Ed-Tech Policy

Computer ‘Glitch’ Forces Recalculation of NAEP Scores

By Millicent Lawton — September 27, 1995 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Department of Education has gotten some unwelcome news about “the nation’s report card.”

Department officials found out last month that a computer program made mistakes in scoring results from both the 1992 and 1994 versions of the National Assessment of Educational Progress.

The mistakes, which affect the 1992 assessments in mathematics and reading and the 1994 reading and world-geography tests, had only a negligible impact on final scores, an official at the department’s National Center for Education Statistics said last week.

Nevertheless, officials are recalculating and reissuing scores that already have been made public.

Gary Phillips, the associate commissioner of the education-assessment division at the nces, said there is no need to change any interpretation of the data as a result of what he called a computer glitch.

When scores were recalculated correctly, average scores for a grade level typically went up or down by just one point. On the world-geography test, for example, the largest change by far was that some revised 12th-grade scores went up four points on a scale of 500 points.

Recalculating Scores

Naep, known as the nation’s report card, is the only national, ongoing measure of U.S. students’ academic achievement. It has been administered since 1969 in a variety of subjects to a sampling of students.

The error, discovered by chance in the process of preparing data for the statistics center, was made by a computer program used by the Educational Testing Service in Princeton, N.J., the company under contract to conduct the tests. Ets officials declined to comment last week, referring questions to Mr. Phillips.

The error occurred in the way the computer program scored test items that required a student to construct a response or write an essay. Some omitted answers were scored simply as missing instead of as wrong. Multiple-choice test items were not affected.

The discovery of the errors meant that the NAEP results in world geography had to be recalculated before they could be released.

They had been scheduled to be released this month, but as of last week they were expected to be released next month, along with the results of the 1994 NAEP test in U.S. history, said Larry Feinberg, an assistant director of the National Assessment Governing Board, which oversees naep. The computer-scoring glitch did not affect the history results and was not to blame for the delay, officials said.

Results from the 1994 reading test were released this year in the “1994 First Look Report,” which will be revised and re-released in a few weeks, officials said.

The more comprehensive reports on national- and state-level reading performance from the 1994 NAEP are being completed and will be delayed, officials said. The revised 1992 and 1994 reading results may be ready by Oct. 20, Mr. Phillips said.

The Math Factor

The full impact on the 1992 NAEP in math is not yet known, but there were relatively few open-response items on the test.

The statistics center plans to include the revised numbers for the 1992 math assessment in its 1996 NAEP reports, Mr. Phillips said.

The mistakes also have affected the National Education Goals Panel, which has been preparing its annual report on the nation’s progress in meeting or approaching the eight national education goals.

The report, which uses NAEP data extensively, will include footnotes on those pages with data on reading achievement, said Bill Noxonsic?, a spokesman for the goals panel.

The glitch has not delayed the planned Nov. 9 release of the report, he said.

Late last week, officials at the Education Department’s statistics center were looking into another possible mistake--not related to the ets glitch--that could affect NAEP results.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the September 27, 1995 edition of Education Week as Computer ‘Glitch’ Forces Recalculation of NAEP Scores

Events

Jobs Regional K-12 Virtual Career Fair: DMV
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Making AI Work in Schools: From Experimentation to Purposeful Practice
AI use is expanding in schools. Learn how district leaders can move from experimentation to coordinated, systemwide impact.
Content provided by Frontline Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being & Movement Webinar
Building Resilient Students: Leadership Beyond the Classroom
How can schools build resilient, confident students? Join education leaders to explore new strategies for leadership and well-being.
Content provided by IMG Academy

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy Schools Have Another Year to Make Websites Accessible. Why That Matters
People with disabilities say inaccessible online content is a barrier to participating in public life.
4 min read
A gif with web accessible icons around a computer screen with a magnifying glass.
Shivendu Jauhari/Getty
Ed-Tech Policy Nation's 2nd Largest District Moves to Limit Student Screen Use
LAUSD will limit classroom screen time, emphasizing quality learning over device use.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Board of Education recently voted to limit screen time in classrooms.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
Ed-Tech Policy Letter to the Editor Don’t Ban Phones, Limit Them
Phones can be useful tools, says a high school student.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Ed-Tech Policy Welcome to the 'Funky' Politics of the Tech in Schools Debate
The Trump administration is cheerleading AI in schools as GOP lawmakers crack down on ed tech.
9 min read
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at the Marshall elementary school in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their studies. Today’s grandparents may have fond memories of the “good old days,” but history tells us that adults have worried about their kids’ fascination with new-fangled entertainment and technology since the days of dime novels, radio, the first comic books and rock n’ roll.
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at Marshall Elementary School in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their learning. The debate about how much time students should spend using technology to learn has been around for decades, but is now heating up in Congress and state legislatures and creating some unlikely allies.
Paul Vathis/AP