1 in 3 teens and 1 in 2 young adults have heard of the term “deepfakes”—and the perception of harm caused by these images.

Too many young people don’t automatically consider deepfake images to be harmful, Stroebel said.

Teenage boys and young men are more likely than their female counterparts to think there’s no harm caused by deepfakes, or that the harm is “context dependent.” For instance, 7 percent of boys aged 13 and 14 thought the harm depended on the context compared to 2 percent of girls in the same age group. Among boys between ages 15 and 17, 10 percent thought the harm was context dependent, while 7 percent of their female peers thought so.

See also

AI Education concept in blue: A robot hand holding a pencil.
iStock/Getty

Overall, the 9 percent of young people who didn’t think deepfakes cause any harm thought so mainly because these images aren’t real and don’t cause physical harm.

It’s crucial for educators and other adults to teach young people the harms of deepfakes because that can affect how teens navigate the risks from deepfakes they’re increasingly encountering online, Stroebel said. It can also affect how often teens use AI tools—easily available online—to create and share deepfake images of others.

The Thorn report also captured responses from a small subset—2 percent—of young people who have created deepfake images, with a large majority of the creators—74 percent—targeting women. Over 30 percent of the creators indicated they had made nude imagery that depicted minors.

More than half of this group of creators reported that they shared these images with their friends or people at their school. Notably, 27 percent of the creators said the images they made were not shared and meant only for personal consumption. This could mean that people victimized by a deepfake don’t know they’re depicted and won’t have any recourse.

Schools and adults need to talk about risks with young people

To mitigate the risks, schools can start by clearly identifying deepfake nude imagery as a form of abuse and including it in their policies against bullying and harassment.

While most young people understand that deepfake nudes are a form of abuse, the survey found that 16 percent of respondents targeted by a deepfake don’t seek support to deal with the abuse because they fear being shamed, carry a sense of personal blame, or have concerns about not being believed.

Of those who did seek support, 60 percent said they either reported the image online or blocked the person who created it. More than half also sought guidance from a parent, teacher, or adult in their community. Most respondents who acted took both online and offline actions to deal with the abuse, the report noted.

Parents, guardians, or adults in the community around young people should be prepared to have “necessary conversations around relationship awareness, consent, and sexual education,” Stroebel said. “The digital world is just another place where that development is happening at this point.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
Hiring, Retention, and Fill Rates: A Data-Driven Sub Strategy
Explore what keeps substitutes coming back and hear how one district rebuilt its substitute hiring process and improved its fill rate.
Content provided by Frontline Education
Early Childhood K-12 Essentials Forum Early Childhood Education: Building Essential Skills for Success
Join this free virtual event to examine the biggest challenges in supporting young children, from preschool through elementary school. 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Absenteeism Webinar
Attendance Isn't an Attendance Problem
Boost attendance by strengthening relationships, belonging, and support with practical strategies from Doug Fisher & Nancy Frey.
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Artificial Intelligence LAUSD Adopts Moratorium on Student AI Use, Another Move to Limit Classroom Tech
The nation's second-largest district is pausing student use of generative artificial intelligence.
Howard Blume, Los Angeles Times
3 min read
A student uses Ed, a new district-developed Artificial Intelligence-assisted "learning acceleration web-based platform that will boost student success and revolutionize how K-12 education is tailored to meet individual needs," during the official launch event at Edward R. Roybal Learning Center in Los Angeles on March 20, 2024 .
A student uses Ed, the Los Angeles Unified School District's custom AI platform that later failed, during a launch event at Edward R. Roybal Learning Center in Los Angeles on March 20, 2024. LAUSD has now adopted a moratorium on student AI use. New York City schools have banned AI-powered tools for elementary and middle school students, meaning the nation's two largest districts have adopted major restrictions on student AI use.
Christina House/Los Angeles Times/TNS
Artificial Intelligence New York, Los Angeles Restrict Student AI Use. Will Other Districts Follow?
The restrictions come amid rising concerns about overreliance on technology in schools.
7 min read
Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani and Schools Chancellor Kamar H. Samuels today announced a moratorium on student-facing generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) use in schools, alongside a new screen time policy, a decision that will impact nearly 600,000 public school students, or two-thirds of the system's total enrollment at The Brooklyn Steam Center in New York City on Sept. 2, 2026.
Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani and Schools Chancellor Kamar H. Samuels announced a moratorium on student-facing generative artificial intelligence use in schools and a new screen-time policy during a press conference at The Brooklyn Steam Center in New York City on Sept. 2, 2026. The moratorium is part of a growing nationwide movement to ban or limit the use of AI and decrease screen time in schools.
Katie Godowski/MediaPunch /IPX via AP
Artificial Intelligence Spotlight Spotlight on Using AI with Purpose: Building Responsible Practices for Schools
Learn how to implement AI responsibly with practical guidance for school leaders, teachers, and district decisionmakers.
Artificial Intelligence Schools Caught Flat-Footed After Google Makes Gemini Chatbot Available to All Students
Schools wrestle with the question of whether to permit or prohibit access to the AI chatbot.
5 min read
Social Studies teacher Simon Sharick supervises students at the Plymouth High School in Ohio on how to properly prompt the Gemini Ai App to get their desired information. Students were using the Gemini App for the first time on Friday, Aug. 28, 2026.
Students in a social studies class on Aug. 28, 2026, at Plymouth High School in Plymouth, Ohio, learn how to properly prompt Google's Gemini chatbot to generate useful and accurate information. In August, Google made Gemini available to K-12 students of all ages. <br/>
Ruddy Roye for Education Week