Ed-Tech Policy

Funding for ‘E-Rate’ Discounts May Come Up Short, FCC Says

By Mary Ann Zehr — May 20, 1998 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Schools shouldn’t count on getting all the money they asked for this year from the federal “E-rate” program, a Federal Communications Commission official said last week.

“You have to expect that when demand exceeds the available money, not everybody gets everything they want,” said Ruth Milkman, the deputy chief for the FCC’s common carrier bureau, which regulates rates for local phone companies.

The FCC said this month that it expects to collect $1.67 billion from phone companies this year to pay for education-rate discounts on telecommunications services and equipment for schools and libraries.

That amount is $350 million less than the projected demand and $580 million less than the $2.25 billion yearly cap for the program set by the FCC.

Ms. Milkman said that the FCC still plans to collect an average of $2.25 billion each year for E-rate discounts, but that collecting that much for the first year is unrealistic.

“The FCC always said the $2.25 billion was an ongoing cap. Our target figure [for this year] was actually closer to $1.75 billion,” Ms. Milkman said.

The FCC lowered that figure to $1.67 billion based on how much money it projects that phone companies can provide for the program without having to increase long-distance rates, she said.

FCC Chairman William Kennard insisted that the agency “ramp up schools and libraries as fast and efficiently as possible but ... in a way that doesn’t cause rates to increase,’” Ms. Milkman said.

A Promise Is a Promise

Education groups, which are lobbying hard to protect the E-rate program, say the FCC should come up with the $2.25 billion they feel was promised.

“The $2.25 billion cap is the figure schools have been relying on,” said Leslie Harris, a lobbyist for the Consortium for School Networking and the Eugene, Ore.-based International Society for Technology in Education. “People have made their plans, signed contracts. I’m worried that if that [$1.67 billion] figure is adopted, a lot of schools will not receive their funding.”

An aide to Sen. Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine, a key congressional supporter of the E-rate program, said the senator would accept a figure less than $2.25 billion, as long as demand is met.

The $1.67 billion figure “is not a done deal,” said the aide, who asked not to be identified by name. “We need to see at the end exactly how much demand there is. Then if there’s still a gap, that would be of concern to us.”

The FCC is now seeking public comment on whether it should collect more than $1.67 billion, Ms. Milkman said. But when asked whether schools could expect the amount to grow, she said, “It’s unlikely.”

If demand for the discounts outstripped funding, poorer schools would receive top priority, FCC Chairman Kennard said recently in a statement.

The FCC announced the $1.67 billion figure in a May 8 report that deals mostly with how the agency plans to restructure the administration of the E-rate program.

The restructuring, effective next January, responds to a Feb. 10 General Accounting Office report that concluded that the FCC did not comply with the law when it created the Schools and Libraries Corp., which administers the E-rate program.

The FCC said it will consolidate the SLC and the Rural Health Care Corp.--which administers a universal-service program for rural health-care organizations--under one agency.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the May 20, 1998 edition of Education Week as Funding for ‘E-Rate’ Discounts May Come Up Short, FCC Says

Events

Jobs Regional K-12 Virtual Career Fair: DMV
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Making AI Work in Schools: From Experimentation to Purposeful Practice
AI use is expanding in schools. Learn how district leaders can move from experimentation to coordinated, systemwide impact.
Content provided by Frontline Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being & Movement Webinar
Building Resilient Students: Leadership Beyond the Classroom
How can schools build resilient, confident students? Join education leaders to explore new strategies for leadership and well-being.
Content provided by IMG Academy

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy Schools Have Another Year to Make Websites Accessible. Why That Matters
People with disabilities say inaccessible online content is a barrier to participating in public life.
4 min read
A gif with web accessible icons around a computer screen with a magnifying glass.
Shivendu Jauhari/Getty
Ed-Tech Policy Nation's 2nd Largest District Moves to Limit Student Screen Use
LAUSD will limit classroom screen time, emphasizing quality learning over device use.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Board of Education recently voted to limit screen time in classrooms.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
Ed-Tech Policy Letter to the Editor Don’t Ban Phones, Limit Them
Phones can be useful tools, says a high school student.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Ed-Tech Policy Welcome to the 'Funky' Politics of the Tech in Schools Debate
The Trump administration is cheerleading AI in schools as GOP lawmakers crack down on ed tech.
9 min read
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at the Marshall elementary school in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their studies. Today’s grandparents may have fond memories of the “good old days,” but history tells us that adults have worried about their kids’ fascination with new-fangled entertainment and technology since the days of dime novels, radio, the first comic books and rock n’ roll.
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at Marshall Elementary School in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their learning. The debate about how much time students should spend using technology to learn has been around for decades, but is now heating up in Congress and state legislatures and creating some unlikely allies.
Paul Vathis/AP